Bank of Baltimore - Baltimore, MD

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: state
Start Date: March 4, 1861
Location: Baltimore, Maryland (39.290, -76.612)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 2ad37d09

Response Measures

None

Description

OCR-heavy article (The Daily Exchange, 1861-03-04) contains a court entry: a bill of injunction was filed against the Bank of Baltimore and a receiver appointed. No mention of a depositor run is present. The text is noisy; I corrected obvious OCR errors when extracting the snippet. Because a receiver was appointed and no run is described, I classify this as a suspension/closure (receiver assigned).

Events (2)

1. March 4, 1861 Other

Newspaper Excerpt: Bill of injunction filed for a dissolution ... Injunction granted and receiver appointed (indicates legal proceedings leading to receivership).
Source: newspapers

2. March 4, 1861 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: Brinckmeyer vs. Charles filed Brinckmeyer for an ... the Bank of Baltimore. Bill of injunction and receiver appointed. Injunction granted and receiver Van Hox... (The Daily Exchange, 1861-03-04).
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (1)

1. March 4, 1861 The Daily Exchange Baltimore, MD

Article from The Daily Exchange, March 4, 1861

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

LA W INTELLIGENCE. CRIMINAL COURT-JUDGE BOND. against John Sullivan, charged with a A case August Gefferman, was been stetted, exposed fine assault and costs having already 25 State V8. to an with an assault upon William of cents attachment. upon Philipiaa costs. Brengle.- Harwick, State charged guilty. Fined $20 and Adjudged Harwick, charged with exposure her guilty of V8. Philipina His Honor also adjudged for one her and costs. of and imposed a fine of $25 month this person. charge, imprisoned trial and her upon the was called for failed to John of an assault upon his wife, charge the second time, his answer McCullough for recognizance but His under hav wife ing been forfeited on Saturday had not last. been put contended that before her husband Justice Duncan, but, charged on the recognizance that functionary had actually husband, contrary, of $13 for a release for her that her the sum that the case was compromised the by statestating Justice Duncan contradicted remarked that process. the woman, but his Honor and ment thought of the man had already paid Thomas enough Denny negro. he he was would adjudged therefore not guilty dismiss The of him. an case assault of Philip upon Joseph Blays, charged Cromwell, with an assault upon The .Guy, case was was called, then and a motion to stet overruled. State V8. Frank continued James until Arnold Saturday and next. Henry Krebs, discharge charged Scott, resisting officer Sahn in the a prisonwith duty, attempting to rescue His Honor of his also with assaulting the officer. guilty; er, and Krebs not guilty. Frank Scott and costs. adjudged two months and fined $1 and as to Arnold; imprisoned three and costs. John H. Harris, a negro as. imprisoned Guilty $1 months of fined placed upon trial upon the charge The assault, boy, was William Pleyman (negro). one, saulting was clearly shown, was a very severe committed with a loaded cane. and being one month and fined Harker Bradley and Milton which guilty; imprisoned William Frank Adjudged $1 costs. adjudged guilty of an assault upon each.were Rathburne, and fined $5 and costs sixteen a young lad about years was tried upon the charge of that age, Ricard with a billy. It was and in a drunken not of John Sebastian Baugher, originated shown frolic, assaulting the therefore adjudged the GerFrancis Keine, a miserable his the guilty.- difficulty Court assault looking accused was adjudged guilty of an months upon and was committed to jail for two Edward cents and costs. The case man, wife, fined and of Marina, 25 charged with a brutal assault one month, upon his who was enciente, was committed for State vs. wife, to the serious illness of his wife. charged with assaulti g that the accused was rid of owing wasshown Louis and Rinehart, continuallying of getting his wife. court, fined It his Honor, for the purpose jail for one year and him, him 25 committed cents and him costs. to State V8. Primrose, Jane Barton, both with an assault upon Mary to the charged His Honor committed them The case of John Tippet, negresses. both small boy, charged almshouse. an assault upon Zacheus Morrow, a Washington continued until Saturday next. was fined $10 and costs upon a his in a case of Pennington was with of assault forfei- upon Christian Baker was of an assault upon Anna ture Mary not (guilty Snyder. recognizance, Buecher. with adjudged of Adeline Weaver, charged an until asSaturday next. The sault case upon Margaret Revel, was continued with Peter Buckleman, charged for assault upon Ann Taran, and Ann Taran, a upon Buckleman. His $25 and imposed a fine to Buckleman an cross-assault guilty Honor of adjudged and costs. Mrs. Taran not guilty, and prosecutor Adjourned pay costs. Total fine and costs $33.42. until this morning at 11 o'clock. CIRCUIT COURT-JUDGE KREBS. CITY Brinckmeyer vs. Charles filed Brinckmeyer for an inHenry the Bank of Baltimore. Bill of junction and and receiver, and for a dissolution appointed. partnership. Injunction granted and receiver Van HoxElizabeth Van Hoxar V8. Henry G. Bill filed for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii Pendlear. defendant. Gunther and others vs. under curia. from ton et al. Argued and concluded. Held SUPERIOR COURT-JUDG MARTIN. on Saturday. This tribunal was engaged with Equity business OF COMMON PLEAS-JUDGE MARSHALL Pool. G. Geo. COURT W. Moore and Joseph Berry V8. Eli A. from Alexander.: Not concluded. Brown Appeal vs. Robert Crothers. Plaintiff's appeal from Shipley. On trial. BALTIMORE COUNTY COURT-JUDGE PRICE. Court meets at Towsontown this morning. The This appearance docket is unusually large. COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. March No. Wash- 164. Smith Keech V8. the Baltimore and the CirCaleb Railroad Company. Appeal from for Prince George's county. cuit delivered the opinion of this No.22. Bartol ington Court ordered. Court. Justice Judgreversed and procedendo George T. Crawford no. Special Appeal from the Circuit for S. Justice Bartol Charles ment Blackburn. county. docket. delivered Court the Richard opinion of this Court. Judgment affirmed. COURT FTHE UNITED STATES. SUPREME MARCH 1, 1861.-1 154. Arnold Midet plaintiffs in error, V8. The FRIDAY, al., State further of Ohio. bury to dismiss this cause was arguStanton in support thereof, in opposition thereto. The Pugh ed by motion Mr. No. H. 92. and Bryan Win. by et Mr. al. C. Reddall, plaintiff in error, V8. Wm. further to dismiss this cause was arguMr. Attorney General Stanton and Mr. Tyson and Mr. 29. The United The ed thereof, by motion by Mayer in in support oppoV8. Frederick Billings et al. sition thereto. No. Stanton This States, cause ap- for Mr. Attorney and for the and by Mr. Reverdy United pellants, was Mr. the appellants, Vinton argued by appellees. General No. 29. Johnson The Apappellants, V8. Frederick Billingsetal. States States, from the District Court of the United decree peal the southern district of California. The affirmed. of for District Court in this cause 103. Watson Freeman, plaintiffs in error, V8. Jabez bv et States, the No. said &c., Marshal commenced C. Howe United The argument of this cause was al. Mr. Parker for the plaintiffin error. Adjourned until Monday, eleven o'clock.