First National Bank (New York, NY)

Episode Information

Episode UID
826801294
Episode Type
Run β†’ Suspension β†’ Reopening
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
82680 national
Charter Number
8268
Start Date
October 26, 1907
Location
New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
e4aa5906f811866c

Response Measures

Accommodated withdrawals, Clearinghouse loan, Partial suspension, Full suspension, Books examined

Clearinghouse involved: Yes (loan, examination, or other measures)

Description

Articles describe the 1907 New York banking panic and citywide suspension/resumption; the specific bank is not named.

Events (5)

1. June 16, 1906 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. October 26, 1907 Run
Cause
Macro News
Cause Details
Systemic financial panic of October 1907 led depositors to withdraw funds from New York banks
Measures
Banks invoked by-law clause demanding 30-to-90 days' notice for withdrawals; paid large depositors by check
Newspaper Excerpt
At those banks which had experienced runs the lines disappeared, although many filed written notices of their intention to withdraw their deposits
Source
newspapers
3. October 26, 1907 Suspension
Cause
Macro News
Cause Details
Citywide suspension of cash payments by New York banks during the 1907 panic; clearing house certificates and restricted payments followed
Newspaper Excerpt
All of the savings banks in New York today refused to pay depositors on demand. Under an agreement ... the banks took advantage of the clause in their by-laws which permits them to demand from thirty to ninety days' notice
Source
newspapers
4. December 26, 1907 Reopening
Newspaper Excerpt
BANK DEPOSITORS RECOVER FROM PANIC (New York. Dec. 26.-Today was the date of the expiration of most of the sixty-day withdrawal notices ... but scarcely a depositor called for his money and The New York banks have been announcing for some time that specie payments are about to be resumed.
Source
newspapers
5. June 23, 1926 Voluntary Liquidation
Source
historical_nic

Newspaper Articles (19)

Article from The Washington Times, October 26, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Many Send in Written Desires to Withdraw Deposits. Cortelyou Given Credit for Terminating the Money Flurry. NEW YORK, Oct. 26.-All of the savings banks in New York today refused to pay depositors on demand. Under an agreement reached at a meeting of their presidents yesterday, the banks took advantage of the clause in their by-laws which permits them to demand from thirty to ninety days' notice from depositors who wish to draw on their accounts. Notices were posted on all savings banks to this effect today, from the biggest, with deposits of almost $100,000,000, to the smallest, with deposits of only $17,000. The result was felt immediately. At those banks which had experienced runs the lines disappeared, although many filed written notices of their intention to withdraw their deposits at the expiration of the thirty, sixty, or ninety days, according to whichever period the bank adopted.


Article from The Madison Daily Leader, October 30, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

SCARE IS SUBSIDING Runs Upon New York Banks Practically Cease. STOCK MARKET UNSTEADY Calling in of Loans Causes a Decline in Prices, Canadian Pacific Leading in the Slump-Worldwide Scramble for Gold. New York, Oct. 30.-The financial situation is without notable developments. and the abating interest indicates that the public has pretty well gotten over its scare. The stock markets is a little unsteady, but without extreme agitation. The announcement at the ImpeS rial bank of Germany a raised its discount rate from 5 1/2 to 6 1/2 per cent in order to protect its gold holdings was not unexpected by bankers here. It is thought quite likely that the Bank of England will follow suit by raising its rate at the regular meeting on Thursday. The scramble for gold is such at all the financial centersLondon, Paris, Berlin and New York -that the metel will go to the highest bidder and under present conditions New York is likely to appear for a time in this role. Her ability to get gold is due not only to the need for it, but to the large credits which are being established by the movement of the crops and other products-notably wheat, cotton, copper, tobacco and meats-and by the sale of American securities. These influences are usually more potent than artificial measures to obtain the yellow metal. It is believed this will be effective to place sufficient gold at the command of the New York market and to maintain credit and cause the resumption of banking operations in the usual manner within a few days. Runs upon the banks here have practically ceased since the banks adopted the policy of paying large depositors in checks. Some transfers of accounts are being made from the smaller to the larger banks, which resulted in adverse balances against the former, but strengthening the ability of the larger institutions to meet pressure and to support the market.


