gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
5d2600fe57e1e0e9
Response Measures
None
Description
OCR shows variant spelling 'Benkleman'; articles describe state guaranty fund commission taking charge but do not clearly state permanent closing.
Events (1)
1.June 1, 1928*Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
State guaranty fund commission took charge of the bank and was operating it as a going concern; assets declared immune from seizure while in commission control
Newspaper Excerpt
merchandise creditor sought to levy on the assets of the Citizens' bank of Benkleman within month after the commission took charge and was operating going concern
Source
newspapers
Newspaper Articles (2)
1.July 6, 1928Lincoln Journal StarLincoln, NE
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
CAN'T LEVY UPON OF BANKS
WHEN IN HANDS OF COMMISSION THEY ARE IMMUNE.
Court Also Holds That as Long Bank Is Operated by Commission Suit May Be
The state guaranty fund commission won one important supreme court Friday, and dropped another of almost equal importThe was one from Dundy county, which involved the question of the assets state bank charge of the commission are from seizure on on judgments secured against the institution. The court, in an opinion by Judge Good, holds that when the bank taken over the titled time in which whether may to its officers and operated going concern shall closed and affairs up. During that time the assets be levied by the judgment cred itors of the bank. What reasonable time which to make such deter mination is held to question fact, determined from the facts and ex isting the particular case. Where creditor complains that the time unreasonable the burden of proof on him. The case came from Dundy county, where merchandise creditor sought to levy assets the Citizens' bank of kleman within month after the commission took charge and while conThe creditors raised the constitutionality of the the appel
2.July 6, 1928Lincoln Journal StarLincoln, NE
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
MAJ. ARTHURO FERRARIN UPON SHARES IN FLIGHT HONORS OF
WHEN IN HANDS OF COMMISSION THEY ARE IMMUNE.
Court Also Holds That as Long Bank Is Operated by Commission Suit May Be Maintained.
The state guaranty fund commission won one important lawsuit in supreme court Friday, and dropped another of almost equal importance. The case was one from Dundy county, which involved the question of whether the assets of state bank in charge of the commission are immune from seizure on execution on judgments secured against the institution. The court, in an opinion by Judge Good, holds that when the bank taken over the titled to reasonable time in which to whether it may be its officers and operated going concern or shall be closed and its affairs wound up During that time the assets cannot be levied on by the judgment creditors of the bank. What constitutes reasonable time in which to make such determination is held to question of fact, not of law. and determined from the facts and conditions existing the particular case. Where creditor complains that the time is unreasonable the burden proof on him. The case came from Dundy county. where merchandise creditor sought to levy on the assets of the Citizens' bank of Benkleman within month after the commission took charge and was operating going concern. The creditors raised the constitutionality of the law in the appel-
Bank runs are almost always and everywhere a deterioration of bank fundamentals.
But not for you.
You are the measure-zero exception: great fundamentals, solid bank, and yet the Diamond Dybvig fairy spread its rumor. Depositors woke up. Your collateral was not prepositioned. The Clearinghouse had it for you.
Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Go directly to jail… or worse.
