1.
July 15, 1906
The Salt Lake Herald
Salt Lake City, UT
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
RECEIVERS APPOINTED. Albany, N. Y., July 14.-Justice Fitts of the supreme court today appointed James B. Van Woert and Samuel Bryant of New York. temporary receivers of the Holland Trust company of New York. Recent examination of the company's affairs disclosed an apparent deficit of about $110,000.
2.
July 15, 1906
Evening Star
Washington, DC
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
York temporary receivers of the Holland Trust Company of New York and temporarily restrained the company from transacting business. This followed a complaint from the state banking department that a recent examination of the company's affairs had disclosed a deficit of about $110,000.
3.
July 15, 1906
The San Francisco Call
San Francisco, CA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Receivers for Holland Trust Company. ALBANY, N. Y., July 14.-Justice Fitts of the Supreme Court today appointed James B. Van Woert and Samuel Bryant of New York temporary receivers of the Holland Trust Company of New York. Recent examination of the company's affairs disclosed an apparent deficit of about $110,000.
4.
July 15, 1906
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake City, UT
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Holland Trust Company Short. ALBANY, N. Y., July 14.-Justice Fitts of the Supreme court today appointed James B. Van Woert and Samuel Bryant of New York temporary receivers of the Holland Trust company of New York. Recent examination of the company's affairs disclosed an apparent defloit of about $110,000.
5.
July 20, 1906
Watertown Weekly Leader
Watertown, WI
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
TRUST COMPANY CLOSED. Deficit Causes the Holland of New York to Be Placed in Hands of Temporary Receiver. ALBANY, N. Y., July 14.-Justice Fitts of the supreme court today anpointed James VanWoert and Samuel Bryant of New York temporary receivers of the Holland Trust company of New York and temporarily restrained the company from transacting business. This followed a complaint from the state banking department that a recent examination of the company's affairs had disclosed a deficit of about $110,000.