Boston National Bank - Seattle, WA

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: national
Bank ID: 4124
Charter Number: 4124
Start Date: April 24, 1894
Location: Seattle, Washington (47.606, -122.332)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 4dd4bb00

Response Measures

None

Description

Court docket entry (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 1894-04-24) references C. T. Conover, as receiver, vs. Boston National Bank indicating the bank was in receivership. The article does not describe any run or temporary suspension or reopening — only legal/receivership proceedings — so I classify this as a suspension leading to closure/receivership.

Events (1)

1. April 24, 1894 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: C. T. Conover, as receiver, vs. Boston National Bank - Continued until April 30, 1894.
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (1)

1. April 24, 1894 The Seattle Post-Intelligencer Seattle, WA

Article from The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, April 24, 1894

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

isms-Burgiary; pleaded not guilty; demurrer to information: overruled. EQUITY DEPARTMENT-LANGLET, 1. W. H. Dwyer VA. P. V. Dwyer-Order signed. directing receiver to pay preferred claims; In matter of assignment of Maltby Bros. -Order signed. directing partial distribution; C. M. Sheafe, as receiver. vs. Minda 8. Graff-Finding of facts, conclusions of law and decree; signed. E, D. Bacon vs. City of Seattie-Continust entil April 24, 1894. C. T. Cobover, as receiver, vs Stephen B. Hun-Continued until April 30, 1894. C. T. Conover, as receiver, va. Boston National 1894. Bank-Continued until April 30, A. W. Kenney vs. C. H. Whipple al.Order of default; signed. Thomas S. Krutz vs. C. H. Whipple et al., three cases-Order of defsult; signed. Elva D. Blackburn vs. Charles T. Blackburn--Findings of facts, conclusions of law and decree: signed. Angus Williamson vs. F. J. MonroeJudgment: signed. J. F. McNaught vs. Roy & Co., and Roy & Co. vs. Scott Harthey & Co., consolidated-This cause coming on regularly in pursuance to continuance, defendant files exhibit 11; order that exhibits 4. 5 and 11 be withdrawn and copies substituted therefor; advisement. after argument court took case under William Meydenbauer vs. James Leddy et al. and Theckia Meydenbauer et al. vs. James Leddy et al.-The two cases consolidated-Demurrer; argued and taken under advisement. George Randell, as receiver, vs. Puget Sound National bank-Continued until April 30, 1894. PROBATE DEPARTMENT-LANGLEY. J. Estate of James Parry-Order fixing May 4 for hearing amended petition for letters of administration; affidavit as to heirs; filed. Estate of Margaret E. Wilbur, deceased -Order of notice to creditors, proof of publication and decree showing due notice to creditors and exhibit; filed. Estate of Hattle Feas, deceased-Report of guardian ad litem; filed. CIVIL DEPARTMENT-OSBORN. 3. S.O. Morford vs. Fry & Brunn-Continued to April 25. Gust Anderson vs. John Wagner et al.Order reinstating case: signed. C. K. Jenner et al. vs. J. A. S. Robertson -Stipulation dismissing action; signed. Seattle Transfer Company vs. J. B. Powles-Verdict for defendant.