13021. Farmers & Merchants National Bank (Fairbury, NE)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
10340
Charter Number
10340
Start Date
March 1, 1925*
Location
Fairbury, Nebraska (40.137, -97.181)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
4b89862d

Response Measures

None

Receivership Details

Depositor recovery rate
66.3%
Date receivership started
1924-03-15
Date receivership terminated
1929-09-30
OCC cause of failure
Governance
Share of assets assessed as good
40.3%
Share of assets assessed as doubtful
22.7%
Share of assets assessed as worthless
37.0%

Description

Articles (1925-03-12 and 1925-07-23) describe the bank as defunct and discuss the receiver, liquidation, dividends and related litigation. No run is mentioned; the bank is in receivership and undergoing final wind-up, so this is a suspension that ended in closure/receivership.

Events (5)

1. March 5, 1913 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. March 15, 1924 Receivership
Source
historical_nic
3. March 1, 1925* Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Bank had failed and was placed in receivership/closed by authorities and is in liquidation.
Newspaper Excerpt
Howard S. Lahman, receiver for the defunct Farmers and Merchants Bank, said to a News reporter this week:
Source
newspapers
4. March 12, 1925 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Howard S. Lahman, receiver for the defunct Farmers and Merchants Bank, said to a News reporter this week: ...forecasts that depositors will receive at least 50 per cent... (discussion of dividends and liquidation).
Source
newspapers
5. July 23, 1925 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
The Farmers & Merchants National Bank filed its answer last week to the suit brought against some weeks ago in Federal Court by Herman E Fairchild ... the Receiver's answer denies that any of the notes were ever a part of the assets of the Farmers & Merchants National Bank.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Fairbury Daily News, March 12, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FAILED BANK AFFAIRS Receiver Believes It Will Pay At Least 50 Per Cent. Howard S. Lahman, receiver for the defunct Farmers and Merchants Bank, said to a News reporter this week: "The following comparisons are made from figures taken from the reports of your receiver and other receivers to the Comptroller of the Currency for the period from 1921 to the date this Trust was created and includes only figures from failed National Banks located in Nebraska and territory immediately contiguous. "Out of 33 failed National Banks, many of which have been in liquidation from one to three years longer than this trust, 21 had paid no dividend at all up to the time this bank paid its first dividend of 25 per cent. The most paid by any of these banks was 30 per cent. The average paid by the 33 banks was 8.66 per cent. With several of these 33 banks, was quite familiar and it is therefore reasonable for me to forecast that none will finally pay out better than the Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Fairbury, and few of them will pay as well. One of the four trusts which. had paid 30 per cent at the time this trust had paid its first dividend is already closed for good. Most of the 33 trusts have been in receivership year to three years longer than this one. At least two of the nine receiverships in Nebraska will not likely pay depositors over 15 per cent in the final wind-up. "For this trust, there is no reason, yet, to doubt that depositors will receive less than 50 per cent. Collections still continue to conform quite closely to the original estimates of asset values, with some assets classed doubtful or worthless being collected steadily. "Litigation, so far, has been very favorable to the bank, both as to decisions and amounts involved, and is believed judgments obtained will much more than justify the expenditures required to procure them. "With the view not only to increasing collectibility but to avoid harmful tactics in general, many debts have been extended until next harvest. Therefore, it is not likely another dividend will be paid until August, although one may be possible earlier. The pense of paying dividend discourages paying less than 15 per cent at time. "One obstacle to the payment of dividends is the fact that two claims aggregating $50,000.00 have been filed and although they were rejected, enough cash must be held back to pay these claimants their pro rata share should the courts compel me to recognize them. Thus if were to pay another dividend of 15 per cent in addition to the one of 25 per cent already distributed, before could do so would have to have sufficient cash not only to pay 15 per cent on all proved claims, but sufficient to leave 40 per cent of these two $50,claims in the receiver's hands. Thus $20,000.00 would have to withheld from creditors whose claims have been proved. However, as soon as the case shall have been adjudicated, if in your favor, the will, of course be prorated to you along with other funds collected."


Article from The Fairbury Daily News, July 23, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RECEIVER ANSWERS Suit Brought Against & M. Bank by Herman Fairchild. The Farmers & Merchants National Bank filed its answer last week to the suit brought against some weeks ago in Federal Court by Herman E Fairchild former vice-president and director of the Bank. on four individual notes aggregating Fairchild alleges that as a result of four judgments obtained against him and others by the Merchants National Bank of Omaha in the District Court of Jefferson County in March. 1925. he has right of action against the Farmers & Merchants National Bank The petition and answer show certain notes of Individuals were held by the Merchants National Bank of Omaha at the time of the local bank failure upon which Fairchild and the others were liable as guarantors Fairchild's contention is that the notes guaranteed for the Omaha Bank although signed by A. R. Nichols, E. R. Bee, Henry Duval and Fred Cox as individuals. represented obligations of the Farmers & Merchants National Bank and that the Bank should therefore be required to reimburse him for the judgments taken against him on these notes by the bank. The Receiver's answer denies that any of the notes were ever a part of the assets of the Farmers & Merchants National Bank, denies that the Bank ever had any connection with them or ever received any benefit from them: but alleges that Fairchild and the other guarantors knew that they were guaranteeing certain line of credit at the Omaha Bank to be used by them and other individual borrowers for the purpose of borrowing more money than the Farmers & Mercnants National Bank could legally loan them. that Fairchild was one of those for whose personal benefit the redit was arranged and that while he was not using it at the time the Omaha Bank brought suit he had made frequent use of It both for Fairchild Brothers and for the Fairchild Clay Products Company The defendant's answer further sets forth that even if the Farmers & Merchants National bank had any liability by reason of these individuals borrowing at outside banks the notes being sued upon were made by persons still have obligations to the local bank or who have settled their obligations for less than their face amount and that the right of Fairchild against this bank had any. should have been off set agaist the indebtedness of himand the others to the Farmers Merchants Naional bank all but of which were settled for less their face amount