Article from The Roswell Daily Record, December 3, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

"The current number of Harper's Weekly contains an editorial 'roast' of the clearing house certificates issued in Las Vegas, New Mexico. In view of the fact that the financial difficulties of the West were wholly due to the suspension of payment by the New York banks, and the issue by these banks of clearing house certificates and other forms of 'Johnsmith' currencyβ€”as it is now calledβ€”it would seem that the Weekly might have found a target for its ammunition nearer home.β€”Socorro Chieftain.


Article from Deseret Evening News, December 3, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# RESUMPTION. Horace Greely was wont to say that "the way to resume is to resume." The New York banks have been announcing for some time that specie payments are about to be resumed. It appears that the bankers elsewhere are ready to pay cash as soon as New York decides to keep its promises. It is noted as one peculiar feature of the present panic that some of the New York bankers will become rich because of it. And we doubt not that the most immediate cause of the suspension of cash payment by the banks all over the country was the stoppage of such payments by the banks in New York. As long as the banks of that city continue to withhold payment of their obligations, there seems to be no reason why they might not be purchasing the government bonds and so making a profit out of withholding cash payments to the rest of the country. Such a suggestion is made in many quarters, and the way to negative any such suspicion is for the New York banks to pay their obligations inland in the current money of the realm.


Article from Albuquerque Morning Journal, December 27, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANK DEPOSITORS RECOVER FROM PANIC (New York. Dec. 26.-Today was the date of the expiration of most of the sixty-day withdrawal notices re. quired by the savings banks at the height of the paniè in October, but searcely a depositor called for his money


Article from The Times Dispatch, February 7, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

City were increased on the security of stock and bond loans from $281,000,000 to $302,000,000. Three hundred and twelve millions loaned on collateral of Wall Street, and yet they suspended payments to their individual depositors and to their banking correspondents throughout the country. And they did it when they had money in their treasury with which to meet their obliga-tions." ### Kept Cash; Got Premium. Mr. Culberson declared that while New York had so much cash in its banks Southern banks were paying a premium for cash. The Aldrich bill, he declared, would give the banks more power and would foster stock and bond speculation by the banks and still further discriminate against the general public, and in the interest of the bondholding classes. "Against this policy," he added, "I want to enter my earnest and emphatic protest." Senator Hopkins replied briefly to Mr. Culberson. "Every statement made by the Senator," he said, "has been answered by the Secretary of the Treasury in his report." Mr. Culberson said the secretary refused to give the Texas banks deposits they asked for, and Mr. Hopkins replied that he had done the same thing in respect to Chicago banks, as he put the money where he believed the greatest emergency existed. The consideration of Mr. Culberson's resolution was postponed, and it was allowed to lie on the table.


