National Park Bank (New York, NY)

Episode Information

Episode UID
89101180
Episode Type
Suspension β†’ Closure
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
8910 national
Charter Number
891
Start Date
April 16, 1898
Location
New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
958902f7e186b559

Response Measures

None

Description

A court-appointed receiver is explicitly named for the bank in 1898.

Events (3)

1. March 14, 1865 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. April 16, 1898 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
National Park Bank-Horace Craighead.
Source
newspapers
3. May 11, 1905 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Copies of the injunction were served here on the ... National Park Bank
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

Article from New-York Tribune, April 16, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# REFEREES APPOINTED. Supreme Court. By Bischoff, jr., J. Calman agt. Casey-Ralph G. Miller. Stevens agt. D'Amora-George F. Langbein, Matter of Schermerhorn-William J. A. McKim. Jockel agt. McCormack-William J. A. McKim. Prall agt. Hall-Richard H. Mitchell. Lichtenstein agt. Hammerstein-Richard H. Mitchell. Matter of J. B. Pace Tobacco Company-George C. Austin. By Freedman, J. Lord agt. Smith-Abram Kling. By Stover, J. Ehret agt. Theiss-Edwin Blumenstiel. # RECEIVERS APPOINTED. Supreme Court. By Bischoff, jr., J. Emil Calman agt. Samuel Casey-Julian M. Isaacs, Rubin Spitelink agt. Louis Subitzky-Joseph I. Erenstoft. By Freedman, J. National Park Bank-Horace Craighead.


Article from New-York Tribune, May 10, 1905

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RECEIVERS HERE ALSO. Local Banks and Trust Companies Restrained from Paying. Judge Lacombe, in the United States Circuit Court, yesterday afternoon signed an order appointing J. D. Colt, of Boston, and Walter D. Edmunds, of No. 31 Nassau-st., this city, ancillary receivers of the Haight & Freese Company, fixing their bond at $10,000. The court also granted an order restraining New-York banks and trust companies from paying out any money deposited in the name of the alleged bankrupts, or that of William H Lillis, George G. Turner, Harry Watson, Charles B. Poor, jr., William G. Conklin, - Beardesley, John Doe and Richard Roe. The appointment of the receivers was secured by Roger Foster, of No. 15 Broad-st., who filed with the court three affidavits, which contain charges against the company. One. made by Ridgeway Bowker, of Camden, N. J., states that he deposited $5,500 with the concern's Philadelphia offices, and alleges he was induced by George W. Turner to permit a man named Daniels to manipulate his account. He further alleges that on January 11, 1903, his account was without warning closed out. Bowker swears that the concern bought and sold no stocks whatsoever, and made up fictitious accounts of alleged stock transactions which were given to its customers. The Haight & Freese Company, the affidavit declares. had more than five thousand customers, whose claims amounted to more than $1,000,000. An affidavit made by Arthur M. Johnson, of No. 502 West 152a-st., stated that he had been employed by the company in various capacities and in a number of the offices. Johnson also swore that no stocks were bought and sold on margins for customers and explained at great length the method employed by the managers in making up the alleged fictitious sales accounts so that each customer would be a loser. A similar affidavit, made by John M. Warwick, another employe, purported to corroborate the statements of both Bowker and Johnson as to the methods employed by the concern. Receiver Edmunds late in the afternoon took possession of the company's local offices, at Broadway and Exchange Place. Mr. Foster, who is counsel for the receiver. said later that the appointment of a receiver had been asked for on the ground that the Haight & Freese Company was insolvent and on the additional ground of fraud. "It is charged." continued Mr. Foster. "that the brokerage business of Haight & Freese was entirely fletitious. The firm took orders to buy and sell stocks for customers and never executed these orders. The orders. in other words. were bucketed. Fraud on customers and abstraction of assets by officers are charged. Every customer who ever gave an order to this firm can be a creditor of the firm. "Some assets have been found in the Seaboard and in the Consolidated National banks. but they will not meet the debts. Bowker, I understand, made his trades through the Philadelphia office of the concern, but that does not affect the issue in any way." The offices of the Haight & Freese Company were crowded all the morning. but toward noon, when news of the Boston court proceedings became known, a line of customers formed to withdraw their accounts. Harvey Watson, the local manager. said early in the afternoon that steps were being taken to get the Boston receivership vacated. "We do not know why this suit for a receiver was brought, added Mr. Watson. "It is evidently a matter of spite. Mrs. Welss formerly had an account with the Boston house, but we settled with her some time ago, and she signed a release. No claims were made upon us. and we do not know what she wants. Our counsel in Boston tells us that the court must have been imposed on in getting the receivership. Here in New-York, and everywhere else, we are paying all claims made upon us. Some of our customers here. when they heard about the trouble in Boston, came to us for their money. and we have paid them promptly. Some of them have reopened accounts with us since they have talked with us over the matter. We have been here fifteen years. and we have always paid every just claim. I understand that the main executive office in Boston is making a formal statement." The Haight & Freese Company has been well known for years as a broker in stocks and grain on margin. It advertises extensively. and has many branch offices and correspondents throughout the country. It was formerly a member of the Consolidated Exchange, but now has no local exchange connections. The most recent number of "The Corporation Directory" gives the directors of the concern as William B. Sommerville, George G. Turner and John M. Campbell, who are named respectively as president, secretary and treasurer. The capital is given as $100,000.


