Polk County National Bank (Bartow, FL)

Episode Information

Episode UID
462701549
Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
46270 national
Charter Number
4627
Start Date
January 1, 1929*
Location
Bartow, Florida

Metadata

Model
gemini-3-flash-preview (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
a25fa5423c82b86d

Response Measures

None

Description

The bank was in a failing condition in early 1929 and was taken over by a successor bank of a similar name, which itself later entered receivership.

Events (5)

1. September 11, 1891 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. January 1, 1929* Suspension
Cause Details
Described as being in a failing condition; assets and liabilities transferred to a successor institution.
Newspaper Excerpt
Early in 1929 the older bank was in a failing condition and the new bank was formed to take over its assets and assume its liabilities.
Source
newspapers
3. April 16, 1929 Voluntary Liquidation
Source
historical_nic
4. November 8, 1929 Voluntary Liquidation
Source
historical_nic
5. January 1, 1931* Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
The decision was in a suit brought in 1931 by the receiver of the successor bank.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Owensboro Messenger, July 20, 1929

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Another Bank Closes Its Doors In Florida Reports of the closing the state Bank Pablo Jacksonville Beach reached the state banking today. Comptroller Ernest Amos said the bank liquid condition. but closprecaution when The bank Palbo the teenth bank which closed Florida this week and the Twenwithin weeks. Four others closed May and their president, John Fouts, Bartow, awaiting trial charge illegally lending himself funds. reassuring tion has from Washington dicating that lessening the fruit fly under consideration and that President Hoover plans recommend reimbursement for growers whose crops have been destroyed. This, together with growing public confidence, combined stop the runs Floridaa banks, the comptroller indicated.


Article from The Tampa Tribune, March 2, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

COURT REVERSES BARTOW BANK CASE JUDGMENT Holds With Old Bank in Liquidation Suit The United States circuit court of appeals at New Orleans yesterday reversed a decision by Federal Judge Akerman in which he awarded a judgment for $61,330 against the Polk County National bank of Bartow, and in favor of the Polk County National bank in Bartow, which took over assets of the older bank. The decision was in a suit brought in 1931 by the receiver of the successor bank. The receiver sought to establish liability of the older bank for endorsement of certain notes, which would enable him to assess its stockholders. Took Over Assets Early in 1929 the older bank was in a failing condition and the new bank was formed to take over its assets and assume its liabilities. The old bank gave its note for $1,576,520 pledged by all its assets. This note was to be liquidated from the essets and the stockholders were to be relieved of liability. Some of the notes sued on had been transferred to other institutions and in time were paid off by the new bank or its receiver in accordance with the agreement to pay debts of the old bank. Himes & Himes and C Edmund Worth, attorneys for the old bank, maintained this payment relieved the old bank. They maintained that the endorsement on other notes had been allowed to remain on them through oversight at the time they were delivered to the new bank. Judge Akerman held these pleas were not a valid defense and entered judgment. The receiver was represented by McKay, Withers & Ramsey. Court's Opinion The appellate which remanded the case for further hearing in reversing Judge Akermen's ruling, held in effect that the agreement between the two banks made the old bank a principal debtor and the new bank surety with respect to debts of the old bank, and that when the new bank paid off other banks, which held part of the notes, the old bank's liability was discharged. The court also held that the old bank could not be held liable on the notes on which its endorsement had been allowed to remain through oversight.