Article from The Birmingham Age-Herald, March 12, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FINANCIAL BILL HOTLY DENOUNCED Senator Clarke of Arkansas Hits Several Fierce Blows ALDRICH ATTEMPTS REPLY Investigation of Causes of the Panic Is Demanded by Senator Clarke, Who Also Denounces New York Stock Exchange. Washington, March 11.-Senator Clarke of Arkansas denounced the pending currency bill in a speech in the Senate today, declaring that no currency legislation should be enacted until an investigation is held as to the causes of the panic. "No such legislation is necessary now, said Mr. Clarke. "It is not only not necesI sary, but it may become dangerous. am not disposed to tolerate the idea of giving any support to the committee bill, nor the substitute proposed by the minority members of the Senate." If emergency currency is to be provided, Mr. Clarke said, the benefits should be extended all persons whose legitimate business demands cause them to need it. Mr. Clarke denounced the operations of stock exchanges and said the American people would not be satisfied with the proposed currency legislation without a complete knowledge of causes of the panic. "The time has arrived," he said, "when the affairs of the New .York stock exchange and other stock exchanges must be looked into." Mr. Clarke's reference to the stoppage of the payments by the New York banks called Mr. Aldrich to his feet with the remark that he did not believe the people would permit that course again to be pursued. "I trust the senator from Rhode Island as a historian," retorted Mr. Clarke, "but I do not trust him as a prophet." Mr. Clarke expressed the opinion that the majority would not pass the bill allowing the emergency circulation to be retired without limitation. Mr. Clarke said he would not only require a restriction of reserves, but he would deny to a national bank the right to pay interest on checking accounts. Senator Nelson suggested that the national banks should pay interest on the $250,000,000 of government deposits. Mr. Aldrich said that five years ago he had introduced a bill providing for the payment of interest on such deposits at the rate of 1 1/2 per cent, but, he added, senators had opposed that bill on the ground that it changed the nature of the loan. Former Senator Spooner and the late Senator Morgan, he said, opposed the bill. If that objection could be overcome he declared his willingness to again bring in such a measure. He did not know any reason unless it should be a legal one, of the kind suggested, why interest should not be charged on these deposits. Mr. Culberson, he said, had introduced a bill to require payment of interest on government deposits and it was now before the committee on finance. Mr. Bailey spoke at some length suggesting that the main purpose of his substitute was to favor the principle of government money instead of bank money He explained that he had provided for a distribution of the emergency currency in accordance with population, although he realized that business necessity was a greater measure of the amount they should have. But it was not possible to make sure of the business needs of the several sections and it was a simple matter to ascertain the population. An extended argument was made by Mr. Newlands of Nevada in favor of his view that the sending of a check from one state to another makes the business of banking interstate commerce.


Article from The Washington Herald, April 26, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

James C. Hallock, of Brooklyn, whose father originated the clearing house in America, and who has himself studied the subject of clearing houses for many years, said yesterday in an interview with a representative of The Washington Herald: "Thirty-two thousand depositors in Brooklyn, probably 100,000 in Greater New York, had accounts in failed banks last winter. of the "Millions have citizens distrust throughout Wall Union come to street as a stewpot of panics, which boils over unexpectedly. The American people would rejoice to see Congress enact a law which would protect the country against financial disturbance from that quarter. Favors Legislative Action. a few men in New York scream as If were to killed. would "Possibly they be than But even in battle many more are killed think they are going to be. However, it is true, I wish our Representatives would rise as one man and render harmless some New York/ bankers, who could be crushed as easily as a spider. "Understand that the principal banks in the city belong to a