United States Savings Bank (Topeka, KS)

Episode Information

Episode UID
9169691791101
Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
savings
Bank ID
916969179 hash
Start Date
September 1, 1891*
Location
Topeka, Kansas (39.048, -95.678)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
3d8208161314e776

Response Measures

None

Description

OCR corrected March %4 to March 24 in article 1; bank already in receivership from Sept 1891.

Events (3)
1. September 1, 1891* Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
the United States Savings bank, which failed in September, 1891
Source
newspapers
2. March 24, 1893 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Major William Sims, receiver of the United States Savings bank, which failed in September, 1891, announced that he was ready to make a 15 per cent payment to the 430 depositors.
Source
newspapers
3. December 21, 1893 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Judge Hazen has made a decision that the assets of the defunct United States savings bank, of Topeka, are not subject to taxation.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)
1. March 31, 1893 The Goodland Republic Goodland, KS
Article from The Goodland Republic, March 31, 1893

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Money For Failed Bank Depositors. TOPEKA, March %4.-Major William Sims, receiver of the United States Savings bank, which failed in September, 1891, announced that he was ready to make a 15 per cent payment to the 430 depositors. The receipts amount to $46,891. 70, the disbursements to $37,101.09 and the cash on hand to $9,790.61.

2. December 23, 1893 Baxter Springs News Baxter Springs, KS
Article from Baxter Springs News, December 23, 1893

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Not Subject to Taxation. TOPEKA. Kan, Dec. 21.-In the district court of this county Judge Hazen has made a decision that the assets of the defunctUnited States savings bank, of Topeka, are not subject to taxation. The receiver of the bank brought suit for an injunction to restrain the collection of the tax assessed this year, which Judge Hazen allowed on the ground that while the st ck of the bank is subject to taxation, it would be unjust to assess both the stock and the assets.