Article Text
THE STUYVESANT BANK. A VEXED SUIT ENDED AND THE QUESTION OF RECEIVERSHIP SETTLED-EVILS OF PROTRACTED CONTESTS IN THE COURTS. By a recent decision in the United States Circuit Court Mr. John H. Platt was confirmed as assignee in bankruptcy of the defunct Stuyvesant Bank. The case has been in litigation ever since the bank failed, over seven years, and during that time the creditors have not received one cent of the deposits committed to the bank. Mr. Platt now promises that a meeting of creditors will soon be held and the remaining assets will be distributed, they having been already converted into cash. This delay is very discouraging to the poorer creditors and they have become clamorous to know its cause. The following letter recently received illustrates their feeling:To THE EDITOR OF THE HERALD:Will you be kind enough to inform the members of the Co-operative Building Lot Association of Poor Men (upward of one hundred), who deposited their moneys in the Stuyvesant Bank (amounting to $3,000 and upward), why they have never heard of any divA SUFFERER? idends being made, and oblige Mr. John H. Platt. of No. 40 Wall street, the assignee of the Stuyvesant Bank, said yesterday that he did not know of any such association as that mentioned in the letter. He went on to inform the reporter that a final decree had been entered settling the question of the receivership of the bank in his favor, and that, as the funds had already been converted into cash, he would soon call a meeting of the creditors to distribute the assets. He could not state how much there was left or what the dividend would be. The Stuyvesant Bank, which formerly did business on the corner of Broadw and Astor place, suspended business on Thursday, October 12, 1871. It was a State bank and was not admitted to the Clearing House, the Merchants and Manufacturers' Bank doing all their Clearing House business for them. The bank redeemed the checks of the Stuyvesant until they became suspicious that it owed more money than it could pay, when they suddenly stopped this arrangement, and such stoppage was followed by the failure of the bank the next day. Mr. o H. P. Archer was appointed receiver by the Stipreme Court of this State, and at once began winding up the affairs of the bank, taking up their collaterals and converting them into cash. His appointment did not suit some of the depositors, and Mr. John Mack, one ot the creditors, entered a suit in the United States District Court for the appointment of Mr. John H. Platt as assignee in bankruptcy on December 28, 1871. As the bank had prior to this date been dissolved and a receiver appointed by the State Supreme Court before the return day of this proceeding no appearance was put in and the matter went by delauit. A perplexing question of law was thus raised between the State and United States courts. On March 20, 1872, Judge Blatchford decided that the bankruptcy proceedings superseded the appointment of State receiverships and confirmed Mr. Platt. At. appeal wa taken and the case has been dragging its slow length along the calendars of the United States Courts until a few weeks ago, when the decision was rendered allowing Mr. Piatt to proceed with the winding up of the bank's affairs. in 1972 there was all apparent balance of $160,220 27 in the bank and $16,455 94 cash on the hands of Mr. Archer. How much is left after the expenses of the long suit are paid and bad debts are deducted Mr. Platt could not say. The creditors will no doubt be agreeably surprised to get anything. Time may show how much it will be.