union; yet they let one of their number suspend and deserted five, forcing four to fail, so that for months there have been closed banks on whose dusty windows the passing throng have been reading a shameless advertisement of desertion in the soiled letters, 'Member of the New York Clearing House. "Cannot even its members be trusted? Now, though these broken banks suffered losses which their shareholders have had to bear, every one of the six will resume or pay depositors in full. "Their funds would have far exceeded their liabilities to depositors. if a little time had been allowed them to realize on their assets. Banking in New York Safe. in New York is conducted more safely than suppose. much "Banking since people National Not the Marine Bank failed, in 1884, with a net loss to depositors of $765,800, has a dollar been lost by depositors of failed national banks in the city of New York. The only other net loss that ever occurred was $25,612 by the failure of the Croton National Bank, 1867; that is to say, less than $800,000 years of of less than a year, in in an forty-five average national $18,000 banking, with no net loss at all for the past twenty-four years. "St. Louis has had only one net loss from the failure of a national bank, $38.428, in 1887, an annual average of less than $860. with no net loss at all for over twenty years. Chicago has had four small aggregating $462,453 since 1675. for of only $14,000 thirty-three years, no net net an the average losses, past annually with loss since 1893. "In short, the national banks of New York are so absolutely safe that they could guarantee each other's deposits without practically any risk. When the occurred on the Mercantile National runs Bank, First National Bank of Brooklyn, National Bank of North America, and New Amsterdam National Bank, all the other national banks in the city receive could without peril have offered to checks on them for deposit. What Existing Lew Requires, "National banks are required by law at par any and all notes or by other national to bills to receive issued banks. power Conunder its constitutional gress, promote the general welfare, should also compel the national banks of New York to accept checks on any of their number. "There can be no question that it would promote the general welfare. History shows that in this country no great panic anywhere but in New York, could not be one if at has and there started bank all there times checks on every national were accepted by all. "Bank notes are always received, bank that issued them may So, in New York, na- on banks should be though the national have though failed. the received bank checks drawn by on or bad, open or banks have lost nothing the tional were tional good banks, notes. closed. by And receiv- Nspar national bank would lose New on receiving national ing nothing at in banks the end of by York checks under other national banks in the city, all circumstances. Bank Assassinations. "Investigation would show that more New of the closed banks in banks than one assassinated by other York were The offense of bank assassination dethere. in its nature. To protect is criminal against the effects of bank of as- repositors the criminal character national sassination, accept checks on other recognized banks fusals' of to New York, should be the law of the land. New in refuse checks drawn temporarily on a "To bank. which, though meet York has sufficient funds to is a them by mischief embarrassed, any process of liquidation, which, if it form of malicious the bank, may annoy results in closing thousands of citizens, credi- with and their injure wives, children, parents, and of tors. "In New York thy it brother?" is the old And story he anCain. 'Where know is not. Am my What brother's hast swered: 'I the Lord said, keeper?' Then voice of thy brother's from the blood thou done? crieth to The me earth. York, Concern in New Mutual New York banks assert the since right "The their brother's keeper. following Ever the to be 1884, in the month the June 4. Marine National Bank, emfailure committee has for clearing of house the considered been it whenever it examine the interest of the powered, of the association, to and the any bank member from any member association, securities as to require amount and character for the committee might resulting the of protection such exchanges an of the of balances deem clearing sufficient house. bank from or the every non-member member same institution "Since 1890 submit clearing to through the members a examinahas had to of are as required tions


