7903. Central Savings Bank (Detroit, MI)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
savings bank
Start Date
June 14, 1893
Location
Detroit, Michigan (42.331, -83.046)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
30aa0bda61470de3

Response Measures

None

Description

Article (June 1893) reports Detroit savings banks (including Central Savings Bank) adopting a notice/60-day rule to curb withdrawals amid contagion from numerous failures elsewhere (temporary suspension of immediate withdrawals). A later article (Nov 1895) refers to the Central Savings Bank being in receivership with depositors paid about 50 cents on the dollar, indicating eventual failure. Sequence: suspension (1893) then closure/receivership (by 1895) — no discrete depositor run on this specific bank is described in the texts provided.

Events (2)

1. June 14, 1893 Suspension
Cause
Macro News
Cause Details
Contagion from numerous savings institution failures elsewhere (financial stringency) led Detroit savings banks to require notice (60 days) for withdrawals to forestall runs.
Newspaper Excerpt
To stop the needless withdrawal of deposits and the locking up of currency in time of financial stringency, the undersigned banks respectively desire, in the event of unusual demands upon them, and to insure equal protection to all their depositors, to require the notice provided for in the by-laws of the several banks.
Source
newspapers
2. November 14, 1895 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
The supreme court of Michigan has recently rendered a decision ... receiver of the Central Savings bank of Detroit. ... The depositors of the bank have been paid, up to date, 50 cents on the dollar. (Nov. 14, 1895 article referencing the receiver).
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Mineral Point Tribune, June 17, 1893

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DETROIT, Mich. June 1:4-For some time there has been an uneasy feeling in the banking atmosphere of this city, occasioned by the nutgerous failures in saving institutions that have recently occurred throughout the country, especially in the West Although there has not been a decided run on any of the savings banks of Detroit, considerable money has been withdrawn in a quiet way, and to forestall any movement that might result disastrously to them, and as an act of mutual protection, the officers of these institutions met and adopted the following notice to depositors: There has recently been developed in our city an un asiness among savings depositors which has been (without cause) directed against some of our strongest banks. To stop the needless withdrawal of deposits and the locking up of currency in time of financial stringency, the undersigned banks respectively desire, in the event of unusual demands upon them, and to insure equal protection to all their depositors, to require the notice provided for in the by-laws of the several banks. We would, therefore, ask our depositors to review the situation calmly, and accept with patience our action, which is taken in our mutual interest and for the benefit of the community at large. People's Savings Bank, Michigan Savings Bank, Detroit Savings Bank, Citizens Savings Bank, Home Savings Bank, City Savings Bank, Wayne County Savings Bank, Central Savings Bank, Detroit River Savings Bank, Peninsular Savings Bank, Dime Savings Bank, German American Bank, American Banking and Savings Association, State Savings Bank. When the doors of the People's Savings bank, one of the largest in Detroit, opened at 10 o'clock an immense crowd of people flocked in with intention of withdrawing their deposits. They were handed cópies of the fore= going circular and told that their deposits would be paid in full at the end of specified time-sixty days. This seemed to allay the excitement somewhat. M. W. O'Brien, President of the People's Bank, had this to say of the situation: There is really no occasion for this excitement. The contagion is spreading eastward, and savings depositors, feeling anxious about their money, have been quietly withdrawing it for some time. To stop this needless withdrawal of deposits and locking up of currency in a time of financial stringency, we have taken this action to allay fear and protect ourselves. It was not for the want of money that wetook this action, for we could have secured enough. to have paid every depositor, but we did not think this the wisest "plan." At the People's Bank things began to quiet down when it was seen there was no occasion for alarm. A long line of business men making heavy deposits had much to do toward quelling the excitement, and everything is comparatively quiet at the other banks. Deposits in the People's Savings Bank amount to over $6,000,000. State Bank Commissioner Sherwood pronounces it and the other savings banks in the city in a first-class condition, and says there is no occasion for alarm.


Article from The Austin Weekly Statesman, November 14, 1895

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# REDISCOUNTED PAPER. The supreme court of Michigan has recently rendered a decision which involves a principle of banking law of general importance. It was in the case of the First National bank of Kalamazoo against George W. Stone, receiver of the Central Savings bank of Detroit. The court held that two notes of $5000 each, turned over with the endorsement of the Central Michigan bank to the Kalamazoo bank upon its request for some good securities, as it had a surplus of funds on hand, are nothing more or less than re-discounted paper upon which the receiver must pay dividends, the givers of the paper not being collectible. There is in the neighborhood of $150,000 of such paper outstanding, and as the receiver will be compelled to pay it pro rata with the depositors the latter will not be able to obtain any more dividends for a while, at least. The depositors of the bank have been paid, up to date, 50 cents on the dollar.