Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
THE
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST PREFERRED PAYMENT.
A Large Number of Citizens at Monday Night's MeetingStatement by Delmar Dail
The city's claim against the First National Bank here discussed Monday night at the hall by citizens of Marceline. Whether the city should make ery effort possible to obtain ferred claim on its was point discussed. More than 100 citizens met with the city officials for an open cussion of the matter. Delmar Dail, city attorney, read detailed statement which he had prepared for The News and which outlined the city's position in the case. This statement is published in full in this edition of The News. Speakng upon behalf of the other depositors of the bank were Holmes, Botkins, Roscoe Carter, Steve Landreth, Howard Lillingston, B. R. Olin, John Dieterich, Kendrick, Dr. Ola man, and several other citizens of Marceline. Mr. Dail explained that at the time of the closing of the bank here the city had on deposit in that bank little more than Mr. Dail, as city attorney, has filed with the comptroller of currency petition for preferred claim this meaning that the city asking for 100 cents on the lar from its deposit in the First National Bank. Mr. Dail explained further that no legal action of any kind had been taken against the bank reply had been received from the comptroller of currency regarding the status of the city's claim. An ordinance was passed several weeks providing for the employment of Jack Jones, Carrollton lawyer, should the city decide to file suit for preferred claim. Mr. Holmes pointed out that the "blue print" posters which had been displayed about town were itors of the First National and not to the citizens in general. Mr. Holmes believed that the should take its chances along with the other depositors of the bank. He added that there should have been sufficient precedents established to show whether or not the city really had preferred claim on its deposit. Mr. Dail then read statement from the comptroller of currency outlining what constituted preferred claim. It was brought out by Mr. Dail that should suit be filed by the city the funds of the bank would not necessarily be tied up, that any and all dividends could be paid soon as sufficient money had been collected by the bank's receiver. In answer to question by Botkin as to why the city's deposit in the First Natonal Bank was not bonded, Mr. Dail replied that pository bond could not be obtained, not only on the bank here but on other banks in this section of the state. Mr. Holmes then said that regardless of who won, the city the other depositors of the bank, that the depositors themselves would have to pay all costs of the Htigation. Mr. Dail replied that suit were filed and carried through by the Carrollton lawyer that the attorney would receive cent of the claim, or per the suit was won but would not receive cent the city lost the suit. Steve Landreth said the city's dollars were not worth any more than the dollars of the other depositors and that the suit were taken through the federal courts there would be delay of two or three years. Mr. Dail replied that most of the city officials were positors in the First National Bank and that there was no assurance the present time that there would be any suit filed. Howard Lillingston pointed out that by permitting the bank's funds to be distributed soon the funds were available and by not tieing up the funds by litigation, depositors then could start off their bills and business paying in the community would be vived.
In answer to question by Botkin as to why the money was in the First National deposited Thomas replied that Bank, Mayor had existed for sevan agreement whereby the First eral years tional was to receive the funds and the Marcelof city Bank of the ine State city funds. little humor was injected into (Continued on