13480. Farmers State Bank (Petersburg, NE)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
March 14, 1930
Location
Petersburg, Nebraska (41.853, -98.079)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
6c2d287b

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles (Mar 1930) report the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg is in the hands of a receiver and the receiver has sued former directors for short/doubtful loans. No mention of a depositor run in the texts; failure attributed to large amount of slow/doubtful paper. Thus this is a suspension leading to permanent closure/receivership.

Events (2)

1. March 14, 1930 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
R. O. Brownell, receiver for the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg is the plaintiff ... The bank has been in the hands of the receiver for some time and the state proposes to hold the former directors to their pledge or guarantee.
Source
newspapers
2. * Suspension
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
State banking department found the bank held about $160,045 in slow and doubtful loans; directors had guaranteed notes but large uncollected balance remained (~$100,000).
Newspaper Excerpt
The bank has been in the hands of the receiver for some time
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Albion News, March 6, 1930

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Directors of Failed Farmers Bank Petersburg Are Made the Defendants Suit was instituted in the district court for Boone county last Friday volving more than one hundred thousand dollars. Brownell, receiver for the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg the plaintiff and Barak, Edwin Evans, Henry Arp, Chas. Preusser, Martin Thorberg, B. Koenig, Juelson and Wm. Koch are the defendants. E. Perry of coln and Vail of Albion are the attorneys for the plaintiff, who actin his official capacity as bank ceiver. Prior to October 26, 1921, the defendants named in this case the principal owners, directors and chief managing officers of the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg. According to the petition filed by the plaintiff it was found that the bank held certain notes aggregating $160,banking partment considered slow and doubtful paper. The petition further sets forth that the directors of the bank, desiring to retain control of the institution, to repair the capital and maintain the bank going concern, tered an agreement with the state banking department wherein they guaranteed the notes held in question by the department. Since that agreement was entered into about $60,000 has been realized on the notes, leaving uncollected sum trifle in excess of $100,000. The bank has been in the hands of the receiver for some time and the state purposes to hold the former directors to their pledge or guarantee. The case one of the most important civil action ever instituted in the county, involving as it does SO large sum of money.


Article from The Humphrey Democrat, March 14, 1930

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

R. 0. Brownell, Receiver, Files Suit For $100,000 Suit was instituted in the district court for Boone county last Friday involving more than one hundred thousand dollars. R. O. Brownell, receiver for the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg is the plaintiff and A. J. Barak, Edwin Evans, Henry Arp. Chas. Preusser, Martin Thorberg, J. B. Koenig, S. M. Juelson and Wm. N. Koch are the defendants. E. B. Perry of Lincoln and H. C. Vail of Albion are the attorneys for the plaintiff. who is acting in his official capacity as bank receiver. Prior to October 26, 1921, the defendants named in this case were the principal owners, directors and chief managing officers of the Farmers State Bank of Petersburg. According to the petition filed by the plaintiff it was found that the bank held certain notes aggregating $160,045.39, which the state banking department considered slow and doubtful paper. The petition further sets forth that the directors of the bank, desiring to retain control of the institution, to repair the capital and maintain the bank as a going concern, entered In agreement with the state banking department wherein they guaranteed the notes held in question by the department. Since that agreement was entered into about $60,000 has been realized on the notes, leaving uncollected a sum a trifle in excess of $100,000. The bank has been In the hands of the receiver for some time and the state proposes to hold the former directors to their pledge or guarantee. The case is one of the most important civit actions ever instituted in the county, involving as it does 80 large a sum of money.-Albion News. Allow mud stains to dry and brush carefully before any other treatment. Sometimes nothing else is needed. Or if the fabric is washable, use soap and water. On other fabrics, try sponging with wood alcohol, denatured alcohol, or plain water. Mud stains may be taken off black silks of firm weare by rubbing the spot with a cut raw potato. The thin film of starch left by the potato can be brushed off when dry. This treatment is not recommended for any other materials. It leaves a spot on any except black fabrics. I'd like to know how long distance telephone operators always know when I am taking a bath.