797. Valley Bank (Fresno, CA)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Run → Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
January 1, 1924*
Location
Fresno, California (36.748, -119.772)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
28c0093c

Response Measures

Accommodated withdrawals, Borrowed from banks or large institutions, Capital injected, Full suspension, Books examined

Other: Bank was sold/taken over by Bank of Italy and Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank following state-superintendent intervention.

Description

Articles describe incipient/actual runs with large withdrawals in Jan–Feb 1924, state superintendent intervened and arranged sale/assumption of the Valley Bank to the Bank of Italy and Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings (about March 1, 1924). The bank was insolvent (large bad/doubtful paper) and effectively ceased independent operations after the sale. I classify this as a run leading to suspension/closure (permanent takeover). Dates are taken from the narrative (Feb 23, 1924 heavy withdrawals; sale/assumption March 1924).

Events (5)

1. January 1, 1924* Other
Newspaper Excerpt
examination in January 1924 revealed the institution was insolvent; chief examiner reported condition much worse than had been disclosed; directors sworn to secrecy and told to correct bad paper or bank would be closed by the State superintendent of banks; capital impaired was reported earlier in January 1924 reports in press pieces (January 1924).
Source
newspapers
2. February 5, 1924 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
employment of J. E. Fickett as executive vice president/manager to try to stop the run and reorganize the bank; he found much larger losses and was unable to execute his plans because funds were used to pay depositors.
Source
newspapers
3. February 23, 1924 Run
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Discovery (and publicity) of large amounts of bad and doubtful paper and impaired capital triggered heavy withdrawals; examiners found large losses and insolvency.
Measures
State superintendent and other banks arranged emergency support; Crocker, Bank of Italy and Pacific-Southwest provided secured credit; J. E. Fickett was employed as manager to stem withdrawals and restructure; attempts made to raise funds, levy assessments, or find purchasers (Bank of Italy and Pacific-Southwest eventually purchased).
Newspaper Excerpt
on February 23 ... $112,000 in commercial deposits and $41,000 savings deposits had been withdrawn during the two hours the bank was open
Source
newspapers
4. March 1, 1924 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
State superintendent of banks, finding capital impaired and insolvency, arranged and supervised sale/transfer of the bank's assets and business to other banks to avoid a chaotic closing; bank ceased independent operations under state-directed sale.
Newspaper Excerpt
sale of the Valley bank to the Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings bank and the Bank of Italy ... sale was made in consideration of the assumption by the purchasing bank of all liabilities of the selling bank (on or about March 1, 1924)
Source
newspapers
5. * Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Examination by Bank of Italy auditor and state examiners found roughly $3,000,000 in bad and doubtful paper; Valley Bank was totally insolvent at the time of sale.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (9)

Article from The Los Angeles Times, May 20, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

JOHNSON TELLS OF BIG MERGER State Bank Head Reveals Valley Bank Deal Los Angeles Banks Finance Fresno Institution Directors Take Only Course Practicable (BY NIGHT WIRE] SAN FRANCISCO. May John Franklin Johnson State Su in perintendent of Banks, who days ago declined to give his down position in the suit brought by around stockholders of the Valley Bank of Fresno against the Bank Italy and the worth Trust and Savings Bank, growing thrown out of the merger of the bank the latter Institutions, because he had been subpoenaed as an individual instead of his official position under the amended stipulation ern Johnson's deposition outlined the Valley Bank situation in part as The Valley Bank examination of be in bad the its was ordered not paid, and its and were ordered to pear for conference CAPITAL IMPAIRED "It (Quoted was found that the Valley Bank owed Liberty the surplus and undivided profits been wiped out and even its capital had been President hell of the Valley Bank asked for time in 10% get his bank shape This granted but early in Janucondition Anton the Valley Bank became known the public and funds began be withdrawn from the institution through incipient runs. bank was offered for to number of financial tions, including the tional Bank, Bank of Italy the Hellman terests of Los Angeles the fornia Bank the American and now United Bank and Trust Company but the of the institution Dodge declined in all cases PROTECT BANK The Crocker bank perturbed over the arranged Fresident Mitchell from office and for James Flcket take charge of the bank to serve its assets, and following meeting between the Crocker Bank the Bank of Italy the Pacific each placed behind the Valley Bank as cured in order to protect situation in Central 'About this time the governor of Federal Twelfth District notified the superint that the Valley Bank had exhausted its rediscount abilities with the Federal Reserve and that the Federal Reserve no longer aid in keeping the ley Bank in operation. The State called meeting of the of the Valley Bank of Fresno notified them that under the he had only two courses to pur sue First To levy an assessment against the stockholders, to place the capital This, directors of the Valley Bank refused to do. Second To close the bank third alternative not within the authority of the State to mand would be for Bank to some which would its ities and the depositors OFFER TO BUY Offer to do this was made by the of Italy and the Bank of Angeles through Glannini and Charles F Stern respectively, at the ent request of the superintendent "Stern and Glannini, however made additional offer to support of the Valley Bank if the financially of that bank would carry the loan, and This the Valley Bank directors also refused to As the failure of the Valley Bank would carry number of small banks with throughout necessary that the support of the Bank Italy and the be given to the Valley Bank once the latter could then The of the Bank course ticable and made the sale which ratified by the thirds of the the hasing banks stating that the Valley Bank could refinance find would be glad of the picture The present suit is brought by one of stockholders of the Valley Bank had been kept in ignorance the true conditions of the tution by officers


Article from Visalia Times-Delta, May 23, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANKERS FRESNO DEAL TO BE Fresno Prosecutor Making Study Of Case ILLEGAL ACT CHARGED Valley Institution Hearing Develops New Angle FRESNO, uncovered in the examination of John Johnson, state superintendent banks, purporting to show illegal acts on the part of officers of the Valley Bank of Fresno, will be laid before District Attorney George R. Lovejoy Fresno county consideration. This was developed yesterday during examination of Johnson in San Fran cisco in connection with the suit charging collusion in the sale of the bank the Pacific-Southwest Trust and Savings bank and the Bank of Italy Johnson's examination was being continued today after which Giannini, former president the Bank of Italy was to be placed on the stand. Files of the state banking depart nient correspondence covering the case were admitted to the record yes. terday. These files showed that more than 1,300,000 was withdrawn by in cipient runs upon the Valley Bank preceding the employment of Fickett, who succeeded W. D. Mitchell president of the Fresno institution. According to the state banking partment's correspondence when $700,000 of additional money had been after Fickett's employment, the Valley Bank could no longer stand the strain put upon it. Stockholders Lose $900,000 The present suit was instituted by the Valley Bank who attempted to show collusion between the state banking the Bank of Italy and the PacificSouthwest Bank and thus obtain damages for loss in the value of their Valley Bank stock. It is claimed that proximately $900,000 was lost in the deal. Accusations that attorneys for the plaintiffs had used the mails to black mail Johnson and threats that federal prosecution of the attorneys would sought yesterday enlivened the hear ings.


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, July 17, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANK INQUIRY ENDS ROW Attorney Brings Quiz To Abrupt Halt (Continued From Page 7) ment reduced $24,000, while savings department loans were increased $5,000. it was shown. The reduction in bonds was $55,000; in reserves at the Federal Reserve bank, $90,000, and in the balance due from other banks, $32,000. Bills payable increased by $114,000. RUN STARTED ON BANK The balance sheets also showed that on February 23 in actual cash at the head office. eliminating cash items, there was $132,000, while by March this had been reduced to $64,000. This amount it is held was not enough carry on the business of the Valley bank for two hours the following Monday morning. in view of the fact that $112,000 in commercial deposits and $41,000 savings deposits had been withdrawn during the two hours the bank was open for business Satur- Dozen day. Among those who had been subpenaed to appear and make dep ositions here and who have been released by the decision of the plaintiff's attorney not to take any further depositions are A. M Hays and E. Walrond. vice of the Bank of Italy. and W. D. Feed Wheat, Mitchell, former president of the cwt. Valley bank Attorneys representing the variRed Milo, ous parties to the suit who have been here for the taking of the depcwt. ositions, which began with the questioning of W Sutherland vice president of the Pacific west managing director of the Fidelity branch Fresno, are as follows: McKay Jr., Los Anyeles, and W. M. Conley, Fresno, for the Pacific-Southwest: Louis Ferrarri and J. E Cook, both of San Francisco, for the Bank Italy: E. W. Davis, San Francisco, for the state banking department: and C. M. Booth and D. Dudley, both of San Francisco, for the plaintiffs


Article from The San Francisco Examiner, July 25, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

NEW CHARGES MARK VALLEY BANK BATTLE Accusations Are Made Against State in Plea for Continuance of Case An affidavit for continuance of the Valley Bank Fresno containing charges against John Franklin Johnson, State superintendent of banks, filed yesterday in the Superior Court Clarence M. Booth, attorney for the stockholders of the bank. At the same time complaint in intervention giving the names fifteen plaintiffs was filed by Booth. The original complaint was brought Maude Jane Loller the Bank of the Pacific Bank Los AngeJohn Franklin Johnson, Charles Stearn, James M. Oliver and W. Sutherland. The affidavit asks that the case, which now for August 3, before Judge Louis Ward, be continued for six weeks two months allow the plaintiff opportunity secure and to depositions of now outside California, Marco Hellman, president of the Merchants National Bank of Los Angeles, and Graves, formerly president of the Valley Bank, are named witnesses who are not now in CaliforThe complaints state in the affidavit that they hope show through Maroo Hellman that Johnmade statements talks Hellman and in depositions taken later. It alleged in the affidavit that on February 1924, Johnson told Hellman that the Valley Bank had been sold, that there was run on the bank that he would not permit resale of the Institution to second independent bank. further stated in the that the plaintiffs, through the inof as witness, show that he told by the State bank examiner, when president, that the financial condition of the bank not serious and that amount bad "paper" which held was not excessive. is contended that in his depositions declared that the examiner told him that the institution was in serious straits and was dangerously insolvent.


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, November 26, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank History The publication of State Superintendent of Banks Johnson's narration of the management and sale of the Valley bank of Fresno, involves two main considerations of public interest. The one statement of the steps leading up to the sale of this bank, under the of the state auspices department of banks, to the Pacific Southwest and to the Bank of Italy. The other is judgment of the business practices within the Valley bank which led up to the situation which the state superintendent of banks felt called for the sale, in his words, in order to prevent his closing the bank causing probably widespread financial upheaval throughout central California. This sale of the Valley bank took place more than year and half ago. Since the acts of alleged financial misconduct were gone into in report to the bank superintendent in December, 1923, nearly two years ago, and since the situation was critically examined at the time very of the sale, consummated on March 1924, may be fairly assumed that the question of the alleged criminal conduct of the officers of the Valley bank was long ago given mature consideration, and that delay in filing formal charges has been intentional. It reported that the matters in dispute are to be brought before grand jury. Be that as it the of time may, length that has elapsed and the tone of the report of the state bank superintendent show that his report intended to explain to the public the validity of the steps that he then took, as well as to make more plain the conduct of the officers of the former bank. There has been great amount of discussion of the allegedly autocratic character of the action of the state and of the possible benefit from it derived the banks by two that took over the of the endangered institution. Mr. Johnson makes his report in defense of his conduct, and incidentally meets many angles of criticism that have been offered to his procedure. That the period in which the reported run on the Valley bank was at its height was one great danger to the financial staliity of this valley, cannot be questioned. Any public spirited help to save the Raisin Belt should be appreciated. It was to this institution that the state bank superintendent declares that his efforts were rected. On the other hand, defenders of the former bank declare that the Valley bank merely shared in the difficulties of all institutions in California at that time, and that it might have been saved, without being bodily handed over to two of its rivals, had not the state bank superintendent intervened. In order that position taken by the state bank superintendent may be definitely known, story of the Valley bank settlement will be printed in full, in installments in The Republican, daily until completed.


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, November 27, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

