8848. Wiscasset Savings Bank (Wiscasset, ME)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Reopening
Bank Type
savings bank
Start Date
January 1, 1879*
Location
Wiscasset, Maine (44.003, -69.666)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
770680d7

Response Measures

None

Description

Newspaper articles describe the Wiscasset Savings Bank being enjoined (court injunction) in 1879 which restrained payments (a suspension by court order). The injunction was dismissed in April 1882 and the bank resumed normal business. No run is described; this is a suspension by government/court action followed by reopening.

Events (3)

1. January 1, 1879* Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Court injunction in 1879 restrained the bank from paying deposits (court-ordered restraint of payments).
Newspaper Excerpt
In the case of the Wiscasset Bank, enjoined in 1879, the injunction was dismissed last April
Source
newspapers
2. April 1, 1882* Reopening
Newspaper Excerpt
the injunction was dismissed last April, and the Bank, he says, now merits and receives the complete confidence of its depositors.
Source
newspapers
3. * Other
Newspaper Excerpt
The affairs of two banks are yet in the hands of receivers, the Newport Bank and the Solon Bank. ... The reserved fund is $958,893, an increase during the last twelve months of $87,877
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

Article from The Portland Daily Press, December 12, 1882

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Maine Savings Banks. The report of Mr. Fred E. Richards, State Bank Examiner, is at hand, and shows that the Savings Banks of Maine are in prosperous condition. The amount of deposits, we are told, has increased, the new investments have been wisely made, and very many of the securities owned, upon which the payment of dividends or interest was suspended some years ago, have during the past twelve months become dividend-paying stocks. The only possitle loss of consequence sustained during the year is to those banks so unfortunate as to be depositors in the Pacific National Bank of Boston, and it is doubtful if any loss be éventually incurred in thistransaction. The securities held by the thirteen Savings Banks whose deposit accounts were reduced by decree of Court during the years 1877 and 1878 have, the Examiner says, so much appreciated in value that nearly all of these banks have made partial or final special dividends within the last two years to the depositors whose accounts were so reduced. He reports that, with the exception of interest, it seems probable that in the end very little loss will be sustained by those interest ed in these banks at the time of the reduction. In the case of the Wiscasset Bank, enjoined in 1879, the injunction was dismissed last April, and the Bank, he says, now merits and receives the complete confidence of its depositors. The affairs of two banks are yet in the hands of receivers, the Newport Bank and the Solon Bank. It is estimated that the first named will pay 75 per cent. to depositors, and the last named 100 per cent. In the first case several suits are pending and an early settlement of affairs is not probable. In the case of the Solon Bank there is no litigation attending settlement, and the final dividend will soon be declared. The increase of deposits is marked. In 1878 the deposits decreased $3,725,320, and in 1879 further decreased $186,363. In 1880 the deposits increased $1,968,183; in 1881 the increase was $2,900,180; from Nov. 1881 Nov. 1, 1882 the increase has been $3 029.334. The amount now on deposit is $29,503,889. The number of depositors during the year has increased 7,512, the present number being 95,487, of which 76,602 are depositors of sums not exceeding $500 each. The average amount to the credit of each depositor is $308.87. The reserved fund is $958,893, an increase during the last twelve months of $87,877 The dividends declared range from 31 to 6 per cent., thirty-five of the fifty-five banks paying four per cent. The Examiner recommends the modification of the strict law of 1877 rigidly limiting the investment of deposits, arguing that' the statute was enacted while the country was suffering from the financial panic of 1873, and that its provisions are now unnecessarily rigid. In this recommendation we are not prepared to join. The restrictive statute may to some extent interfere with sound investments, but it has proved a strong shield to those investors who can afford to take no risks, and who prefer small and certain returns to promising hazards. If error be made it is better to make it on the side of caution. The Examiner also suggests a reduction of the State tax. At the time the one per cent. tax was imposed investments yielded seven and eight per cent. But the interest is now no more than four per cent. So the tax now is much more onerous. One fourth of the gross earnings of depositors is appropriated to the State. The complaint seems well taken, and the Examiner makes a pertinent suggestion when he urges that a reasonable reduction in the rate of taxation will increase rather than diminish the aggregate amount of revenue, while a policy less liberal will have a tendency to transfer these deposits to the Savings institutions of other States, or to distribute them,among the 96,000 depositors, completely beyond the reach of taxation.


