Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
COLLUSION, SAY DEPOSITORS. EXCITING MEETING OF HARLEM RIVER BANK CHENTE OPENLY CHARGING A CLOSE UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RECEIVE? SICKERS AND A MAN WHO SEEMED TO KNOW ALL ABOUT THE DEPOSITS, AND CPFERED TO BUY UP SOME OF THEM The Interesting statement was made at last night's meeting of the depositors and shareholders of the defunct Harlem River Bank held in Lenz's Hall. No. 2,011 Third-ave. that James Gamble. of Nos 11 and 13 William-st., had offered to buy up several deposits at 75 cents on the dollar. These men declare they were approached: John J. Benzing No. 1,885 Third-ave. J. A Alvarez, No. 1,350 Lexington ave.: Lowenstein & Griot, Adler & Semme, Herman Stephan, No. 2,108 Third-ave. and M. W. Libas, men's furnishing goods. Nos. 140 and 142 Nassau-st. Mr. Adler of Adler & Semme, showed a letter from Mr. Gamble, concluding "Check for $108 ready." Mr. Adier added that Mr. Gamble had obtained the exact amount of the firm's deposit. Mr. Alvarez made a similar statement, and both statements produced great excitement in a meeting which seemer at fever-heat throughout the evening Chairman Peetach unhesitatingly pronounced the evidence on that point as showing collusion between Receiver Sickets and Mr. Gamble "Our committee," he exclaimed "received the cold shoulder when we asked Mr. Sickels for a list of the depositors, and yet this man Gamble knows even the amount of our depositors." Scores of the depositors crowded around the men who had been approached by Mr. Gamble, and loudly denounced Receiver Sickels for his alleged collusion, and T. W. Schlosser brought out Mr. A1varez's statement in urging the meeting to allow a committee of ten. which had been just appointed, to engage counsel who would force the legal rights of the depositors, despite Mr. Sickels. He had told earlier in the evening that a committee appointed at the previous meeting received scant courtesy at the hands of Mr. Sickels, and then read the resolution offered by the committee. It was signed by M Vogel, J: C. Alten, T. W. Schlosser, T. Johnson and A. Gross. It complained of extraordinary delay of winding up the bank's affairs and continued "It is not quite plain to us how said bank would fall unless there was mismanagement or neglect of duty somewhere on the part of the officers or directors The resolutions suggested the employment of counsel to convict and punish any officers of the bank against whom evidence could be obtained. This committee was appointed: C. J. Rielly, J. Ott, J. C. Alten, M. Vogel, John C. Patton, A. Frank, E. Jacobson, G. Basine, J. Hooks and F. Gass. In the discussion which followed the members could not agree as to allowing this committee to employ counsel at once. They wanted the committee to see lawyers first and report back at the next meeting. All the speakers were severe on Receiver Sickels, Mr. Alten saying that receiverships were political jobs anyhow. He wanted to know what good the depositors had of the $2,500 spent for looking over the books for two months. He added: Mr. Sickels has not done anything whatever.' Mr. Baum, a lawyer, Interrupted by stating that Mr. Sickels had written him about the bank's affairs. He had been about the only man who during the night said anything in Mr. Sickels's favor, and when some one present shouted back at him: "Perhaps Sickels sent you here." the members present cheered and jeered. Mr. Baum finally got the floor afte- a struggle, and yelled back: You're d- liar.' When quiet was restored Mr. Well a moved that the committee be empowered to urge the District-Attorney and the Grand Jury to indict several officers of the bank. 'Bookkeeper Kean,' he added, "Is included and ought to be brought back from Canada at the State's expense, not ours. One of our depositors has evidence against one of the officers in a matter of $4,500. There is other evidence obtainable, and we ought to have it acted upon." Mr. Schlosser thought that that would take time, and that their efforts now should be to save whatever money they could by employing a lawyer to get it. The chairman and Mr. Alten made speeches, claiming collusion, and said it would great.y hurt their chances of ever getting anything. Both directly named Mr. Sickels. The committee were empowered to wait upon the District-Attorney and to confer with lawyers and report back at the meeting to be held next Wednesday, July 25.