Article from The Marion Daily Mirror, November 24, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Charged with Taking Change. New York, Nov. 24.-John G. Jen. kins, jr., formerly president of the Jenkins Trust Co. of Brooklyn, which failed during the financial panic of 1907, was put on trial in Brooklyn Monday charged with the larceny of $50,000. It is alleged that while president of the trust company he misappropriated $50,000 of its funds by transferring it to the firm of Frank & J. G. Jenkins, jr., of which he was a member. Jenkins is a member of a family of bankers widely known before the financial crash of last year. His father was president of the First National bank of Brooklyn, which went into the hands of a receiver during the panic.


Article from The Bemidji Daily Pioneer, November 24, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Jenkins is a member of a family of bankers who were well and widely known before the financial crash of last year. His father, who was president of the First National bank of Brooklyn, which went into the hands of a receiver during the panic, died subsequent to that event.


Article from New-York Tribune, September 9, 1909

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FAVORS CENTRAL BANK Mr. Vreeland's Remedy for Defects in Currency System. Bedford Springs, Penn., Sept. -The feature of to-day's session of the State Bankers' Association of Pennsylvania Convention was an address by Representative Edward B. Vreeland, of New York, chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee of the House. He said, in part: Panics are merely the culmination of long continued disease. The defects in our system are such that a period of great prosperity and expansion almost certainly results in panic. So much so that many of our people accept a panic as inevitable once every ten or fifteen years. But we have the example of the other great commercial countries to show that periods of prosperity and expansion do not necessarily result in money panies. They may be avoided by better banking and currency methods. The greatest defect in our currency system is its lack of response to. the needs of business. We need this element of elasticity in our volume of money more than any other great nation. There are those who think that the trouble during the panic of 1907 and preceding panics might have been averted if the banks were compelied to keep their cash reserves in their own vaults. This would be true to the extent that the bankers of the country would not then become frightened, and all attempt at the time to withdraw their balances from New York in cash. This is what forced the suspension of cash payment by the New York banks in 1907. But the thought of those who advocate this change is that banks with the full cash reserve in their vaults would be fortifled against panic. This is not to any considerable extent true. We need greater further centralization rather than a further scattering of reserves. We need rather a centralization of reserves so that a bank. If solvent, with good assets. could obtain all the money needed to pay off its depositors. Of course, centralization of reserves would only be possible if the banks knew that, beyond question, their money could be obtained, if needed, as the banks of England, France and Germany know that their reserves. and any amount needed in addition, can be obtained of the central bank. I am opposed to the branch bank system. The branch bank system will drive any other system with which it competes out of existence. The establishment of the branch bank system in the United States would, in time, mean the extermination of the small independent bank. It seems to me that one hundred years of experience covering a very wide field point irresistibly toward the centralization of banknote issue and of bank reserve. It seems to me that if we have safety and stability and still have flexibility in our system, it must be in the hands of some form of central authority and with some measure of government control. I would have a distinctively American institution. I would have an institution which would round out and complete our banking system, which would be the keynote of the arch and not one which would enter the field as the rival and competitor of the banks which we have. I would have its dividends limited to a small amount, `say 4 per cent, and the remainder of its earnings go into the national Treasury for the security of its note circulation, the paying off of the greenbacks or similar purposes for the general good. The result would be that its management would direct its policy in relation to note circulation, reserves and rates of interest, for the general welfare and not with the hope of making increased profits for the bank.


Article from Rock Island Argus, October 19, 1909

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

CENTRAL BANK EXPERIMENT ONCE WRECKED THE NATION'S CREDIT 100 New York firms went to the wall distant place to earn dividends for the BY TAV. stockholders. in one month. Every bank in the city (Special Correspondence of The Argus.) suspended. Congress was forced to The year 1791 marked the first bank Washington, Oct. 16.-That the of the United States. In that year pass an act forbidding the PennsylvaUnited States has had two unsuccessnia bank of the United States from congress chartered a bank for 20 years. ful experiences at running banks, and Its methods brought about, 18 years using the notes of the United States should therefore act slowly in considbank. Then the New York banks relater, the first bank panic in this counering Wall street's central government try. Bribery and corruption in politisumed business. But the reckless opcal affairs were the dominant features erations of the financiers who owned bank idea, will be urged by the small bankers of the country, who are anof the government's first experience in the United States bank brought on distagonistic to the program Senator Aldbanking. aster. Oct. 19, 1839, it failed, carrying In 1817 a second United States bank to ruin 343 of the 850 banks in the rich has promised to promote in a came into existence. Within a short series of speeches in the west upon union and causing 62 to suspend for a time it had 18 branches. In Novemhis return from Europe. time. Its debt to the Bank of England Attention will also be directed to the ber, 1818, it was insolvent. Forty conalone was $23,000,000, and the failure, fact that the greatest obstacle in Cangressmen who held stock in the insticoupled with the consequent repudiaada's struggle to develop has been her tion of indebtedness by several states, tution, however, enabled it to continue antiquated system of big central banks in business. For the following five destroyed American credit abroad. with branches in every country town, years there was keen financial disIn spite of the assurance given in inthrough which all surplus deposits are tress throughout the country. spired articles sent out from Washcentralized in the large cities. Vetoed Renewal of Charter. ington, that politics will play no part Pinches Small Banker. In 1823 President Jackson vetoed a in a central government bank, the The Canadian merchant or manufacrenewal of the bank's charter, the small bankers are apprehensive lest turer in the outlying town has been the contrary prevail. They can hardly bank retaliating with coercive measunable to secure bank accommodations ures. It contracted the money market conceive that it would be in keeping needed in his business, while idle and caused great distress. Other banks with the game of politics for any parmoney from his own town, which a losprang up. The United States bank ty to set up an institution such as a cally owned bank would gladly have continued operations under a charter government bank without manning it loaned him, has been sent to the head obtained by bribery from the state of with politicians, as only by taking adoffices of the big city bank with a local Pennsylvania, reissuing all its old vantage of such opportunities are great branch, perhaps to be invested in a far notes. The crash came in 1837, when political machines built up.


