4730. First National Bank (Amo, IN)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
8154
Charter Number
8154
Start Date
June 16, 1934
Location
Amo, Indiana (39.688, -86.614)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
3c02b2061e186a16

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles (duplicate) state the bank is defunct and a liquidating agent is in place; stockholders have sued to remove the liquidating agent and ask that a receiver be appointed. No contemporaneous run is described. This is a closure-related receivership matter reported 1934-06-16.

Events (4)

1. March 31, 1906 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. January 18, 1932 Voluntary Liquidation
Source
historical_nic
3. June 16, 1934 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Suit filed by Fred G. Shirley and Walter M. Hodson, stockholders ... alleged the agent has failed to protect the funds of the bank (removal of liquidating agent requested).
Source
newspapers
4. June 16, 1934 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Removal of W. Benton Newlin, liquidating agent of the defunct First National bank of Amo, is asked ... and asks that on his removal a receiver be appointed.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Indianapolis Times, June 16, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Agent Sued By Times Special DANVILLE, June 16.-Removal of W. Benton Newlin, liquidating agent of the defunct First National bank of Amo, is asked in a suit filed in Hendricks circuit court here by Fred G. Shirley and Walter M. Hodson, stockholders in the institution. It is alleged the agent has failed to protect the funds of the bank and asks that on his removal a receiver be appointed.


Article from The Indianapolis Times, June 16, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Agent Sued By Times Special DANVILLE, June 16.-Removal of W. Benton Newlin, liquidating agent of the defunct First National bank of Amo, is asked in a suit filed in Hendricks circuit court here by Fred G. Shirley and Walter M. Hodson, stockholders in the institution. It is alleged the agent has failed to protect the funds of the bank and asks that on his removal a receiver be appointed.