State Bank (Wolford, ND)

Episode Information

Episode UID
77071671513
Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
state
Bank ID
7707167 routing
Routing Number
77-0716
Start Date
January 19, 1926
Location
Wolford, North Dakota (48.499, -99.704)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
b96743709eb31eef

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles refer to an appointed receiver and ensuing litigation; no runs reported.

Events (2)

1. January 19, 1926 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
L. R. Baird as receiver for the State Bank of Wolford, vs the Northwestern Trust company was filed in the supreme court today.
Source
newspapers
2. January 19, 1926 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Bank insolvent and a receiver was appointed to take charge of the bank
Newspaper Excerpt
L. R. Baird as receiver for the State Bank of Wolford
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

Article from The Bismarck Tribune, January 19, 1926

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Ramsey Co. Court Order Is Appealed to Supreme Court Appeal from an order of the Ramsey county district court overruling demurrers to parts of the defendant's answer in the case of L. R. Baird as receiver for the State Bank of Wolford, vs the Northwestern Trust company was filed in the supreme court today. The case represents an effort on the part of the receiver to collect on the bonds of R. H. Sugden, vice president and cashier, and Haroid A. Lutz, assistant cashier of the bank. The bonds were issued by the defendant to protect the bank against dishonest and fraud on the part of the two bank officials. The defendant contends that the plaintiff did not file claims against the bonding company in the proper manner' or within the required period of time.


Article from The Bismarck Tribune, November 10, 1927

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FROM MCHENRY COUNTY The Anamoose National Bank, a corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent -VS- Jacob J. Dockter, et al, Michael Dockter and J. M. Cockter, Defendants and Appellants. SYLLABUS: (1) Parol evidence is admissible to show whether a party is an accommodation party on a negotiable instrument, and also, to determine which party is accommodated. (2) When there is a dispute in the evidence, the question of whether a negotiable instrument is for the accommodation of the payee or some other party is a question of fact for the jury. (3) Notes made payable to a bank for the sole purpose of deceiving the bank examiner, are for the accommodation of the bank, without consideration, and the bank as a going concern cannot recover thereon. Appeal from the District Court, McHenry County, North Dakota, Hon. C. W. Buttz, Judge. REVERSED. Opinion of the court by Burke, J. Peter /.. Winter, attorney for Appellants, McClusky, North Dakota. Wooledge & Hanson, attorneys for Respondent, Minot, North Dakota. FROM RAMSEY COUNTY L. R. Baird, as Receiver of the State Bank of Wolford, North Dakota, a corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant -VS- Northwestern Trust company, a corporation, Defendant and Respondent. SYLLABUS: (1) Where a fidelity bond, bonding an employe of a domestic banking corporation, stipulates that such bond shall cover losses sustained during the term of the bond and discovered at any time within six months after the expiration or cancellation thereof, the fact that during the term of such bond the bank becomes insolvent and is closed and no receiver is appointed therefor until after the expiration of the term of the bond, does not extend the time within which discovery must be made six months after the date of the appointment of the receiver. (2) Where a fidelity bond, bonding an employe of a domestic banking corporation, stipulates that such bond shall cover losses sustained during the term of the bond and discovered at any time within six months after the expiration or cancellation thereof, and neither notice of loss given nor proof of claim filed states the time of discovery of the loss, the surety does not waive the right to contest liability under the bond by its conduct in permitting the insured to give notice of claim, file proof of loss and submit the books and records of the bank for examination without advising the insured that it tends to rely upon the terms of the bond requiring loss to be discovered within six months after the date of the expiration or cancellation thereof. (3) A


Article from The Bismarck Tribune, November 12, 1927

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# Ramsey County Court # Sustained in Decision Actions against surety companies to collect on the bonds of defaulting bank officials must be started within the time limits fixed by the bond and failure to appoint a receiver to handle the affairs of an insolvent bank does not operate to extend the time limit, the supreme court has held in the case of L. R. Baird, as receiver of the state bank of Wolford vs. the Northwestern Trust company. The case was appealed by Baird from the Ramsey county district