Article Text
COMMENTS MADE IN WALL STREET. DOUBTFUL RUMORS INVOLVING ANOTHER PHILADELPHIA BANK. The news from Philadelphia of the failure of the Spring Garden National Bank caused the circulation in Wall Street of many disquieting rumors respecting the financial situation in that city. Trouble was reported in the affairs of one of the strongest banks in Philadelphia, but this was not credited by well-informed bankers here. The bank assailed by these rumors has a capital of $1,000,000 and a surplus, with undivided profits, according to its last statement, of more than $1,300,000. Its New-York correspondents are banks of the highest standing, and they emphatically expressed disbelief in the rumors. Another story which was circulated was that a large trust company in Philadelphia had failed or was embarassed, but it was generally considered that this grew out of the suspension of the Penn Safe Deposit and Trust Company, an organization which was connected with the management of the Spring Garden Bank. This deposit company was not believed to be large, and its collapse was regarded as a sequeI to the bank's failure. The general opinion among well-informed bankers is that Philadelphia has had a strained financial position since the culmination of the money panic in last November. Because of this, more credence was given to the disquieting rumors than might otherwise have been the case. A prominent bank officer said yesterday that the trust and safe-deposit companies of Philadelphia were not subjected to the same close scrutiny as is provided by the State laws of New-York and by the National Banking act. It has been known for some time that Philadelphia has been an excellent market for city railways, electric light companies, gas and water works, and even municipal building enterprises, which have been less ready of sale in the localities where the schemes originated. Many of these enterprises are admitted to be perfectly legitimate and full of promise of profit, but the secucities were not of a character on which realizations can readily be made when a monetary pinch is felt by the institutions which have made advances. It is supposed that the disaster to the Spring Garden Bank and the trust company allied to it may have grown out of some complication arising from this kinc of investment. The New-York correspondents of the Gpring Garden National Bank are the Hanover National Bank and the National Bank of the Republic. At both of these institutions nothing could be learned of the causes of the failure of the Philadelphia institution or of its probable extent. John Jay Knox, president of the National Bank of the Republic, said that in his bank there was a balance to the credit of the Spring Garden. At the Hanover information was withheld as to the balance between it and the Spring Garden, but it was stated emphatically that the Hanover would lose nothing by the failure. It is understood that the Spring Garden owes money to numerous New-York banks, but it is not believed that in any case the amounts are large or likely to cause embarrassment. The Spring. Garden, by a statement made in October, had $2,500,000 in deposits. In February the amount had fallen to a little more than $2,000,000, a comparatively small shrinkage considering the financial stress of the winter. The directors of the bank are Francis W. Kennedy, John B. Stetson, Ephraim Turland. Nelson F. Evans, Ephraim Young, Nathan Middleton and Robert C. Thomas. Mr. Stetson is head of a large hat-manufacturing concern. and Mr. Turland is a large retail drygoods dealer. Mr. Kennedy, who is the president of the bank. has been interested in numerous enterprises, and it is feared that these have led to an involving of the affairs of the bank. In other words, the bank is supposed to have had itself spread out" in too many concerns, in some of which the president and his friends have been interested. The bank was formerly a State institution, and was reorganized several years ago under a National charter.