SESSIONS BANK TOLD DEALS IN HUSH DIRECTORS OF TANGLED Superintendent Exposes Secret Meetings Of Valley Bank Board With Him In order that the people of central fully advised of the alleged Valley bank moindle, The will pubHsh the complete report of the state of banks to Friend W. Richardson. This report will be published in daily until completed. -Editor's note. That extremely serious situaand one that demanded the faced the Valley bank January, 1924, vealed in the John Franklin state superintendent of banks, to Governor Richardson, which been made and being published in full by installments. Johnson's report to the governor would fill approximately 55 newspaper columns. It sets forth chronological order the history the Valley bank, from its formation to its condition when merged wtih the Pacific Southwest Trust Savings bank and the Bank of Italy. SWEARS SECRECY On January 1924, Johnson met with the board of directors of the Valley bank and explained the members the gravity of the situaation, and them to the true of matters from the public He thus that might have hundreds people throughout central California to lose everything they owned. At meeting, the report shows, the management of the bank presented plan of which included promise strict compliance with the law, reduction salaries, and the immediate liquidation or removal of bad paper soon losses were determined and means provided for the removal. The report continues as follows: INSTALLMENT II "On January 1924, the president and entire of of the Valley bank, Field met with the superintendent of banks, his attorney, his chief his chief deputy. and Examiner Barth the office of the superintendent of banks. superintendent explained the board the gravity of the situation confronting them and their bank, and the board sworn not discuss the matters discussed this meeting with anyone outside the membership the board. This was for the purpose of preventing the of the bank being spread by of the board, the being that the of the bank was such to justify the utmost and refraining from any outside discussion of the bank's affairs with anyone whatsoever. Chief Examiner Wingate then proceeded to read the examination letter which had been prepared. As he proceeded with the reading of the letter, both myself and my attorney inquired the directors if they understood they had known of the various criticized in the letter, and elicited the that most of them not with had been on in the Valley bank Every effort was made to give the complete statement the point of view the department and they were emphatically informed regarding their duty in the premises management which would conduct the bank economically and efficiently, within the limitations the law and sound banking and that was their duty review all loans then in the bank inform themselves as their worth and endeavor determine upon practical program for dealing with impairment might by sequent by and half of the directors. The board directors promised to attempt correct the of the bank and to for cutting the bank and report adjustments regularly. Mr. Mitchell asked that 30 days time given him which correct the of the bank. told him that knew no improvement the condition be had in 30 days and said could that was willing to give longer time if the board directors would take proper steps correct and would correct the within the bank. At this meeting the directors stated assessment could levied. THE LETTER On Monday, January 1924, the first page of the originally was incorporate the record of the fact of the holding the ing in the office the superintendof banks, but the letter was not otherwise materially altered. above in statement by Chief Examiner Wingate on file in the state banking department, copy of which hereto attached, made part hereof and marked exhibit On January 1924, as superintendent banks,I wrote letter the Federal Reserve bank regarding the affairs of the Valley bank. this letter stated that the condition revealed by the examination such that necessary have complete the and board of rectors; that January of directors had met my office and the disclosed by the reviewed with board for their information: and that the ment had gram of adjustment three spects, first, strict with the law future reduction salaries, third, the immediate removal from the bank of illegal per and of bad paper fast as losses were determined and means provided for its removal. further stated that the management given further time, no specific limit being set, promise to proceed actively and effectively on the above program, being my understanding with the of directors. further stated that matter policy seemed inadvisable that time to fix an impairment and levy an because of the conditions prevailing the San Joaquin valley, but that the affairs of the institution would followed and definite program of improvement insisted upon. This more fully appears from letter itself, copy which hereto attached, made part hereof and marked exhibit January started to Washington with my attorney who joined me Sacramento January 1924, the Valley bank situation being left in the hands the chief deputy and chief examdid not return from my trip Washington until February 1924. "On January 1924, the examina- tion letter was signed by the chief deputy mailed the Valley bank. This letter the extent that went, and upon the information then in the hands of our examiners, contained true the condition and affairs of the bank. stated the actual condition of the Valley bank was much worse than that time than out in said the bank being fact insolvent, and many officers and directors being guilty of illegal and and practices, will hereinafter shown, and which made their and impossible. copy of the letter more fully showing these facts is hereto attached, made part hereof and marked exhibit Receipt the examinaletter and the fact that they had familiarized themselves with its contents acknowledged by the directors writing, that cepting only This appears from the receipt and copy of which is hereto attached. made part and marked exhibit "On January 12, 1924, Directors Hopper, Graves Pierce called the banking and saw Chief Examiner Wingate and directors advised that Mitchell had recently been president of the Valley bank the annual meeting of the stockholders with the understanding that was proceed as rapidly possible up various matters, loans which was and was then to hold office at the pleasure the board of directors. was the and individual opinion of each of these directors Mitchell had demonstrated his unfitness for the presidency the bank. These were advised ascertain the facts, and were advised that was their duty times to keep all the of the bank. They so doing the future, although that the had been careless in this regard and had permitted to be put off by the officers when information. The directors were told that after the matter bad paper had been definitely determined by the board with the banking department, definite program adjustment must be adopted. They were assured that the departwould be disposed prevent any the reputa of the bank by levying an sessment such course were legally possible. No were given regard. The fully appears from Chief Wingate, which is hereto exhibit and made January Cashier Crowell Valley bank and Hall the state banking department various the Valley bank Crowell informed that department expected ment of the bank its total bad and doubtful which paper had provide which the would be willing the practicable program for dealing the situaMr. informed that first the was the the illegal paper for which Mitchell was Mr. expressed the opinion that the interests the bank would be best served the Mitchell from the presidency, but the immediate future considered desirable to retain his ices pending the up matters for which he was sponsible and which he was financially The above more fully appears from memorandum by Chief Examiner Wingate, copy of which is hereto tached and made part hereof, marked exhibit "In the early and middle part of January, 1924, the Pacific-Southwest Trust Savings bank of Los Angeles several times proached by one of the directors the Valley bank, Mr. Pierce, to ask that bank would not be interested in taking over the Valley bank, saying that everything in the bank was not running that there factions in the bank the management and control and that they viewing the coming season with some matter was taken up the Trust Savings bank also by Mr. George president of the California bank, who stated that the bank could had, that they and that he would be glad to turn the thing Trust Savings bank if was interested. Various banks