Farmers State Bank (Overton, NE)

Episode Information

Episode UID
9496672491578
Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
trust
Bank ID
949667249 hash
Start Date
June 29, 1931
Location
Overton, Nebraska (40.739, -99.538)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
cb01b584202bb82b

Response Measures

None

Description

Article states the bank was insolvent and already under control of the state banking department; duplicate articles included.

Events (2)

1. June 29, 1931 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
State Department of Trade and Commerce had taken control of the insolvent bank and appointed a receiver.
Newspaper Excerpt
such bank was then under the control and direction of the state department.
Source
newspapers
2. * Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
a receiver had been named for the bank. Arthur A. Foreman ... executed $20,000 mortgage ... Wells brought foreclosure proceedings, and the lower court named W. R. Smith as receiver several months after a receiver had been named for the bank.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Lincoln Journal Star, June 29, 1931

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANKING DEPARTMENT WINS Supreme Court Says Bank Receiver Controls Mortgaged Property. The banking department won in supreme court Monday, when the tribunal held that where certain mortgaged property of an insolvent bank is already under the control and direction of the department of trade and commerce and has been appointed therefor, a court is without authority to another to the mortgaged property. It holds that the provisions the law the naming of a where mortgaged property is in danger of being materially injured and is insuffient to pay the mortgage debt are inapplicable, where such property with all other assets of an insolvent bank were in the hands of the receiver named to take charge of its affairs and such bank was then under the control and direction of the state department. Arthur A. Foreman, president and principal stockholder of the Farmers State bank of Overton, executed $20,000 mortgage on farm lands to W. A. Wells, the transaction being in essence loan to the bank. Wells brought foreclosure and the lower court named W. R. Smith as receiver several months after a receiver had been named for the bank. As this property was under the latter's control at the time the court says the trial court had no authority to name a second receiver.


Article from Lincoln Journal Star, June 29, 1931

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANKING DEPARTMENT WINS Supreme Court Says Bank Receiver Controls Mortgaged Property. The banking department won in supreme court Monday, when the tribunal held that where certain mortgaged property of an insolvent bank is already under the control and direction of the department of trade and commerce and a receiver has been appointed therefor, court is without authority to appoint another receiver to manage the mortgaged property. It holds that the provisions of the law authorizing the naming of a receiver where mortgaged property is in danger of being materially injured and is insuffient to pay the mortgage debt are inapplicable, where such property with all other assets an insolvent bank were in the hands of the receiver named to take charge of its affairs and such bank then under the control and direction of the state department. Arthur A. Foreman, president and principal stockholder of the Farmers State bank of Overton, executed $20,000 mortgage on farm lands to W. A. Wells, the transaction being in essence loan to the bank. Wells brought foreclosure proceedings, and the lower court named W. R. Smith as receiver several months after a receiver had been named for the bank. As this property was under the latter's control at the time the supreme court says the trial court had no authority to name a second receiver.