Article from The Roswell Daily Record, November 29, 1909

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

U. S. BANK A FAILURE Washington, Nov. 29.-That the United States has had two unsuccessful experiences at running banks, and should, therefore, act slowly in considering Wall Street's central government bank idea, is being urged by the small bankers of the country, who are avowedly antagonistic to the program of Senator Aldrich. The country bankers are directing attention to the fact that the greatest obstacle in Canada's struggle to develop has been her antiquated systerm of big central banks with branches in every country town, through which all surplus deposits are centralized in the large citires. The Canadian merchant or manufacturer in the outlying town has been unable to secure bank accomodations needed in his business, while idle money from his own town, which a locally owned bank would gladly have loaned him, has been sent to the head offices of the big city bank with a local branch, perhaps to be invested in a far distant place to earn dividends for the stockholders. The year 1791 marked the first bank of the United States. In that year Congress chartered a bank for 20 years. Its methods brought about, 18 years later, the first bank panic in this country. Bribery and corruption in political affairs were the domi nant features of the government's first experience in banking. In 1817 a second United States bank came into existence. Within a short time it had 18 branches. In No. vember, 1818, it was insolvent. Forty Congressmen who held stock in the institution, however, enabled it to continue business. For the following five years there was keen financial distress throughout the country. In 1832 President Jackson vetoed a renewal of the bank's charter, the bank retaliating with coercive measures. I: contracted the money markets and caused great distress. Other banks sprung up. The United States bank continued operations under a charter obtained by bribery from the state of Pennsylvania, reissuing all of its old notes. The crash came in 1837, when 100 New York firms went to the wall in one month. Every bank in the city suspended. Congress was forced to pass an act forbidding the Pennsylvania Bank of the United States from using the notes of the old United States bank. Then the New York banks resumed business. But the reckless operations of the financiers who owned the United States bank brought on disaster. Oct. 19, 1839. it failed, carrying to ruin 343 of the 850 banks in the Union and causing sixty-two to suspend for a time. Its debt to the bank of England alone was $23,000,000, and the failure, coupled with the consequent ren pudiation of indebtedness by several states, destroyed American credit abroad. In spite of the assurance given by Senator Aldrich in his speeches in the west, that politics will play no 1 part in a central government bank, the small bankers are apprehensive [ lest the contrary prevail. They can hardly conceive that it would be in I keeping with the game of politics for any party to set up an institution such as a great government bank without manning it with politicians, as only by taking advantage of such opportunities are great political machines built up. :


Article from Tulsa Daily World, November 16, 1911

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# NECESSITY FOR CURRENCY REFORM. The National Citizens' league for the promotion of a sound banking system in the United States is receiving support and encouragement from every section in the country. It is purely a non-partisan organization and is approaching the subject of currency legislation from a business and not a political point of view. The indications are constantly growing brighter for the successful solution of this problem of national finances upon a basis that will make panics and consequent disasters a thing of the past. In discussing this subject the Saturday Evening Post relates the circumstances which Germany was recently called upon to face and asks the pertinent question, "What would have happenned here?" Upon this point the Post says: "They might have had a panic in Berlin this fall. There had been speculation and overtrading. Credit was under a severe strain. Some eighty million dollars of treasury notes were maturing. The war-clouded political horizon caused France to draw in her money, and the amount of Parsian funds lying at call in Berlin was estimated at 200 million dollars. In some parts of the empire signs of uneasiness among bank depositors appeared. The failure of the Bank of Egypt did not help matters. "The gravity of the situation appears from the fact that in a single week the Imperial Bank lost thirty-nine million dollars of its cash reserve. This is a rather larger loss of cash reserve than the New York associated banks suffered in October, 1907, when they resorted to clearing house loan certificates and restricted cash payments-leading to a wholesale dislocation of the country's banking system. There was no restriction of cash payments at Berlin, however. On the contrary, in six business days the Imperial bank increased its loans and discounts by 145 million dollars, and in order to do so increased its note issue by 154 million dollars. "Thus, notwithstanding the severe strain and the large loss of cash. October settlements were met without a hitch and Berlin paid back to Paris a 150 million dollars of call loans. Ten days later the discount rate at Berlin had fallen to 4 per cent. "All of which shows how a great central bank can deal with a crisis. What would have happened here under like conditions? Perhaps another suspension of cash payments; another breakdown of the banking system; another six or eight months of business doldrums-because we haven't the apparatus to meet a crisis. We know we are rather more liable to fiscal conflagrations than any other great nation; but we rely upon nothing but a volunteer bucket brigade to put them out."