in the San Joaquin valley over situa. tion. asked the Savings bank they would not the bank over, the being discussed among president the First National of formerly president the California The bank San Francisco asked the question, through Mr. and of that bank. The answer the Trust Sav ings bank all these inquiries that they not interested in the purchase of the Valley bank that did not want the Valley bank because they had representa tion the various places the San Joaquin valley and in taking over the Valley with its branches would either duplicate an already representation take points where they did not care to that their mergers basis, and that was no one in the the Valley attractive that they knew enough the in the Valley that had real problems which they did not desire carry. This position maintained until situation in the Valley critical, though they supported the Valley bank the extent of giving cured credit of in conjunction equal credits from the Bank of Italy and the Crocker National San Francisco. The request take over the bank came from sources and one time desire get rid of the Valley such that certain Crim, approached the ings bank, stating that they had the Valley for This offer was made the middle February the Valley bank the Southwest and of Italy and March 1924, these brokers through their claimed they were entitled the payment the price. copy of this letter demand attached hereto, made part hereof and marked exhibit 12. 'At about the same time the Valley bank to the Trust Savings bank, the Valley bank for the Bank of Italy, offer made by President between Mr. Mr. Saunders, and of the of Italy, San was January 1924. Mr. Mitchell told these the Bank Italy that banks was that the Valley bank write off certain assets, that the board directors, that rumors of that dissension getting on the side, and that conditions the Valley bank were rather critical, that had made up his mind to out, but wanted get out result of the sale and consequently offered the bank the Bank of Italy/ On behalf of the Bank of Italy, Mr. Giannini told Mr. Mitchell that the Bank of Italy already had two offices Fresno and was not interested in any more and that he not in the purchase of the Upon Mr. Mitchell's request that he defer judgment, Mr. Giannini said that in any he would not any sition he had first seen what there was and the condition of the institution Mr. Mitchell said that something had to be done and, if the result of the examination did not satisfy the Bank of Italy, asked whether they would agree lend the bank million dollars, to which Mr. Giannini that that also would depend upon the condition the bank. arranged that Mr. chief examiner of the Bank Italy, should company Mitchell and Mr. Saunders make the examination. Mr. Snyder made three day conjuneMr. Hays, vice president the Bank of Italy at Fresno. Upon Mr. Snyder's return to Francisco, after examining the Valley bank he reported that he had found $3,000,000 in bad and doubtful paper, and that in his estimation there would be loss $1,000,000 thereabouts. Some of the facts shown telegrams Mr. H. (Bill) Snyder and Giannini and January 23, copies of which hereto part and marked 13, 13b. Mr. Giannini had tion from Chief Deputy Janas that the to $275, 000. This was the sum which had referred to in the based information at hand the the examination. The telegrams Mr. Snyder upon investigation found the losses be several times amount, and upon the basis of Snyder's the Bank of Italy refused either make the requested loan to purchase the Valley bank. Some time about the middle 1924, Mr. H. Carr the First National Bank of Porterville, at that time president of the California Bankers' association, examined the assets of the Valley bank particular reference to their ability to give acceptable to the Crocker National bank for money borrowed from Crocker National bank by the Valley bank. As result of this was convinced that the Valley bank very losses least dollars in the Valley bank, and that, unless very and support, would its doors. Mr. Carr discussed the subject of his examination the Valley bank with Mr. Stern of the PacificSouthwest Trust Savings bank, and urged that the latter bank should money take over the Valley bank. Carr stated that time that he was interested the matter as local banker in the San Joaquin valley, because in the event that the Valley bank with eight nine branches the Valley closed doors, nothing could save the Valley from mendous disaster, that other banks would of necessity be caught same Mr. Carr further stated that his interest also president the California Bankers' association, and as such he was interested in averting financial catastrophe anywhere in the state. "On 23, 1924. during my absence the East, Mr. Graves, later president the Valley bank, accompanied by Mr. secretary, attorney and director the Valley bank, called on the chief deputy the offices of the State Banking department and stated that some of the directors were not cooperating in efforts to conditions the bank. They by the chief deputy that the department would forced take drastic steps in the any breaking faith as the perintendent seriousness situation and had, against his better on the by the directors themselves, given certain definite time than they asked which correct the within their bank. Mr. Graves stated that Bank of Italy did not want bank. It was learned time that Mitchell had tried borrow million dollars from the Bank Italy, the loan had not been made. January 24, 1924, at WorcesMassachusetts, received from deputy telegram taining report, which erroneous, that the Trust and Savings bank gotiating the purchase Valley the telegram stating that this adjustment was not sirable view of the conditions. The telegram reported that Mitchell reported be attempting deliver control Henderson that the Italy willing to take over the Valley bank necessary. telegram further stated that Mitchell had stated flatly that he was his loans and also that talking freely on the outside. informed by the chief deputy that he would instruct the directors remove Mitchell's obligations from the bank and would oppose sale excepting in extreme then only an institution to carry the This appears from the telegram itself, copy which hereto attached made part hereof. marked Exhibit In reply this telegram and January 24, 1924, wired the chief deputy that the Henderson control the bank was impossible and further stated that the Valley bank itself in the best position to handle was its affairs. ordered the chief not crowd Mitchell's deputy the point that would bring paper crisis that he the chief examiner should use their best judgment and that the result would be satisfactory; that I would return immediately if he considered This appears from the telegram itself, copy which hereto attached and part marked Exhibit 15. "On or about January 24, 1924, the of the Valley bank the that they decided try and procure to replace Mitchell, the president. Mr. H. Carr of Porterville, president of the California Bankers' association, and Mr. Carr called department and discussed the matter with the chief deputy. January 24, 1924, the chief deputy called Sargent, the assistant Federal Reserve agent, the phone, asked him what steps Federal Reserve bank was prepared to take in order the Valley bank. The reply was that they did not know what would do, anything; that examination had not given them any idea what steps could be taken to assist the Valley bank open. this change for the better had been made regard the within the Valley but the bank had in the fast losing ground. On January 1924, an run on the Valley was checked. During all this time, however, silent house had been going on, Valley bank having $700,000 in aggregate indeposits. "On January 1924, some of the directors of the Valley bank called at the state banking department and stated that they must have new man at the head their institution place of Mr. Mitchell, because none the banks, all of them havbeen approached in San Francisco and Angeles, would loan any money to the institution as long Mitchell remained at the head the bank. The Crocker National bank. the Bank Italy and the Federal Reserve bank all same attitude. The Crocker National bank had already loaned the Valley bank considerable sum money. About January 1924, Mr. Fagan of the Crocker National bank Mr. E. Fickett on the street in San Francisco. Mr. Fickett had just returned from Utah. Mr. Fagan inquired whether Mr. Fickett would be interested assuming the of the Valley bank, were offered to him, and finally prevailed upon Mr. Fickett to consider the matter. Mr. (Continued on Page Col.


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, November 27, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Superintendent Exposes Secret Meetings At Bank (Continued from Page 2) banking department and saw Chief* Deputy Janas and talked with him at length about the matter. Mr. Fickett also called upon the chief examiner: Mr. Wingate, and interviewed him regarding the affairs of the Valley bank, stating that he had under the possibility of accepting the management of the bank, that the proposition had been put up to him by Mr. Fagan and that he had the assurance of Mr. Fagan on behalf of the Crocker National bank of such additional financing the Valley bank as might be to carry it on in the event that he, Mr Fickett, would assume the management of its affairs. Mr. Fickett on the same day saw Mr. Graves, director the Valley bank and later its president, and made arrangements to go to Fresno with him further investigation. Mr. Fickett had been informed by the chief examiner that the state department would approve his by the Valley bank and its manager and would do in its power to cooperate with him to reestablish the affairs the Valley bank on a sound basis. Mr. Fickett was told by the chief deputy that the only interest of the department was in securing competent banking man to direct the activities of the institution during the present crisis, and that he would have to make his with the directors themselves. This Mr. Fickett did, making his arrangements through Director J. Graves of the Valley bank, later its "On February 1, 1924, number of the directors of Valley bank called at the state banking depart ment and had conference with Chief Examiner Wingate and Chief Deputy Janas, stating that they had met Mr. Fickett and were favorable to him, and that they had decided to elect Graves as president of the Valley bank in place of Mitchell The directors who called had for several days been to get the department to designate someone for them to take the presidency of the bank, but were informed that the department would not select any man for them, but that they must choose man for themselves. The result of their choice was the selection of J. J. Graves, capitalist of San Francisco and Fresno of considerable means. "Mr. Fickett later called at the department and informed the chief examiner that he had concluded to go to Fresno for the purpose of going over the paper, and was arranged that Examiner Barth should be present to assist in a review of the paper. On Sunday morning, February 3, 1924. Examiner Barth arrived in Fresno and met Mr. Fickett and Director Graves, and sat with Mr. Fickett during his ex- tion the amination of the commercial loans ference, Mitchell and his confidenof Director Graves, Cashier Crowell tial assistant, T. F. Saunders, asked for and had an with Chief and Assistant Cashier Hall. This Examiner Wingate and Examiner examination commenced at Bary. Mitchell gave rambling o'clock in the morning and was and report completed at 10 or 11 o'clock at of the alleged progress in night. The following day, February the affairs the bank. Examiner Barth sat with claiming that practically all the Mr. Fickett during his examination matters which found subject of the commercial loans at the to criticism in the examination had Sanger branch, commencing at been put over by other members of o'clock in morning in the the and finance compresence of Directors Graves and mittee during his absence in the Pierce and the manager and assistSaunders ant manager of the Sanger branch. whether or not the department had That afternoon Mr. Fickett exam determined upon change policy ined the loans at the from that enunciated at the meet Reedley branch, and that evening ing of the board of directors held he examined the loans at the at the office of the state banking West Fresno branch. This examindepartment on January which ation, as appears from the very the reply was made that any change statement of the matter, was inof policy was entirely matter for complete, Mr. Fickett having not the personal discretion of the sueven seen some of the branches. On perintendent of banks. The chief or about February 1924, Chief examiner that the department Examiner Wingate accompanied had knowledge the Chief Deputy Janas to the Crocker serve position the Valley bank National bank where they inter and of the fact that there was viewed Mr. Fagan and Mr. McCarlack of the ger, who agreed on behalf of the tors, and further that the credit of bank to furnish additional credit the bank had been depreciated althe Valley bank, contingent on the most the point, Mitchell bank securing a satisfactory manadmitted that the reserve position agement, and provided the Bank was critical. Mitchell further stated of Italy and the that he had endeavored to make Trust Savings bank would give credit arrangements with the like credit The chief deputy called Crocker National bank, but nothing on Mr. Giannini of the Bank of definite had been done except that Italy. The Crocker bank and Bank brief examination of their paper of Italy agreed to give a secured had made Sunday, Febcredit of $600,000 each, provided the ruary by E. Fickett. The chief Pacific Southwest Trust & Savexaminer Mitchell and ings bank would do likewise. This Saunders that the possibilities of the latter bank agreed to do. Many the as then presented inof the above facts are also shown volved necessity for the departby the memorandum of Chief Ex ment to change its policy the aminer Wingate, copy of which is event that the safety of the bank attached hereto and made a part might require it. Mitchell did not hereof, marked Exhibit 16. seem to appreciate the significance "On February 4, 1924, the chief of this statement. Mitchell and deputy called Mr. Graves and Mr. Saunders both referred to the lack Fickett at the Reedley branch, of cooperation on the part of the where they were examining the board of directors, intimating that paper of the Valley bank. They the majority of the board were then stated that they thought they against him. Both these gentlemen would be able to handle the situa- blamed Cashier Crowell particularly tion. Mr. Fickett returned to San and were very free in their charges Francisco and told Chief of bad faith and alleged loose talk Wingate that it appeared to him on the part of the other directors. there were about $600,000 of known The chief said that he had losses, and that he would try the knowledge of the coming meeting job and see he could keep the of the board of directors and stated bank open condition he could that he had personally no get sufficient credit to enable the instruction to be there, but that in bank to go through the harvest the event the superintendent of season. Mr. Fickett's plan was to banks instructed him to go to Frescut out the useless expense, stop no, he would be present at the meetthe run on the bank, possible, ing. The above more fully appears and get the bank in condition by from a memorandum by Chief Exmeans of assessments on the stock aminer Wingate and Examiner Bary to repair the capital of the bank. under date of February 5, 1924, Mr. Fickett was SO busily occupied, copy of which is hereto attached. however, in getting together notes made a part hereof and marked to discount to obtain money with Exhibit 17. which to pay depositors who were "On February 5, 1924, the chief withdrawing their deposits that he deputy met me in Los Angeles upon never succeeded in putting any of my return from my trip to Washhis plans into operation beyond ington. The chief deputy advised cutting the expenses of the opera- me as to what had been done with bank. to the Valley bank and of "On February 5, 1924, James N. the new matters which had arisen. Oliver, attorney for the state bank- On February 6, 1924, left for Fresno with the chief deputy to ating department, returned to San tend meeting of the board of diFrancisco from his trip to Washrectors which was to be held on ington. On that day Mr. Mitchell. February 1924, that being the president of the Valley bank, had date of the regular directors' meeta conference with Mr. Oliver in his ing. office concerning the affairs of the "On the morning of February Valley bank. Following this con1924, in Fresno, went to Mr. E. Fenstermacher's office. A committee consisting of several members of the board of directors of the Valley bank was there present, including Mr. Graves and Mr. Pierce. The discussed the situation, and while the discussion was going on they discussed the of Mr Mitchell resigning. Mr. Mitchell himself came into the discussed the situation with Mr. Mitchell signified to resign but to be retained as of the board of directors of the bank. told Mr. for the purpose of not disturbing the business of that institution would not object to that personally, provided he was only and had nothing whatever do with the financial conduct of the bank. then stated to the the board of directors what had said to Mr. Mitchell every director there took the stand that Mr. Mitchell could not remain in any capacity. It at meeting that first met Mr. Fickett who had been brought to Fresno by the directors. Mr. Fickett also stated if Mr. Mitchell in the bank in any capacity he, would not be interested in taking charge of the bank or proceedi further in the administration of the bank's affairs. At a meeting of the board of directors, about 'clock in the afternoon, Mr. Mitchell proceeded to take his position at the head of the directors' table for the purpose of conducting the meeting. then stated to him that it was my duty KEEP TRIM BISHOP'S BRAN CHOCOLATE Healthful Delightful Nourishing cakes Eat Bran It's good for man AT CANDY COUNTERS as superintendent of banks to demand his resignation as president of the Valley bank, and that would also demand his resignation as director: that his resignation as director would be held by me and acted upon at our discretion, but that his resignation as president would be accepted immediately. The board of directors then removed Mr. Mitchell as president of the bank and elected J. Graves to succeed him. Mr. Fickett was elected executive vice president. The directors refused to permit Mr. Mitchell to remain as chairman of the board, although had suggested that this be done in order that his resignation might not unnecessarily alarm the banking public. "The Valley bank later entered into an agreement with Mr. Fickett for his employment by the Valley bank, the agreement being drawn by the attorney for the Valley bank. Mr. E. J. The resolution employing Mr. Fickett recited that, Whereas, the Valley bank finds itself at present to be in need of special assistance, and whereas, it is desired by the board of directors of the Valley bank that J. E. Fickett be employed as executive vice president of the Valley bank, or in some other senior capacity that he might be employed by said


