5161. State Savings Bank (Indianapolis, IN)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
savings bank
Start Date
October 15, 1879
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana (39.768, -86.158)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
e48e60b18e507b6e

Response Measures

None

Description

No article mentions a depositor run. Article (1879-10-22) identifies R. Frank Kennedy as receiver and a foreclosure action filed Oct 15, 1879, indicating receivership/liquidation. Article (1884-12-12) states the State Savings Bank (Indianapolis) paid its depositors 95 per cent and notes it had gone into liquidation. Thus the bank suspended operations and entered receivership/liquidation and did not resume normal operations.

Events (3)

1. October 15, 1879 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
R. Frank Kennedy, receiver of the State Savings Bank, Vs. Mary H. Brown et al. Be it known. that on the 15th day of October, 1879, the above named plaintiff... filed... his amended complaint ... R. Frank Kennedy, receiver of the State Savings Bank, Vs. Mary H. Brown et al.
Source
newspapers
2. October 15, 1879 Suspension
Cause
Voluntary Liquidation
Cause Details
Bank went into liquidation and a receiver was appointed; later paid depositors about 95% per article of 1884.
Newspaper Excerpt
R. Frank Kennedy, receiver of the State Savings Bank...
Source
newspapers
3. December 12, 1884 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
The State Savings Bank, of Indianapolis, paid its depositors 95 per cent. ... Six years ago I made an examination ... four of which have since gone into liquidation. The State Savings Bank, of Indianapolis, paid its depositors 95 per cent.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Indiana State Sentinel, October 22, 1879

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

JUDAH & CALDWELL, Attorneys. TATE OF INDIANA, Marion county, MR: In the Superior Court of Marion county, in the State of Indiana. No. 25,260. Room 8. Complaint, for foreclosure of a mortgage. R. Frank Kennedy, receiver of the State Savings Bank, Vs. Mary H. Brown et al. Be it known. that on the 15th day of October, 1879, the above named plaintiff. by his attorneys, filed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Marion county, in the State of Indiana, his amended complaint against the above named detendants, and the said plainLift having also filed in said clerk's office the amdavit of a competent person, showing that said defendants, Mary H. Brown, Brown, her husband, who'e Obristian name 1s Junknown to affiant, Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, of Philade'phia, Pennsylvania, Travelers' Insurance Company, of Hartford, Connecticut. are not residen's of the State of Indiana, and that though diligent search and inquiry has been made the refor, yet 18 the residence of the de endants, James Thomas. Martha Thomas and Joseph N. Pigg. wholly un: knowr, and that all of said defendants labove DR nedjare necessary parties to tois salt, which is an action to forerio e a mortgage upon real estate 10 Marion county, Indisea, in which real estate said defendants claim some;Interest. Now, therefore, by order of said court, said defendants last above named are hereby notified of the filing and pendency of said complaint against them. and that unless they appear and answer or demur thereto. at the calling of said cause on the 6th day of January, 1880, the same being the second judicial day of a term of said court, to be begun and held at the Court House in the city of Indianapolis, on the first Monday in January. 1850. said complaint. and the matters and things therein contained and alleged, will be heard and termined in their absence. DANIEL M. RANSDELL. Clerk. oct22-8w


Article from The Indianapolis Journal, December 12, 1884

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THE STATE SAVINGS BANKS. Examiner Bingham's Report Shows Them To Be in Good Condition. Their Business Growing and with Satisfactory Result-Suggestions to the Legislature for Amendments to the Law. The report of J. J. Bingham, examiner of the Indiana savings banks, has been filed with Auditor of State Rice. Besides giving a comprehensive statement of the condition of the savings banks, he makes several suggestions and recommendations to the General Assembly regarding changes in the laws govern ing the management of the savings institutions. Six years ago, the examiner says, I made an examination of the savings banks, when there were ten of these institutions doing business in Indiana, four of which have since gone into liquidation. The German Savings Bank, of Lafayette, paid all its obligations in full. The State Savings Bank, of Indianapolis, paid its depositors 95 per cent. The Richmond Savings Bank went into voluntary liquidation. The receiver of the Indianapolis Savings Bank has not yet wound up its business, but has paid the depositors thus far 60 per cent. There is yet remainingproperty unsold and appraised at $25.000, and if it sells for its valuation the depositors may receive 10 per cent. additional. It will thus be seen that the savings bank system in Indiana has not been altogether a success, as the number has decreased, with a loss to the depositors in two of those that went into liquidation. However, five now doing business have been successful in a marked degree, and one, while doing a limited business, has a good financial standing. The six banks now doing business are the People's Savings Bank, at Evansville; the St. Joseph County Savings Bank, at South Bend; the People's Savings Bank, at South Bend; the Terre Haute Savings Bank, the LaPorte Savings Bank and the Lafayette Savings Bank. The last named is the oldest and most prosperous in the State. The dividends paid by these banks are 21 and 3 per cent. semi annually. There has been a small increase in the deposits during the last year, notwithstanding the stagnation in business. The reports of the banks on Oct. 31, 1883, showed deposits amounting to $2,108,427.47. This year they reach $2,171,009.05, an increase of $62,581.58. The loans have also increased. A year ago they were $1,774,399 94, and this year they are $1,826,173.98, an increase of $51.774.54 "Our savings act," the examiner says, "tis an embodiment of the main features of the laws which govern such banks in the Eastern States. A careful review will show that the system is an anomaly in banking. The depositors, who are really the stockholders. have no word in their management. The trustees have no money invested in them. They give no assurance to the depositors but their good name for honesty, and their skill as financiers and business managers. They must each own unincumbered real estate worth at least $5,000, and they must have a certificate from the judge of the Circuit Court in the county in which the bank is located that they are in all respects suitable persons to be intrusted with the management of a savings bank. After this is done, the institutions. so far as the management is concerned, are self perpetuating. The law evidently contemplates them as charitable institutions, for the pay of the trustees is but a trifle. "There is one feature of the law which creates a guarantee for the security of the depositors, in requiring a certain per cent. of the profits to be set aside for a surplus fund, until it reaches at least 10 per cent. of the deposits. Only one of the banks thus far has carried out this provision of the law to the full extent. In other banks the losses have been charged to this fund, and the failure to credit it with a sufficient percentage of the profits has operated to keep it below a surplus of 10 per cent. of the de posits. In these cases it has been upon the theory that the earnings belong to the depositors and should be distributed among them. It would be better for the depositors to have appropriated a sufficient sum from the earnings to provide such a guarantee, rather than to have larger dividends, until this end is accomplished. While large dividends are very acceptable. security of the principal is a more important consideration." In examining the banksagreatdeal of liberty or license in carrying out the provisions of the law was found. but the examiner further says that his examinations, in many respects. have been gratifying and satisfactory. There is improvement in the methods of business. especially as to details. The system of book keeping exhibits the daily transactions accurately. and the accounts with the depositors have such corroborative proofs that they cannot fail to be satisfactory, as well as correct, which prevents controversy or dissatisfaction in settlements. Threeof the banks have women for book-keepers, and the work is done with an intelligence, neat ness and promptness that demonstrates their capacity in this department of labor, fully equal to the opposite sex. The examiner suggests to the Legislature. as additional security to the depositor. either an amendment to section 2730, Revised Statutes, 1881, to make imperative the accumulation of the surplus fund, to equal 10 per cent. of the deposits in a reasonable period, or by providing for a paid-up capital stock equal to at least 10 per cent of the deposits, to be regarded as a guarantee fund, and so invested in safe and valuable securities, with