Article from The Evening World, July 6, 1912

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

EXTENT OF SUPERVISION OF THE BANKS. Some facts first as to the extent of the supervision of our banking institutions: There are 21,274 State and 7,277 national banks under constant fire of the State and national financial sharpshooters. Seven States, Arizona, Mississippi, New Mexico, Tennessee, Kentucky, Utah and Arkansas, with 4,159 State banks, are as yet outside the breastworks of proper supervision, but the financial institutions of the other forty-one States as well as the national banks in the forty-eight States, are under the constant eye of the 600 bank examiners. If the public imagines that there is going to be a suspension of supervision of banks next Monday and Tuesday it will be disappointed. Less than 20 per cent. of the bank examiners of the country will be able to attend the convention and participate in the discussion of the plan and the working out of the details of the new organization. The other 80 per cent. will be busy all over the country checking up officials of banks and weeding out the dishonest ones. Just who will be able to come and who cannot absent themselves from work will not be definitely known until National Bank Examiner Frank L. Norris of Philadelphia calls the roll next week. Mr. Norris has the hearty COoperation of Supt. George C. Van Tuyl Jr. of the New York State Banking Department, who, assisted by National 1 Bank Examiner Edward F. Roreback of this city, arranged for the meeting. One of the most interesting of the National Bank examiners is J. W. Schofield of Washington, who closed and then reopened the First National Bank of Brooklyn. following Its difficulties in the panic of 1907. Schofield is about sixty years old, and an expert banking authority. When a boy he was an Indian trader on the Santa Fe, and once when he and his partner were taking a wagon of bacon through the Arizona desert. a riffe bullet pierced his hat. He rode on without flinching. his coolness quite disconcerting his hidden assallant. and it goes without saying the foodstuffs in his charge were delivered at their destination. This will illustrate the kind of metal Schofield is made from.


Article from New-York Tribune, December 9, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# Senator Weeks Enters Lists. Senator O'Gorman said that the New York banks had lent to the country banks more than $410,000,000. Mr. Swanson insisted that the condition was exactly the reverse. Senator Weeks then called attention to the law which required that the New York banks keep 25 per cent of their reserves in their vaults, asserting that they had fallen below this limit when they suspended payments. Senator Root then took a hand in the discussion and elicited from Senator Swanson the admission that the country banks deposited their money with New York reserve agents with the understanding that it was to be loaned on call. "They knew," he said, "when the money was loaned that if there came a sudden demand from all parts of the country they would be subject to the difficulties and embarrassments arising from a defective system." For this reason, Senator Root intimated, there was no occasion whatever to blame the New York bankers for lending the money as they did. Senator O'Gorman quoted from the testimony given by country bankers before the Banking and Currency Committee to show that they had received more aid


Article from The Washington Times, December 9, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Currency Bill Speeches Soon To Be Concluded Early conclusion of the set speeches on the currency bill is expected in the Senate and the bill will then be considered paragraph by paragraph. Much informal discussion will arise in that connection, but nothing has developed to indicate the bill will not be passed before Christmas. The feature of the debate yesterday was the attack by Senator Swanson on the banks of New York for their suspension of payments of the money they held belonging to other banks in the 1907 panic. This was resented by Senator O'Gorman in strong language. Senators Root and Weeks also defended the New York banks. Senators Nelson and Weeks, in addition to Senator Swanson, were the chief speakers in the course of the session yesterday afternoon and last night.


