Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
An election will be held on the 19th inst. (next Monday), for the purpose of electing a county school board of five members to represent the school interests of all of Klamath county. This means a great deal to every taxpayer and men of families, and it behooves every voter of this class to go to their polling places and vote, and to pick the very best man for the place, one who will make a study of the school laws and what is required of him in this capacity.
As a voter and tax payer of the section now known as School District No. 52. in which the town of Chiloquin is located, I wish to say that I am against the election of Chas. R. Bowman, who is a candidate as a director. My reasons for opposing this gentleman are not personal, but strictly upon the grounds that he is unfitted and not competent to fill the place.
Mr. Rowman was a member of the school board up to the change made recently by the people, whereby the old method of school control was given to a board of five members, representative of the five districts.
# TWO ARCHITECTS RETAINED
While he served upon the old board in the Chiloquin district this is what occurred:
First, from a bonded school fund of $35,000, which was voted more than two years ago to erect a school house at Chiloquin. The architect, G. R. Wright of Klamath Falls, who had a legal contract for drawing plans for the construction, was let out, or ignored, and another architect, a Mr. Coseboom, wag employed. Wright was to receive something like $1,600, so I am informed, for his services upon completion of said building, plans of which had been accepted. Wright has received $900 of his compensation, and in view of the fact of his asking full settlement as per contract, he has agreed to accept $225 more in settlement in full of his claim.
I am informed that Coseboom has received $400 upon his contract as second architect, and will get a fee when the building is complete of about $1.200 or $1.500.
Why was Wright fired?
Why was the paid the money herein mentioned if he is incompetent?
Why was Coseboom employed?
Why are twice the architectural fees to be paid for this school plant that are necessary?
Did Chas. R. Bowman do this?
I am not saying, but he was one of the board, and the only one running for office of the old board.
# $15,000 IN DEFUNCT BANK
Second, of the school fund of $30,000 that was in two of the banks, the First National bank and the American National bank of Klamath Falls, $15,000 in each bank, the $16,000 that was in the First National bank was withdrawn and deposited in the First State and Savings bank just a short time before said bank went into insolvency. Why this move, and where does the school board see in the change a benefit; taking the people's money from a safe institution and putting it into one that was indeed not safe in the eyes of most business people who were on the cutside, looking in?
Third, why was this money deposited in the banks to the credit of the school board and school clerk and withdrawn by a joint check? I am informed the county treasurer is the legal care-taker of school funds, and it should have been in his care and be responsible under his bond. But he, the treasurer, states that he at no time ever had this money in his possession, nor was it ever tendered him by the school board, therefore disclaims any legat or other responsibility.
# ONLY PART OF FUND AVAILABLE
Was the money expended and otherwise disposed of in a legal manner, and by the properly authorized persons? Out of this bonded fund, I think I can safely say not to exceed $11,500, or less, 18 now available.
For the $23,500 we have the following to show: