Article Text
DENIED MOTION FOR NON SUIT Suit For $15,000 Damages on Trial Before Jury in Superior Court-Other Matters Disposed of and Several Decisions. Non Suit Motion Denied. Much was accomplished in the superior court at New London on TuesEdward Spicer of Groton was defendant in a damage suit for $15,000 day when a number of matters was by Judge Reed and jury. The plaindisposed of. tiff is Nathan Church of Montville. The claims in the cases of Adeline Church claims that on Dec. 22, 1903, he was run over on Thames street, H. Williams vs. Frank M. Rose, execuGroton, by one of Mr. Spicer's business tor, appeal from probate, and William wagons. He suffered a broken leg and B. Williams and others vs. Frank M. other injuries. Rose. executor, appeal from probate, The trial of the case was started in are disallowed and the decision of the the morning after the two suits of ev. London probate court in the origWilliams vs. Rose, executor, appeal ina! disposition of the estate in quesfrom probate, had been settled. tion stands. These cases were schedIn the afternoon Attorney Hadlai A. tiled for hearing Tuesday before Judge Hull for Spicer moved for non suit. Reed and jury in the superior court, The motion was denied and trial of but were settled without trial. the case resumed. Attorney Hull Brandegee, Kenealy, Brennan & claimed that first the driver of the Whittlesey for the plaintiffs, and wagon, owned by Spicer, which ran Brown & Perkins for Rose, and Atover Church, should be sued, and then torney John C. Geary for other inif it were established that he could not terests, agreed to the withdrawal of pay that Spicer could be sued. the cases, to entering of judgement disDecisions by Judge Reed. allowing the claims and to settlement with no expense except the actual The following decisions have been costs. handed down by Judge Reed: Bank Receiver. He dismisses the divorce suit of William A. Gilbert vs. Julia E. Gilbert. D. Burrows Spalding was on Tuesday This suit was heard at a short calenappointed temporary receiver of the dar session a few weeks ago. Gilbert Stonington Savings bank. The apasked a decree on the ground of depointment was made by Judge Reed sertion. in the superior court upon the appliIn Sarah Kingsley and others vs. the cation of Attorney William J. BrenWindham Manufacturing company, the ian, acting for the directors of the motion to cite in co-defendant is delank, who asked for a receiver to wind ried. up the affairs of the bank and to proIn Elizabeth R. Norton vs. Leonard tect its property. ?'he directors are Moses Pendleton. E. Harris, motion for more specific statement is granted in part and deOscar Pendleton, Horace Pendleton, nied in part. George H. Robinson, George E. GrinI ell, James H. Stivers and D. Burrows In Joseph Romanowsky vs. town of Spalding. Colchester, motion to expunge and correct is granted in part, mรฉmorandum This matter has been dragging on since 1905, when Judge Ralph Wheeler flec ,and motion for bonds and costs heard a petition for a continuation of granted, bond of $75 being ordered filed on or before the dav of trial. the order restraining the bank from In Charlotte H. Trail vs. Mark D. raying money to depositors. It was announced some time ago that the Stiles, the demurrer is overruled. The same ruling is made in William baLk had paid depositors all but a H. Trail vs. Mark D. Stiles. small per cent. of their deposits.