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, November 28, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DEPOSITORS HAD INKLING OF VALLEY BANK CONDITIONS Nearly $1,000,000 Of Deposits Withdrawn In Period In 1924 order that the people central California fully advised of the alleged Valley bank swindle, The Republican will complete state superintendent banks Governor Friend report will published in daily installments until completed. -Editor's INSTALLMENT Indicating that depositors Valley bank had least some knowledge, of the true within institution shortly before was told to close its doors merge with the PaBank Italy, revealed John FrankJohnson's report to Governor Richardson. This report shows between January February of 1924 in deposits were withdrawn, that even then the continuous drain deposits had not abated and that there incipient the institution. On Febduary 1924, the serves the Valley bank were deficient by $234,000 and the condition acute, the report states, fact, was serious that there close crisis in the San Joavalley. FINAL INSTALLMENT Following the final installment this article dealing with conditions in the bank explained by the banking superintendent the preface of report, the charges irregular illegal acts being second portion the report, publication which will begin tomor- "Upon assuming his position manager of the Valley bank, Mr. Fickett was forced to draw immediately the Bank of Italy for $100,000. order to keep the of bank. During the entire period there had been continuous silent run in progress, the individual posits from January to February being approximately $950.The drain on the deposits of the Valley abated and there incipient bank. The the bank had been sadly depleted and times deficient $190,000 even $200,000. the that Mr. Fickett could do, the grew steadworse and February Hon. Calkins, the governor the Federal bank, called office of the of and versation inquired the progress of the affairs of the Valley bank, advised that the situation quite Mr. Calkins then the Federal Reserve bank had far was possible for advancing credit Valbank, and further stated that for State BankDepartment California handle, that was its baby and its doorstep." That night left for Fresno call meeting clearing house what could done allay the uneasy feeling which was developing Fresno the Valley bank. CONDITION DISCUSSED "On Thursday, February 21. 1924, asked that meeting of the clearing house be called, which was held early that morning this discussed the condition which the Valley found itself on that date withdrawals deposits and disthe the public as the the Valley bank, being stated that the mathad even the subject of the this meeting that all agreed at by other banks for campaigns immediately be accounts called but conclusion reached to the best course to be by the clearing house pursued by of banks, decision was reached the advisability of public statement either, being the point those present that such statement might have the effect than allaying, aggravating, of the public. The matter was left open possible the following further February 25th. February 1924, little the day, discussed the gravity situation Fickett, the executive with vice Valley bank. president February 1924, the reserves On the Valley bank were deficient On account the increasing seriousness the situain the exercise of 'the sound discretion vested me the law for the protection of the depositors state banks, concluded call upon Bank Italy Trust bank, the two banks the state, quire what could pected from them the Not wishing to telephone from concerning of such gravity, driven Fowler by Fickett and there telephoned Mr. GianBank of Italy who Angeles. had called upon Mr. Stern Angeles that day concernthe alarming developing and advised that both Stern had +been of the same opinion and were willing sustain the situation and crisis in the San Joaquin valley; that they did not wish to under get the would do sidered necessary. returned Francisco on February and after conference with the officers department concluded to Mr. Giannini and Mr. Stern Fresno meeting held following Monday, February 25, 1924. On account the of the situation the Valley bank, on February 23, 1924, decided advance the meeting date one day, upon formation from Fickert that unless something was done immediately the bank would be unable open the following On night 1924, therefore, left for Fresno with my CALLED "On morning Sunday, February 24, 1924, conference held representatives the Bank of Italy, the PacificSouthwest Trust and Savings the State Banking For State Banking department there present and my attorney. Representing the Bank Italy there were Mr. Giannini, the Bank Italy, and Mr. chief For the PacificTrust bank there present Charles Stern, its executive and Sutherland, the Fresno managing director the PacificSouthwest Trust Savings bank. this conference various suggestions made to the method handling the situation which had developed, being evident one of must be determined upon: First, either assessment must levied once repair the capital bank; second, the banks would compelled take charge the bank purposes; or, third, the bank must sold banks carry the the directors must the bad paper bank. The directors the Valley bank had stated, as above set that an could met, and becoming ingly evident that met in time save bank. The closing this bank superintendent banks would damaging effect upon the munity upon the whole San Joaquin would probably have numerous banks the Val Sound tated but course, and dependent upon the the directors Valley its As the serious the Valley bank from my had come to the sion that existed to render that strong institution institutions step into the situation order protect depositors the Valbank and thus obviate catastrophe. opinion voiced the these two banks. action, exercising the vested me as perintendent of banks for the tection depositors of the ley bank, under the sincere belief that the only course could pursue in the performance my duty depositors of the Valley bank the was to to the board directors of the Valley bank the sale of institution sponsible which could the liability the Otherwise, the Valley depositors. bank guilty lations of the the it that the bank appearing conducting its in an unsafe its capital being impaired, and it being unsafe and continue and being unsafe for continue business, would have been my duty immediately take and charge of the bank for purposes liquidation. Although condition existed which warranted and demanded such course, not desire pursue that course until had discretion attempting protect deposiwhich would not tors have serious effect upon the community closing of the bank would need prompt action was further accentuated by the statement Fickett, the manager of the Valley called the conference to state his views situation. He stated that situation was becoming serious daily and fact had reached point where felt that he should be relieved further responsibility for cepting deposits with his then knowledge the bank's condition. He further stated that credit by the three banks the Valley bank had extended solely for the taking the normal borrowings by customers of the Valley bank during the cropping season in the belief time reorganization the bank and the resignation Mitchell president would remedy the that this hope had had actually developed that advances that time by the three banks had been most entirely in meeting with drawals Fickett stated that the condition of the Valley bank had proved to be much more serious than he believed be when he charge of the bank gave as his opinion that an entire resetting of the situation was necessary to save depositors from then urged the representatives the two banks take over the bank, or if they did not desire do this, to suggest other out. The representatives the two banks stated that they did wish to take over the bank terms suggested that they would cooperate in any efforts which might be made along other lines save the situation. made the suggestion Mr. Stern that the Trust and Savings would Valley bank that the Bank of Italy would stand any losses which might result the liquidathe assets. This offer was declined by Mr. Stern, countered with the same offer, which