Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
⑉ One-fourth her (5,000 or 6,000) have left the city If we come to specie currency shall still want exchange, and that must be in paper and all history assures Us there is no exchange like the paper of responsible banks. It was very well known to every reading man that one of the greatest evils which oppressed the country before the adoption of the consti tution, was the various currencies which were afloat When the convention met. the currency was paper and continental. To Congress was given the power of coining money. Was it exclusively for the Govern ment No one believes it. No rational man puts any such construction on the power. He asked gentlemen to point to any provision on which the President founded his doubt, expressed in the message, whether we have any thing to do with paper money. Congress has power to regulate trade, a provision which embraces every thing. The inferred power of Congress, under the provision regulating trade, extend to capital indictment and execution. The constitution established money system and currency He wished to know gentlemen contended that, on this point, there was hiatus in the constitution In the message of General Washington to the second session of Congress, in 1790, the attention of Congress was called to the question of the currency and in 1791 the first Bank of the United States was chartered. He referred to the history of that bank to show that one of the objects of its establishment was to give to the country a sound currency He quoted Mr Hamilton's opinions on that point, from the third part of his advantages of a National Bank, as well as the sentiments of other distinguished statesmen, to prove, at the same time, that the bank was not created exclusively for revenue. The small Bank of the United States which was first established, he considered as having admirably performed its duties. He contended that no state bank could be regulated into an equality a with National Bank You might as easily turn satellite into one of the principle orbs. What was the object of establishing the late Bank of the United States ! There was sufficient revenue But the mo ney of the country lay sluggish in the channels of circulation it wanted currency. Mr. Madison, who was ready writer, but who found great difficulty in speaking, said he had never a copper in his So could draw for thousand pounds. we had no money, but we could draw. He recited the facts connected with the creation of the second bank Mr. Madison and the Secretary of the Treasury put this bank on the ground of its necessity, to furnish a general currency Their argument was, that a national medium and national currency could only be established by National Bank. He quoted some remarks then made by Mr Calhoun, to show that the Senator from South Carolina advocated the bank for the purpose of currency. No administration had exhibited more recognitions of this fact than that of General Jackson, whose first complaint against the U. S. Bank was that it had not performed its duty in keeping up sound currency And General Jackson made it one of the grounds for putting the deposites in the State Banks, that they would prove sufficient agents for sustaining the currency. The last message of General Jackson was marked with high tone of exultation on the success of the State Banka, and if they had not all gone in crush, we should have had repetition of that exulting strain in the late message. When this erisis took place, nothing was left but to undo what had been done, or to re-read the constitution, throw Madison, Hamilton. &c. in the back ground, and say, the regulation of our currency is put beyond our reach by the constitution. He contrasted the language used in 1806, with that used at this time. In the former case, the object was to relieve the people now it is only to relieve the government He next proceeded to examine for what purpose Congress was called together. He read from the message on this point to show that the object of the President was solely to provide for the safe keeping of the public money, and to provide for the deficiencies in the Treasury No unimportant corporation could hav pursued a policy more exclusively selfish than that pursued by this great corporation of government. The great question to be decided by the people is whether, except in the regulation of the gold and silver coin, has any thing to do with the currency We must go all one way or the other. We must be embraced m the gold and silver arms of the Senator from Missouri be hugged to his hard money breast, or go back to the tried and approved measures of government He thought the State Banks had been somewhat hardly used He was not one of their accusers, although he believed some of them were chargeable in the outset with giving very bad advice to the Secretary of the Treasury He did not concur to its full extent in the charge of overtrading He adverted to the remarkable inconsistency between the language of Mr Taney in 1833, and the language of this bill. Mr. Taney invited the banks to make loans to merchants, while this bill up the public money with triple keys, and if you lend dollar. you shall be pursued with indictment, and subjected to punishment, to pains and penalties: Government participated in the expansion, by inviting the banks to lend. The message of 1835, quoted the great sales of public lands proof of the prosperity of the country, and now these sales are set down to the charge of overtrading Mr HARLAN, of Kentucky, opposed the report of the majority of the Committee and Mr. BROWN supported it. Without taking the question, the House passed to the order of the day. DEPOSITE ACT. The House then proceeded to consider the " bill to postpone the fourth instalment of deposite with the States, reported last night, without amendment, from the Committee of the Whole Mr DAWSON who was entitled to the floor, yielded it to Mr CAMBRELENG, for the purpose of enabling that gentleman to make an explanation in reference-to an interogatory addressed to him by Mr. D., last night on the condition of the New York Banks Mr. CAMBRELENG having the permission of the gentleman from Georgia, said he would explain more fully his answer to one of that gentleman's questions, last evening, concerning the condition of the bauks in the State of New York. He did not mean to be understood that any of them strictly speaking, were insolvent, or that they could not ultimately pay all their notes. Mr C had referred to the Dry Dock Bank, which was placed by the chancellor in the hands of receivers, and to the heavy losses sustained by many of the banks in the late revulsion. By reference to the Treasury Report, it would be seen that one of the city banks alone had $1,200,000 of suspended debt yet even that bank would, in a few years, restore its capital to its original amount, by its collections and profits. He had merely intended to express that the actual capitals of many of the banks had been diminished dur ing the revulsion. He begged to be understood as entertaining no hostile feelings towards the gentlemen interested in those institutions, nor to banks as the mere agents of trade, but to that legislation which is perpetually and improperly interfering with this as well as other branches of trade. His hostility was exclusively directed to this mischievous and corrupting interference with the business of men, which was not among the legitimate duties of Government. Mr. DAWSON then concluded his remarks in opposition to the bill, and went on to point out what he con ceived to be its partial effects Mr TOWNS replied to his colleague on the particular points referred to by that gentleman. till Mr. GRAVES spoke at length against the bill about 3 o'clock, when he gave way to a Mr. PHILLIPS, who moved that the House take recess. After some conversation on the subject and various motions, it was finally ordered that the House take a recess for one hour. and hereafter that it take a recess from half past till 4 o'clock. In the evening session.