Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
CONDITION OF BANKS. MR. KILBURN'S REPORT. Danger, He Says, in the Methods of Some Trust Companies. Albany, Jan, 4 (Special).- his annual report to the legislature F. D. Kilburn, State Superintendent of Banks, says that fifteen trust companies, having a combined capital of $7,900, 000, and nearly an equal amount of paid-in surplus, were organized during the year ended September 30 last, and in the same time previously authorized trust companies increased their capital in the sum of $4,100,000. Besides this, one company. with a capital and paid-in surplus aggregating $2,000,000, was authorized in October, two companies are at present proceeding to increase their capital. and a dozen or more applications to establish trust companies have been submitted. either tentatively or formally, several of which have been denied, while others remain under consideration This was the neteworthy feature in the business of the department for the year. From July 1, 1901, to July 1. 1902, the increase in capital was nearly $6,000,000, in surplus and undivided profits over $15,000,000. and in total resources over $100,000,000. Prosperity was enjoyed by the companies generally for the entire year, and still continues. Mr. Kilburn says: In this respect there seems to be no ground for apprehension in any quarter, but that all of the companies of recent organization are presecuting business along lines which consist with dignity and that non -interference with other institution particularly savings banks which ought to obtain, is not so sure. I refer particularly to an unseemly striving by a small number of trust companies of comparatively recent organization to gain deposits of a char acter belonging properly to savings banks only Not only should trust companies not have these accounts, but the methods employed in some instances to attract them reflect upon the institutions by reason of having a tendency to cheapen them in the public estimation. Theoretically, at least, trust companies are established mainly to fill a field within which banks cannot act. and their transactions are naturally expected to be on a large scale. For them, then, of to betray an anxiety to multiply accounts only a dollar or two, or even of five or ten dollars each. and almost to canvass from house to house for them, is sort of business that must humiliate, and which, if the law gave power to me in the premises, I would certainly require to be discontinued. In nearly every city, except New-York, where a trust company has been organized of late, and which contains savings bank the withdrawals of money from the savings banks in the few months following the beginning of business by the trust company have exceeded the deposits In some cases this showing results undoubtedly from a transfer of investr ent accounts from the savings banks to the trust companies, which is not only quite legitimate but altogether desirable Accounts of this character ought never to have been taken by sa wings banks, and I have endeavored throughout my administration to bring about their elimination But for trust companies to solicit deposits that are savings, and to bid against the savings banks for them, violates the spirit of the law certainly and in degree discredits the trust company and constitutes possible danger to it. The depositors who open such accounts are peculiarly susceptible to alarm and panic, and when their fears are once aroused it becomes impossible soon to allay them They are incalculably more liable than the average business men to start a run, and, having started it, will continue it longer and with more violent demonstrations. The savings banks have abundant means of protection against such demonstrations, by reason of their power to require a sixty days notice of intention to withdraw deposit: but let crowd of wild and excited men and women present themselves at the doors of trust mpany, and it would be marvellous If it were able to escape suspension. The record of banks of deposit and discount, the report continues, has been quite different from that of trust companies. This difference has not been as regards safety and prosperity, but a variety of causes has contributed to a decrease in their number, and also to an ap parent reduction in their total assets Three were taken over by national banks, three were absorbed by trust companies which were organized to succeed them. five were merged in other State banks, and four went into the national system by conversion. Two of the latter were the largest State banks in the State outside of New-York City, having an aggregate of resources considerably exceeding $20,000,000. The understanding is that they made the change solely that they might receive money from the United States Treasury on deposit Besides these changes, three other banks were formally entered in the list of closed banks. Thirteen State banks were organized during the fiscal year, six of which are in New-York City. Their combined capital is $975,000. The number of discount banks which reported to the department in September, under the final call in the fiscal year, was 194, which, however, included four that had some time before ceased to do active business and two that closed before the end of the month, while one that had not then begun business is not included. The aggregate capital of the banks reporting was $26,715.700. their combined surplus and undivided profits $29,811,018, and their aggregate resources $351, 716,184 which is almost exactly the amount shown by the reports of corresponding date in 1900, but is $52,000,000 below the aggregate in September 1901, when it was the largest, with one exception, that had been reported in thirtysix years. Allowing for the assets of the banks that went out of the system in the year, the condition of those remaining approximates very closely to that reported by them the year before. One hundred and twenty-seven savings banks reported July 1, 1902, a reduction of one from the number reporting six months before. Onethe Empire State Savings Bank, Buffalohas gone into liquidation with arrangements to pay its depositors in full. According to the reports of the remaining savings banks as of July 1. 1902, the amount due depositors had apparently increased in one year by the sum of $64,067,378 to $1,051,689,186, but since the Empire State Savings Bank is not included the real increase was $65,428,825. Only twice in the history of the savings banks of this State has a larger growth been made in one year. BUILDING LOAN ASSOCIATIONS. In the fiscal year four of the so-called national building and loan associations of this State were placed in the hands of receivers at the instance of the Superintendent of Banks, and a receiver was appointed for a fifth by the United States court. Few of the associations of the State now do business on the expense fund plan, and the officers of almost all these have promised to discontinue the practice at an early date, and to amend their articles of association accordingly. Any increase in the number o second mortgage institutions is now