was likewise declined. Giannini offered the Trust Savings bank sum they would take over the situation and relieve Bank Italy responsibility This offer declined by Mr. Stern, who similar offer the Bank Italy they would take situation, which offer declined. The possibility finding another purchaser for the and it that efforts along be matter extension credit the opinion expressed by Fickthe shape notes Valley bank shortly exhausted, concluded that only further could banks declined assume the the bank singly, discussion the two the details the offer make the Valley bank purchase its assets and assume its liabilities. offer was expressed letter directed and signed Mr. Stern for the PacificMr. the of copy letand marked exhibit The two banks at this of themselves, copy of which hereto attached, part hereof, marked exhibit 21. "Both the Bank of Italy and the the offering put Trust Sav. offer in an form ings bank being members the be exercised any time that beFederal was close doors. sidered the this point my attorney said that consent of the Federal Reserve was manifest that the board the of the Valley run bank, which also member this or any other banking instituthe Federal Reserve system, Every tenor of questelegram be tions showed that the directors did the Federal Reserve board the position D. C., in which were in and stated that their bank was My attorraisin belt several banks ney that the condiboth systems, that the Valley tion such that there was not Bank Fresno in the heart of the only an undoubted of San valley close the greater than present following day unless taken over, rectorate handle, but that the that the Trust directors themselves were responand Savings bank and Bank for such money as had been Italy had consented jointly to sal- misappropriated by the officers vage the Valley bank upon terms their bank, and that in the opinion that considered right and effec- of the many illegal misand stated that must have appropriations had been made by the consent the Federal Reserve the officers of the bank, and that board on the following day to give some of the officers and directors the banks permission to take over had undoubtedly themselves and operate branches of the Valley liable to criminal prosecution. bank, adding that the banks were "It reported by one of the willing the job, but didn't directors that had started in This appears from copy the town which he came, upon the telegram itself, which branch the Valley bank attached, made part hereof also asked by marked exhibit called director better terms could Mr. Calkins, governor of the Fed- not be obtained. To this either my Reserve bank San Francisco, myself replied that the asking him what his attitude would department objection betbe reference the request terms could obtained. and the department permit the Pa- committee was for that Trust Savings purpose interview Charles bank or the Bank of Italy to take representing the Pacificover the Valley bank. Mr. Calkins Trust bank unable answer the inquiry that copy the had Mr. Stern and this telegram forwarded Washington for would presented to him the the terms of the proposal, and chief deputy. The requested percertain respects granted. reported "On February with my the Mr. Stern had attorney attended special meetassured them that would be glad of the board directors and they obtain terms officers of the Valley bank. this terms from other responsible meeting the situation was discussed parties offered money fully. The members of the board financially members were told that there were several the board directors they courses them. First, the would get under their board of directors that time institution's able and willing take out the bad further that he had agreed that paper the bank and the any before the transfer had replace the point money therein, they would be per- was impossible retransfer mitted forward. The board the assets, else could be secured directors signified their inability to take the do that. the Secondly, they purchasing banks would gladly turn the instiadvised that would then be necestution sary to levy imme- purchaser, dollar for dollar without diminution diately the The board unanimous their decision that this could not done on account of the general situation in the Valley being such that the could paid Originators Dollar Stores most the stockholders. Third, the board were advised that they would permitted the bank, the terms to anybody who willing to take and financially carry the burand failing in these $ propositions, would the duty of the state department take charge bank on the following and place in liqattorney stated the department had authority in the matter sale; that its authority was limited solely one of two things, the levying of an assessment repair the capital, the taking the bank for the purpose liquidation, or possibly of things, unless the board of directors immediately thing took necessary to repair the impairment capital, of the bank remove tal. The was by the directors they had and attorney replied they did not sell; that the banks had no power make sell, was not them sell, but that felt that sale responsible banks was not the way, but only way out Boxed Stationery other than for the superintendent take the institution Lady Mary. Very large forthwith. Several of the directors very beautiful quality. It's raised the point that they did not box. want either, and questioned the condition of the bank Extra Special for Saturday was such as to make any of these radical One director even asked that they lowed run and that Side Photo Swing Sizes from 5x7 to 8x10. finish, new styles. Extra Special for Saturday Carving Steak Set Good steel. Plated mighty good carving set. to $2.00. Extra Special for Saturday Boxed Stationery assets without charge. proposition of the directors and officers asuming personal responsibility for the bank with the credit offered by Mr. Stern representing the two purchasing banks, there no response. Mr. the president, and the strongest financially the stated that he did not intend to pledge his did not bewas strong body and oficers to acthat "Ddring the course of the meeting Director made oral offer to take the branch, and was had with reference this. of the the state the the the department had right this done, as the Monterey branch the soundest all the branches, of the Valley with the possible exception of the Coabranch, and that dismember the bank time when there was impairment would deprive the general creditors assets upon which they were titled felt that such course would unfair to the banks had come in request the superintendent of banks against their desire the situation. The department felt that the purchasing banks were entitled to such good assets the bank had and that force banks take bank the assets of the best branch been removed would not only unfair but would to these banks or any other bank. "Finally, to dispose of the conten- tion on the part of some of the rectors that the bank was able continue business with chance success, that the offer of purchase should transformed into option, my attorney inquired who in charge of the bank was informed that Mr. Fickett the executive vice president charge. At suggestion, therefore, Mr. Fickett was called into the asked statethe bank that time. The reply Mr. Fickett the effect that the not be the face run for two that he had just from Coalinga and other branch whither had gone in the hopes getting that would acceptable the banks that supporting the situation order obtain cash; that he had gotten down to the $300 note that bottom the note pouch had been that even was less than $100,000 that he would for this that felt there nothing with which continue business; that he been able to the money adnot vanced by the three banks that supporting the institution for the purpose for which the money was advanced. and that the continued steady had heavily drawn upon the bank's and that the purposes which the loans intended had been lost sight of money been withdrawals by the depositors. much discussion, and after or directors had tempted to leave without meeting and apparent that the superin- tendent of banks meant to take the institution in the event that the directors did intend to definitely (Continued on Page Col.


