1960. Continental Trust Company (Washington, DC)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
trust company
Start Date
January 18, 1930
Location
Washington, District of Columbia (38.895, -77.036)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
2121756a

Response Measures

None

Description

The articles describe Continental Trust Company having sold its assets to Commercial National Bank on January 18, 1930 and ceasing to operate as a bank (permanent closure). No bank run is mentioned. Later pieces (1935, 1937) describe legal proceedings and assessments related to the sale and a 100% levy on Continental stockholders by the Comptroller/receiver. Classified as suspension_closure (suspension/closure without a run).

Events (3)

1. January 18, 1930 Suspension
Cause
Voluntary Liquidation
Cause Details
Sale of assets to Commercial National Bank; Continental ceased to operate as a bank after the sale.
Newspaper Excerpt
The suit arose out of the sale by the Continental Trust Company of its assets to the Commercial National Bank on January 18, 1930. Although Continental ceased to operate as a bank, it retained its corporate existence
Source
newspapers
2. May 29, 1935 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
O'Connor ordered the 100 per cent assessment against Continental stockholders May 29, several months after a similar assessment was levied on Commercial stock.
Source
newspapers
3. February 23, 1937 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
The right of the Comptroller of the Currency to levy assessments against stockholders of the Continental Trust Company was affirmed by the District Court of Appeals in an unusual opinion rendered today.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Evening Star, June 4, 1935

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

SUT SEEKS TO BAR BANK ASSESSMENT 100% Levy on Continental Owners for Shares in Commercial Hit. Suit to enjoin Controller of the Currency J. F. T. O'Connor from A per Trust on Continental ment collection against of stockholders 100 Co. cent the of organi- assess- the zation's 4,000 shares in the Commercial National Bank was filed in District Supreme Court yesterday. The plaintiffs at the same time sought an injunction against an assessment levied against Continental stockholders by Receiver John F. Moran on the basis of individual stock ownings in the trust company. The four Continental shareowners who,entered the suit protested favoritism allegedly shown by O'Connor to Commercial depositors to the detriment of the Continental Trust Co., which was bought out by the now closed Commercial in January, 1930. a Continental's purchase of the 4,000 shares of Commercial stock the plaintiffs declare illegal as done without authority as an investment by officers of the trust company. Invalidation Is Asked. Plaintiffs in yesterday's suit demand invalidation of this stock purchase. which has resulted in the trust company's being listed as a Commercial Bank stockholder and liable to that extent for the debts of the Commercial National O'Connor ordered the 100 per cent assessment against Continental stockholders May 29, several months after a similar assessment was levied on Commercial stock. The total amount which the controller seeks to collect from Commercial holders is $400,000. the assessment. In protesting the suit contends individual that when the Commercial Bank bought out the trust company, the latter had sufficient assets to pay all valid claims. This eliminated necessity for an assessment. plaintiffs state. states the of the trust company time the sale solvency The of suit further precluded that need at the for of a asks of a court during substitution appointment receiver receiver and trial of the case to replace Moran. Money Paid Out Attacked. Moran. according to the plaintiffs. has to suit recover moneys refused improperly bring paid to out to invalid a the trust company satisfy such against claims, petitioners claims. state, Chief originally is among debt listed on the bank's books as $2,600.000, but later scaled down by liquidation to $668.000. The "debt" corresponded to the Amount of deposits in the trust company at the time of the sale. The revised sum included $200,000 in interest charges. The bank's officials refused to correct this error after it was brought to their attention by the protest of the trust company's directors, the suit states. Plaintiffs in this connection allege the trust company officers "colluded and conspired' with officers of the bank to continue this wrongful constuction of the contract by which the assets were the and trust to company's assess interest charges purchased instead of guarding the interests of the trust company. Debt Illegitimate, Is Claim. The suit claims money borrowed by the trust company from four banks to the last the purchase 4.000 Commercial block shares of consti- 800 of tutes an illegitimate debt. since the lending banks knew the money was to be used in purchasing the stock, an allegedly illegal transaction. It was asserted this money was borrowed at the direction of Wade H. Cooper, then president of both institutions, now under indictment on a charge of misapplying funds of the Commercial Bank. Attorney Frank S. Nesbitt filed the suit on behalf of Leila S. Dunn. 2925 Glover driveway; Anne S. Callahan, 3301 University avenue: Agnes V. Scott. 2400 Sixteenth street, and G. T. Scott, 4912 Quebec street. O'Connor. Moran and Robert T Baldwin, Commercial Bank receiver, are named defendants.


Article from The Washington Times, February 23, 1937

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

COURT BACKS BANK LEVY The right of the Comptroller of the Currency to levy assessments against stockholders of the Continental Trust Company was affirmed by the District Court of Appeals in an unusual opinion rendered today. In a unique suit, which placed receivers of two closed District banks at loggerheads with each other, the high court also ruled that banks which loaned the Continental Trust Company money with which to purchase stock in another bank were entitled to payment. Further complicating the opinion, however, the court ruled that the trust company, as a corporation, could not be held liable for the stock it had acquired, since the acquisition of the stock was in violation of provisions of the District code. The suit arose out of the sale by the Continental Trust Company of its assets to the Commercial National Bank on January 18, 1930. Although Continental ceased to operate as a bank, it retained its corporate existence and continued to invest its corporate funds. After Commercial National Bank was placed in the hands of a receiver, it was found that the Continental Trust Company had acquired 4,000 shares of Commercial stock. Commercial's receiver had demanded payment of $400,000, represented in an assessment levy, because of the stock ownership. Stockholders of Continental then began their suit to enjoin collection of the assessment, cancellation of the receiver's demands and for an accounting between Continental and Commercial.