Article from The Sun, May 11, 1905

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

TIE UP HAIGHT & FREESE CASH YESTERDAY'S MAIL.THOUGH.GOT AWAY FROM RECEIVERS. Nuggets of Good Size Said to Have Been Found In Several Places-Exchange Firms Named by Turner as Having Done Business for the Concern In 1902 The Haight & Freese Company of 53 Broadway, whose pretended transactions in buying and selling stocks and bonds were held recently by Supreme Court Justice Dowling to be mere bookkeeping entries, got into more trouble yesterday. A receiver appointed by the Federal courts of Pennsylvania took possession of its large office in the Bourse Building in Philadelphia, and simultaneously in this city, Boston and Philadelphia counsel for the receivers and creditors began a search for the assets, employing Pinkerton detectives In Philadelphia the concern began at 8 o'clock to pay off depositors. They kept paying for an hour and then announced that they had received word from the New York officers to stop payments. According to the counsel for the receivers, the daily receipts of the offices have been as much as $100,000 a day. Roger Foster and W. P. Maloney. the counsel for the receivers. believe that large sums of money have been deposited in safe deposit vaults in the three cities in the names of inembers of the concern. Turner and Lillis. the chief members. it was said, came here vesterday. but they couldn't be found. In all three cities copies of the injunction order tying up the assets were served on practically every safe deposit company. Mr. Maloney said in the afternoon that $200,000 had been found in one safe deposit concern in Philadelphia Copies of the injunction were served here on the Hanover Bank. the Colonial Bank. the Columbia Bank the Bankers' Trust Company. the National Park Bank and the Seaboard SEM About ou that pics SUM 71 Bank found at most of these banks. At the Seaboard the concern recently had $150,000. Yesterday only $25,000 was found there. At the Colonial Bank $3,000 was found. It was also found. the leaders said, that members of the concern had several checks certified at the latter bank yesterday beforethe injunction was served. Mr. Foster said that he understood that a stop order had been put on the checks. It was reported that the concern had $200,000 in the Long Island Trust Company, and a law clerk hustled over there in an automobile and tied up whatever there was. An attempt to vacate the receivership here was made before Justice Lacombe vesterday by Franklin Bien representing the company. Justice Lacombe refused to grant any of Mr. Bien's motions but gave him leave to renew them on Friday on the argument over a permanent receivership. Charles H. A. Dougherty, a custom house broker. of 68 Wall st reet, through James C. Lenny filed a petition in involuntary bankruptey against the company, stating that he was a creditor for $1,656 and alleging on information and belief that the creditors of the company were less than twelve in number. If they are more than twelve in number more than one must petition. Counsel for the receiver say they don't believe the application will be granted. According to the testimony of Charles G. Turner in the Haight suit upon which Justice Dowling decided that the concern was a bucketshop the Haight& Freese Company has been doing business with several New York Stock Exchange houses. Turner refused to name these, giving as his reason business Sujop really SEAL the 1941 as a competitor of the New York Stock Exchange and that he didn't want to get the firms into trouble with the exchange. Justice Dowling, however. compelled him to name the Stock Exchange firms, and he testified that in 1902. when Haight had his account with the company the company I'll M Owens P Beers 47TM business PIP Stow & Co., Cohen. Green & Co., S. V. White, Hunter & Schumacher and George 1 Landon & Co. Several of these concerns -OJ 10 JO not euo? easy organized since 1902 Yesterday the lawyers for the receiver served copies of the T ΠΈ a (Wems) y Beers uo Stow & Co. Beers & Owens admitted that the company had an account with them state B have pToM Seq: pres pue MOTE ment of it prepared W. L. Stow & Co., which is a reorganization of the firm of f902. denied ever having done business for the company It came out yesterday that the Haight MOJ SR e root Β₯ as $10 to huy 10 shares A majority of its customers were tradesmen and mechanics dollars. perpuny mej R dn person peq our Claims from such persons aggregating $70,000 have been filed with Mr Maloney. em clients (hese Time business Sujop UI company had them sign a contract read1201 When stocks are purchased this order may be executed in any city or place, whether on any exchange. through a member pus sept su 01 pum Joesey or by private purchase, as the Haight &