Article from The Fresno Morning Republican, December 7, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

REPORT SAYS EXAMINATION REVEALED $3,000,000 IN BAD PAPER Bank Of Italy Auditor Employed When Valley Institution Up For Sale In order that the of people central California may be fully advised of the alleged Valley bank swindle, The Republican will pubHsh the complete report of the state superintendent of banks to Governor Friend W. Richardson. This report will be published in daily installments until completed. -Editor's note. INSTALLMENT XII An examination of the books of the Valley bank in January of 1924, by an auditor for the Bank of Italy, revealed $3,000,000 in bad and doubtful paper, according to the report of John Franklin Johnson, state superintendent of banks, to Governor Richardson, which is being published in The Republican. The examination was made when the Valley bank was offered for sale to the Bank of Italy, the report states, and shortly before the time Johnson decided the bank must either close its doors or consent to a sale. The report cites the employment of J. E. Fickett as manager of the bank and a plan by him to save the institution from failure. It is said he was 80 busy discontinuing notes he could not carry out his ideas. In an incomplete examination of the bank Fickett is said to have found a loss of $600,000. The report continues: "Early in February, 1924, at the request of certain directors of the Valley bank, J. E. Fickett, prior to his employment by the Valley bank as its executive vice president, went to Fresno and made two-day examination of the head office and certain of the branches of the Valley bank as to the commercial loans. Although this examination by Mr. Fickett was not complete examination of all the paper of the bank, the examination complete for Mr. Fickett to determine that there was loss of at least $600,000 in the paper of the Valley bank. Mr. Fickett accepted employment by the Valley bank as its manager in the hope that if he could be successful in cutting down the exorbitant overhead of the bank. stop the payment of dividends, stop the run on the bank and absorb some of the losses by earnings and repair the capital by levying some assessment on the stock, the institution might be saved. As before stated, during his incumbency as manager of the Valley bank, he was SO occupied with discounting of notes and obtaining money to pay depositors with that he was never able to put his plans into execution. The credit arranged from other banks furnished money, which he could be used in the ordinary of the bank, but practically all of this money it was necessary to use for the payment of depositors and the institution had ceased to function as bank. Fickett found soon after he accepted employment by the Valley bank that his estimate of losses of $600,000 was far too low and that unless some drastic changes were made the bank would have to close. "In January, 1924, when the officers of the Valley bank asked the Bank of Italy for loan of a million dollars and offered to sell the bank to the Bank of Italy, the Bank of Italy sent its chief examiner, W. H. Snyder, to examine the Valley bank. Mr. Snyder had had many years of experience in the examination of banks, both for the state California and subsequently for the Bank of Italy. Mr. Snyder reported to the Bank of Italy that the loss in the paper of the Valley bank would amount to $1,500,000 or $1,600 and that there total of $3,000,000 of bad and doubtful paper in the Valley bank. This estimate of loss made by Mr. Snyder in January. 1924, was the nearest of early estimates to what will be the actual loss in the Valley bank STARTS EXAMINATION "Several months ago, in order that there might be no question concerning the condition of the Valley bank prior to its sale and that it might be determined what the loss would be, if any, which would be suffered by the Bank of Italy and the Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings bank by reason of their purchase of the Valley bank, as superintendent of banks, through my chief caused an examination to be commenced of the Bank of Italy and PacificSouthwest Trust & Savings bank +as to the condition and value of those assets acquired by said banks by purchase from the Valley bank on March 1, 1924. This examination was made by two experienced bank examiners, H. A. Sonne and E. McBride. In order that the examination should be ab. solutely impartial the chief examiner obtained the services of these two examiners the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. These men duly appointed and qualified as state bank examiners. Their only were given to them in writing by the chief examiner, and these instructions were as follows: You are hereby instructed make special examination of all which were taken the Valley Bank of Fresno by the Bank of Italy and Pacific Trust & Savings bank at the time of the purchase by these banks of the Val ley bank on or about March 1924 You are requested to establish complete list of assets as of the date of sale. You are also requested to establish the present condition and value of those assets which now remain.' The examination was con. ducted jointly and the final report was signed and verified jointly. copy of the report of examination made by Examiners Sonne and McBride is attached hereto, made part hereof. Exhibit 34. As to certain of the supplemental was made by two of the best of our state iners, John M. Gregory and W. B. Davis. This report of this supplemental examination by Messrs. Gregory and Davis which constituted part of the examination report of Sonne and McBride is attached hereto and made a part hereof. marked Exhibit 34a. The results of this supplemental exam ination are SO and such corruption have existed in the Valley bank that criminal action should be commenced by authorities of Fresno county. The Valley bank, on the first day of March, 1924, and for some time prior thereto was totally insolvent, and this conclusively appears from the report of above referred to embodied in Exhibits 34 and 34a. ASSUME LIQUIDATION "At the risk of prolixity, I will set down here the outstanding facts as to the condition of the Valley bank. These facts in themselves will the absolute insolvency of the Valley bank at all times here under consideration. The Valley bank on the date it sold its assets and business had deposit liabilities, including public deposits, amounting to $9,084,357.53; it had liabilities for borrowed money due to banks of 1,461,888.94; and other liabilities of $1,378.28. Under and by virtue of the purchase and sale agreement between the Valley bank and Pacific-Southwest Trust and Savings bank, a copy of which has been attached hereto, and made part hereof as Exhibit 25 (a subsequent agreement, Exhibit 26, having been entered into the PacificSouthwest Trust and Savings bank and Bank of Italy in accordance with prior agreement), the sale was made in consideration of the assumption by the purchasing bank of all liabilities of the selling bank, excepting the capital, surplus and undivided profits of the selling bank. The liabilities assumed, therefore, amounted to $10,547,624.75. In addition, the purchasing bank assumed the burden of liquida- tion of the revolving fund hereinafter described, representing the capital, surplus and undivided profits accounts of the Valley bank, totaling $1,071,512.92. The assets taken over by this purchase and sale in face value to $11,619,137.67. Their actual value, however, with which we are most concerned, did not to the liabilities assumed by the purchasing banks. This condition, of course, means that the Valley bank was insolvent at the time of the sale. "Of the loans taken over on March 1924, amounting to $8, 160,207.45, there has been paid amounts reducing the loans held on May 26. 1926, to $5,058,849.93 These paid, of represented about half of the good loans held by the Valley bank, and great deal of this was by of the loans with the Bank of Italy or the and Savings bank such transactions being the equivalent of payment full, 80 far as the liquidation of the the Valley bank is concerned. Securities and of course, were taken over and worth practically their face By this process of reduction, the assets of the Valley bank held by the Bank of Italy and the Trust and Savings bank on May 26, 1925, amounted to ,690,052. of which about $5,000,000 represent the face value of loans. It was in this body of loans chiefly that losses existed which Valley bank insolvent prior to its The value of these assets has been carefully appraised. Of the said assets acquired from the Valley bank and now held by Bank of Italy and Trust and Savings bank, totaling $5,690, 052 the good assets amount to $3,219,767.03. The assets of doubtful value amount to $642, 003.04 The bad assets, constituting determined losses, amount $1,253,119 addition to the above there is an item of $575,162 which represents the amount at which certain assets were carried on the books of the Valley bank, to banking houses, $268,392.84; furniture and fixtures and vaults, at branches, head office vaults, $33,135.09; head office furniture and fixtures, $54,740.25 head office 38 LOSSES NOT DETERMINED "In addition determinal losses above specified, however, there are additional losses which can not be determined in exact amount at this time, but can be closely estimated from experience and knowledge of the general character of the loans and other assets. For instance, even in those assets classified as good assets, inasmuch as many of the loans are predicated upon real estate or real estate equities, liquidation will depend largely upon sale of the land or the ability of the borrower to re. fund. very large percentage of the real estate are without sufficient margin to assure liquidation by the latter course and closing out of these loans will necessarily be very slow. In very large percentage of cases, experience shows that margins and equities are wiped out and destroyed by adverse conditions which develop in the af fairs of the borrowers. A loss of from 5 per cent to 10 per cent in this classification of loans is probable. In the doubtful assets, losses are probable but not as yet fully determined. The losses in these assets will be very substanti and in many instances the assets will prove worthless, although still of some recovery The losses this classification, therefore, will amount to at least 50 per cent The assets above set out as bad constitute loans and other securities which are uncol lectible worthless. In the unclassified that is the banking house and furniture and fixtures, the total amount of loss at this time can not be accurately stated, inasmuch as the value of these assets is subject to adjudication under the purchase and sale agreement. However, it is absolutely certain that heavy losses will be taken in this classification of assets. For instance, the of the head office of the Valley bank to the First National Bank in Fresno for This repreloss of $15,000, although the furniture and fixtures were sold for the best obtainable price. The head office construction of $81,069.38 represents total loss. This figure represents the cost of remodeling the head office of the Valley bank, which was held under lease. This item represented an expense item and was never an asset in any of the word. Included in unclassified assets, there were other amounts which represent losses. The furniture and fixtures and vault accounts for the branches the Valley bank include very substantial Item of loss, the cost being exorbitant in some in stances and the class of furniture and fixtures in some instances be. ing out of all proportion to the character of the community and the size of the branch and the amount of the branch. Of this the Reedley branch was example No deprecia tion or little depreciation had ever been charged against the furniture and fixtures accounts of the Valley bank. In the unclassified assets, therefore at the figure of $575. there certain loss of at least $125,000 and' probably (Continued Tomorrow)