Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
LA W INTELLIGENCE SUPERIOR COURT-SPECIAL TERM-Aug. 26.-Before Judge HOFFMAN. MR. JOHN THOMPSON UNDER ARREST. The Metropolitan Bank agt. John Thompson. Yesterday afternoon a replevin suit was commenced in the Superior Court, by the Metropolitan Bank, demanding the delivery of $12,500, or property to that amount. Mr. Thompson had yesterday morning, as usual, redeemed the county bank notes held by the Metropolitan Bank, by drawing his check for the amount ($12,500) upon another bank, which refused to certify it. A return of the bille having been refused, the writ of replevin was sued out. The Sheriff proceeded to execute the writ, and served the papers on Mr. Thompson, but could not obtain the money and made bis return accordingly. Thereupon an order of arrest, upon the claim of delivery of personal property, was granted by Judge Hoffman, at his residence, holding the defendant to bail in the sum of $15,000. This morning Mr. Thompson was arrested by Deputy Sheriff Stern, and is now in custody, not having obtained the required bail. The affidavits on which the order of arrest was granted set forth the above facts. Judge Duer granted a stay of proceedings in the above matter this afternoon, and an order to show cause why the order of arrest should not be set aside and vacated, returnable to-morrow morning at 10 o'clock. Mr. Thompson meantime remains in the charge of the Sheriff, but not in close custody. THE LAW OF LANDLORD AND TENANT. Erhard Richter against Benj. Van Raden. The defendant, as owner in fee, leased the premises Nos. 55 and 57 Forsyth street to the plaintiff's wife. The rent being unpaid, proceedings to dispossess have been taken before a Justice. The defendant admits that the lease was intended to be for the use and benefit of the plaintiff. There were long accounts between the parties, and claims, some admitted, some disputed. It is a question whether the defendant, after having made the plaintiff's wife his lessee, can go against him and get possession. Held, That the decisions of the Superior Court warrant an interference upon proper terms, and that & case within the rule is here made: but that the course of the Court in Forrested agt. Wilson, 1 Duer, 024, should be followed. The order, therefore, is that the injunction (prohibiting the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff) continue, upon the plaintiff paying into the Life and Trust Company the sum of $909 28, assumed to be the balance of the rent due on the 28th of July last, without prejudice to that question, and with a provision that as the rent becomes hereafter due, application may be made for its payment, or that the injunction be dissolved. SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL TERM-AUGUST 26.-Before Judge PEABODY. MORE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR. THOMPSON. Charles A. Holdship and Henry Holdship agt. John Thompson. The plaintiffs are creditors of Mr. John Thompson, the Wall street broker and banker. who suspended payment yesterday. Their deposite with him amounted to $7,000, for which they bring suit. Judge Peabody refused to grant an order of arrest against the defendant, upon the ground that this was acase in which the defendant had simply failed to make good his engagement as 8 depositary, and not one in which he had improperly used or withheld the funds of the deposifor while acting as his agent. He, however, subsequently allowed an order to show cause, on the 1st of September, why such order of arrest should not be granted. The following are the papers in the case: THE COMPLAINT. City and County of New-York, Charles A. Holdship and Henry Holdship. the plaintiffs in the above entitled action, by John H. Anthor. their attorDey, complain of John Thompson, defendant therein, and show to the Court as follows, namely: That at all the times hereinafter mentioned the said plaintiffs were, and they still are, partners in business, under the firm name and style of " Holdship & Co.," and the defendant was and is a broker or banker, doing business in the city and county aforesaid. That at divers times and on divers days, at the City of NewYork aforesaid, the said defendant received for the plaintiffs, as their broker and confidential agent in that behalf, divers sums of money, the property of the plaintiffs, amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $7,000 or thereabouts, to be by him, the said defendant, paid to the said plaintiffs, or their order, whenever 80 requested to do. The plaintiffs further show, that though repuested, the said defendant has not paid the said sums of money or any part thereof, but has converted the same to his own use and utterly refuses to pay the same. These plaintiffs further show, that by reason of the premises the defendant is justly indebted to them in the said sum of $7,000, together with their costs and exJ. H. ANTHON, plaintiff's attorney. penses. The usual jural is sworn to before Wm. H. Dusenbury Commissioner of Deeds, on the 20th of August, by Charles A. Holdship.