Article from Evening Star, August 7, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

be prevented, or, at least, its effects minimized can by the proper organization sysand control of a country's banking tem. No such premium upon money or taken such collapse of credit has of in of the leading that the last 100 years as Noplace general Europe during any States countries in in the United in December of 1907, war and social witnessed vember periods and of condition revolution. except of similar disastrous for a and credits in England one must Namoney back to the time of the wars of go while in Germany no such foun- ocpoleon, has taken place since the shown currence of the empire. France has the dation such a banking condition but once that in was several generations, and last defeat at the hands of Prussia, war after her payment of her billion-dollar troubles. indemity the and bitter internal There have been suspensions of banks and great failures of business and banking houses in Failures Abroad Not these countries just the same as as Heavy as Here. in the United States, yet these disasters have not (as so offen has been the case here) been alIowed to paralyze the credit of the country. In Great Britain, the powerful firm of Overend Gurney failed in 1866, the Bank of Glasgow in 1878 and the house of Baring Bros. in 1890. Yet, on each occasion, the trouble was confined and no national financial convulsion followed. In France the same ability to avert financial panic was shown upon the failof such great banking institutions as ure the Union Generale in 1882 and the Comptoir d' Escompte in 1899; while in Germany the failure of the famous Leipziger Bank in 1901 is another example. in the United States, the suspension of Yet, payments by the New York banks has been followed by distress from Maine to California. Although banking reform had been demanded for a number of years, it took the panic of 1907 to insure a thorough prosecution of the task. Minor changes in our banking laws had been made from time to time, but the great prosperity of the country caused Congress to shrink from the responsibility of undertaking extensive reconstruction of the laws to under any which business had attained such mighty proportions. * * In 1000 Congress pased a currency act for the better support of the greenbacks, the Treasury notes of 1890 Better Support of and the silver Greenbacks by Law. dollars. After the panic of 1007 the Aldrich-Vreeland act was promulgated, which provided that the national banks might organize themselves into national currency assoclations, and that a member bank, with outstanding note circulation secured by States bonds equal to 40 per cent of might extend its United its capital, note issues upon other classes of securities until the total was equal to the sum of its capital and surplus. This act was intended only to be an emergency measure, and was enacted to expire by limitation June 30, 1914. The provision for increasing their note issue up to the present has not been taken advantage of by the banks The act has been extended to June 30. 1915. Further, following the panic, the national monetary commission was established, for the purpose of investigating means for improving credit arrangements in this country. Members of this commission visited England, France and Germany, and made thorough studies of the banking systems in vogue in these coun- of tries. The banking arrangements Canada, Scotland, Belgium, Sweden. Switzerland, Italy, Russia, Mexico and Japan were also investigated. The findings of the commission were published in reforty volumes, which form a good view of the world's banking business. Out of these studies grew proposals for the establishment of a National Reserve Association, a representative association the banks, the units of which were of to all be the clearing house associations which the banks of each city now mainThe democratic Congress rejected this tain. plan in favor of the federal reserve whose provisions, wisely enforced. act, will probably be found better suited to needs of the country than would have been the any one among the numberless plans which have been proposed.


Article from The Oklahoma Banker, September 1, 1931

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

A GOOD WAY TO HANDLE THE PROPOSITION When the First National Bank of Brooklyn failed in 1907, owing its depositors $1,200,000, Robert Jenkins, son of the president and 26 years of age, said he would pay off every depositor if they would give him time. Nobody took him seriously, but they gave him plenty of time as there was nothing else to do. Report has come to us today on good authority that the has paid off the last depositor. The family name has been son vindicated. The boy's cherished ambition realized and we find another man who believes that a banker is not only the dian of the people's money, but in accepting the deposit custo- assumes a sacred trust.