National German American Bank

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: national
Bank ID: 2943
Charter Number: 2943
Start Date: November 10, 1905
Location: St Paul, Minnesota (44.944, -93.093)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 416c75de

Response Measures

None

Description

The only article references a receivership case (Thomas R. Shaw, receiver, v. National German American Bank of St. Paul) heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on 1905-11-10. No contemporaneous run or suspension description is provided in the excerpt, but the presence of a receiver indicates the bank had been closed and placed in receivership. Limited information in the excerpt prevents dating of the suspension; classification as suspension_closure is based on the receivership/closure outcome.

Events (1)

1. November 10, 1905 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: Thomas R. Shaw, receiver, &c., plaintiff in error, agt. National German American Bank of St. Paul, Minn.; submitted in pursuance to the twentieth rule by Mr, Guy C. H. Corliss for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. J. W. Lusk for the defendant in error.
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (1)

1. November 10, 1905 Evening Star Washington, DC

Article from Evening Star, November 10, 1905

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THE COURT RECORD Supreme Court of the United States. Friday, November 10, 1905. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice Brown. Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice Peckham. Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr. Justice Holmes and Mr. Justice Day. Jose R. F. Savage of San Juan, Porto Rico, was admitted to practice. No. 115. Thomas R. Shaw, receiver, &c., plaintiff in error, agt. National German American Bank of St. Paul, Minn.; submitted in pursuance to the twentieth rule by Mr, Guy C. H. Corliss for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. J. W. Lusk for the defendant in error. No. 75. The Guardian Trust and Deposit Company et al., petitioners, agt. B. J. Fisher et al.; passed temporarily on motion of Mr. A. H. Taylor for the petitioners. Nos. 81 and 82. The people of the state of New York ex rel. the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, agt. Nathan L. Miller, controller, &c.; passed, to be restored to the call under the provisions of section 9, rule 26, on motion of Mr. A. B. Browne, in behalf of counsel. No. 72. Allen C. Clark et al., appellants, agt. John E. Roller, intervenor; and No. 451. John E. Roller, intervenor, appellant, agt. Allen C. Clark et al.; argument continued by Mr. Leo Simmons for Clark et al. and by Mr. John E. Roller pro S2. Proceedings after The Star went to press yesterday: No. 58. Alabama Great Southern Railway Company agt. H. C. Thompson, administrator. etc.; leave granted counsel for Thompson to file additional brief within five days. No. 61. Mary McCune, etc., appellant, agt. N. Fred Essig et ux.; submitted by Mr. W. E. Cullen for the appellant, and by Mr. George Turner for the appellees. No. 64. Gustav E. Hafemann, plaintiff in error, agt. Fred A. Gross et al.; argued by Mr. Roger S. Powell for the plaintiff in error, and submitted by Mr. Thomas J. Davis for the defendant in error. No. 66. John C. Gore et al., appellants, agt. the United States et al.: submitted by Mr. Hämilton G. Howard for the appellants, and by Mr. H. G. Platt and Mr. Richard Bayne for the appellees, with leave to counsel for appellees to file an additional brief within fifteen days, and to counsel for appellants to reply thereto. Nos. 67 and 68. James Fappiano, plaintiff in error. agt. Robert A. Speed, clerk, etc. Argued by Mr. Charles T. Cates, jr., for defendant in error, and submitted by Mr. W. M. Randolph and Mr. Wassell Randolph for the plaintiff in error. No. 70. George O. Campbell et al., plaintiffs in error, agt. the state of California. Passed. No. 71. The people of the state of New York ex rel. Simon Lieberman, plaintiff in error, agt. John E. Van De Carr, warden, etc. Argued by Mr. Frank Moss for the plaintiff in error and submitted by Mr. Theodore Connoly for the defendant in error. Leave granted to counsel for plaintiff in error to file additional brief within five days. No. 72. Allen C. Clark et al., appellants, agt. John E. Roller, intervener; and No. 451. John E. Roller, intervener, appellant, agt. Allen C. Clark et al. Argu-