Article from Oxford Democrat, January 30, 1883

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

MAINE SAVINGS BANKS. The report of Mr. Fred E. Richards, State Bank Examiner, is at hand, and shows that the Savings Banks of Maine are in prosperous condition. The amount of deposits, we are told, has increased, the new investments have been wisely made, and very many of the securities owned, upon which the payment of dividends or interest was suspended some years ago, have during the past twelve months become dividend-paying stocks. The only possible loss of consequence sustained during the year is to those banks so unfortunate as to be depositors in the Pacific National Bank of Boston, and it is doubtful if any loss be eventually incurred in this transaction. The securities held by the thirteen Savings Banks whose deposits accounts were reduced by decree of Court during the years 1877 and 1878 have, the Examiner says, so much appreciated in value that nearly all of these banks have made partial or final special dividends within the last two years to the depositors whose accounts were so reduced. He reports that, with the exception of interest, it seems probable that in the end very little loss will be sustained by those interested in these banks at the time of the reduction. In the case of the Wiscasset Bank, enjoined in 1879, the injunction was dismissed last April, and the Bank, he says, now merits and receives the complete countdence of its depositors. The affairs of two banks are yet in the hands of receivers, the Newport Bank and the Solon Bank. It is estimated that the first named will pay 75 per cent. to depositors, and the last named 100 per cent. In the first case several suits are pending and an early settlement of affairs is not probable. In the case of the Solon Bank there is no litigation attending settlement and the final dividend will soon be declared. The increase of deposits is marked. In 1878 the deposits decreased $3,725,320, and in 1879 further decreased 8186,363. In 1880 the deposits increased $1,968,183; in 1881 the increase was $2,900,180; from November 7, 1881, to November 1, 1882, the increase has been 83,029,334. The amount now on deposit is $29,503,889. The numher of depositors during the year has increased 7,512, the present number being 95,487, of which 76,602 are depositors or sun's not exceeding 8500 each. The average a mount to the credit of each depositor is $30.8.87. The reserved fund is $958,893, an increas during the last twelve months of $87.377. The dividends declared range from 31-2 to 6 per cent., thirty-five of the fifty-five banks paying four per cent. The Examiner recommends the modifcation of the strict law of 1877 rigidly limiting the investment of deposits, arguing that the statute was enacted while the country was suffering from the financial panic of 1873, and that its provisions are now unnecessarily rigid. 1u this recommendation we are not prepared to join. The restrictive statute may to some extent interfere with sound investments, but it has proved a strong shield to those in. vestors who can afford to take no risks, and who prefer small and certain returns to promising hazards. If error be made, it is better to make it on the side of caution. The Examiner also suggests a reduction of the State tax. At the time the one per cent tax was imposed investments yielded seven and eight per cent. But the interest is now no more than four per cent. So the tax now is much more onerous. One-fourth of the gross earnings of depositors is ap. propriated to the State. The complaint seems well taken, and the Examiner makes a pertinent suggestion when he urges that a reasonable reduction in the rate of taxa. tion will increase rather than diminish the 3 aggregate amount of revenue, while a po- to cy less liberal will have a tendency h insfer these deposits to the savings instit tr. utions of other States, or to distribute them among the 96,000 depositors, completely beyond the reach of taxation.Whig.


Article from Daily Kennebec Journal, January 3, 1899

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

velopments. however. the longer. useless to carry of them the commissioners deficiency ap'The report by the court showed the a assets of pointed about 5 per cent in item of only Their report included under an prothe uncollected bank. interest which cannot carof law a savings bank therefore. visons of asset. This was not. as an consideration in court taken of the reduction. trustees ry the amount into determining The cent to authorize the per did, however, and pav a dividend of 134 the nature collect fund. This was in and made out of this to the depositors, cent. A of a return reduction only 81/4 per set aside, the actual reserve fund was also protect despecial in amount to fully old from further losses on positors sufficient probable inand make it quite returned vestments, further percentage will future. be that a same accounts in the this on the feel confident that with of the bank reduc- is tion 'I the present condition and that it is deserving and a of their beyond continuance of the question. confidence of patronage. the the deposits public before A statement shows $376,864.31; after reduction. reduction were The resources before were $339,177.88. $394,634.06; since $351,224.70. INSOLVENT SAVINGS BANKS. It is practically institution impossible can be so that managed bank any to provided for financial avoid all loss. The savings setting apart has fund which is: a reserve for the purpose of where sufficient law as wisely usually meeting found such the is losses. In so those large few that cases this reserve important losses are it becomes an as to not question sufficient, how to manage and affairs secure so for protect alle largest depositors return possible from 'them the the institution. the assets of at the present time pro- The Our statutes methods of procedure. vide two to appoint a receiver bank to take and pos- disfirst is of the assets of the dividing the propose session of them as he among may, the depositors. sacceeds method pro rata frequently results the in affairs a ritice This of assets, business as in settling corporations. method firms of insolvent It was the only enacted, or individuals. to 1877, when a conditions, law was authorprior which, under court certain to reduce the account amount pro of ized each the individual depositor's losses. thereby making rata to meet solvent the and giving business. it the necthe bank credit to continue substantially essary One of these methods has been pursued as outlined in the where statute the assets of a savings exin all cases become impaired. with Wiscasset one bank have the case of the restrained ception. Bank, In in 1879, the court and paying out Savings bank from receiving This afterwards was bank to pay depositors The a that deposits tion until further order. modified so injune- as cer- af- to permit the cent of their deposits. continued under tain per bank were when the fairs of from the the court until and 1882, the bank alinjunction orders was removed its business in the usulowed to continue During this time, the to earnings make it solvent al of way. the bank without were The any sufficient reduction ultimate result of deposi- was full tors accounts. depositor received interest. the Had that every his deposit with the hands amount of been placed in would' unthis institution the depositors portion of race.ver, ave received only that a too after doubtedly amount due them, and the bank was waiting the fully as long deposits as under the enjoined from paying exist. On the other conditions that court dia had scaled the deposi- have hand. if ounts, .00 the reduct. and would probably tors' acc least 10 per cent. been never at would have been case returned. that different It is frequently the corporations, account and even of kinds banks, of business are compelled on stock. A stock dividends upon procedure losses to providing pass for a mode of allowsimilar ute to that had at continue Wiscasset. their busi40g savings a term banks without to paying dividends, losses, ness and using for their earnings depositors to meet in the would be either better for of the the methods that An ex- are now end than definicelv provided seen in by the law. case of the the ample of this Savings was Bank, where undoubtSouth Paris (with dividends solvent would without passing have made the bank amendment edly to depositors. An proceedings other loss statute providing for Wiscasset, to our to those taken at of small banks. would similar impairment be found in the useful assets in cases of savings