Article Text
ROW H NI LAMYERS ATTORNEY HALE'S LITTLE BILL JO SLOT CHEVRING SI FUN. A MEETING OF THE BENCH HEARS THAT SUITS WILL NOW BE BEGUN AGAINST STOCKHOLDERS IN LOUIS F. MENAGE'S CONCERN. The Receiver's Bulky Report Objected To by Some Creditors. The trouble which has been brewing between Attorney W. E. Hale and the receiver of the Northwestern Guaranty Loan company, the Minneapolis Trust company, was aired yesterday all day in the district court. It was considered of SO much importance that all of the members of the bench in the city, Judges Russell, Pond and Belden, sat to hear the arguments. In addition nearly half of the prominent members of the bar in the city were present either as counsel for the creditors of the defunct concern or as witnesses. The first speaker following the opening of the court was Col. Ripley, who maintained that no money should be paid over to the receiver trust company at this time. There was but a small amount on hand, and that should be kept for any exigency which might arise. Col. W. E. Dodge called the colonel to order, and suggested that his report was the first thing on the programme. He asked first that the court pass upon the receivership claims in order that the trust company might know exactly what it was to receive for its services. He added that there would be $20,000 more on hand than was included in the report. MR. HALE'S STATEMENT. At this juncture in the proceedings Attorney Hale interposed: "Before proceeding further I wish to make a statement in justice to my position as an officer of the court. "The receiver is an officer of this court. I began to be counsel at the appointment, and I have had charge of all the matters connected with this receivership. I have given my entire time for the past two years to that work, and I have heard no complaint but what I have done my duty. Regarding my removal, reports soon get abroad that it was because of unprofessional conduct on my part. I have practiced law in this state for years, and was never charged with such a thing until the executive committee of this trust company made it." Mr. Hale, continuing, went into details regarding his fees, and his correspondence with Charles N. Hamblin. "I got this letter from the board," he said, "stating that my conduct in not presenting to them my bill for allowance was in a degree unprofessional. I considered it, in black and white, a libel and a slander. I waited until I cooled off, and I wrote a letter to them." Mr. Hale said that he replied with a rather pacific letter in which he denied the charge, saying that it was false and malicious. He thought the whole action very peculiar in view of the fact that the Minneapolis Trust company had been made receiver upon the express condition