Article Text
Case to Jury Damage Hearing Next. The case of Joseph Mleynek against Katherine Kasper and action for specific in which the claims possession of half of land, located and half miles west of Irving. belonging the estate of the late Joseph being tried in the Marshall county district court, will be jury at o'clock completed the introduction of testimony late yesterday afternoon and counsel for the fense waived the right of rebuttal The plaintiff claims possession the property by virtue of oral contract entered into Joseph Mleynek and his late Mary Mleynek, their marriage in Mleynek. then Mary Hula, would named heir all his plaintiff alleges. When Mleynek died last November will which provided bequests five relatives, friends, Cemetery tion. Irving high school and the hemian church and $5 to the plaintiff. Asks Real Estate Commission. Impanelling jury in the Adolph Riggert against Otto Linkugel for the judgment of estate will begin the the Kasper the Riggert. resident of Washington defendant found indebted him in the $400. which alleges to owing for the purchaser last year for Linku160-acre farm in Herkimer township. The of Charles W Johnson, receiver the State Bank of merfield and Mrs. Jacob Volle, for the foreclosure of on 240-acre farm in Richland township and for the recovery of money alleged to be owing promissory note, was decided by the when counsel for both parties had reached partial agreement trial before Of the total judgment the plainasked for, the defendant the the exception $2,300 disputed credit. The claimed more than the the disputed credit paid by the of note to retire interest on two large notes. The bank ceiver claimed the note was given of other obligations and not to interest pay The bank also held as collateral note in the sum of $766. secured mortgage and issued by Conahy Volle. Volle claimed that the note was placed the bank the convenience of the maker pay interest but that the bank had converted it and he sued for its The plaintiff agreed to surrender the $766 note in and the court ordered him to deliver the mortgage, securing it, the defendant. The court sustained the demurrer of the plaintiff to the defendant's evidence the note for en by defendant, by reason that consideration was given. The court found the receiver to have judgment against the defendant in the sum of which found to be secured mortgage and declared the mortgage third lien. Sale of the real tate was ordered. In the case of William and William Home City for the recovery of the principal and interest owing on four promissory notes ago for the the were have judgment against the defendant in the representing the principal and accrued interest. The replevin action of White, (Continued on Last