gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
79b168cfa89ca386
Response Measures
None
Description
Only a court docket entry is available stating the receiver's report was approved; additional articles could confirm suspension/closure details.
Events (1)
1.March 10, 1886Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
W. H. H. Bowers vs. the London Bank of Utah; receiver's report approved.
Source
newspapers
Newspaper Articles (2)
1.March 10, 1886Salt Lake Evening DemocratSalt Lake City, UT
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
THIRD DISTRICT COURT. Disposition of Cases Before Judge Zane This Morning. The following cases came up before Judge Zane in the Third District Court this morning: John Bastian et al. vs. John A. Groesbeck; continued for the term. William Naylor et al. vs. Thomas Pierpont et al. ; judgment by default against William B. Pace, and judgment by agreement against Pace and Pierpont for note and interest, less payments, and $25 attorney's fees. Hogle vs. Anderson; set for the 22d inst. United States vs. O.J. Salisbury et al. ; ten days additional time to file amended complaint. W. H. H. Bowers vs. the London Bank of Utah; receiver's report approved. Oswald Muller vs. Frank James et al. ; motion to discharge attachment argued and taken under advisement.
2.March 10, 1886Salt Lake Evening DemocratSalt Lake City, UT
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
THIRD DISTRICT COURT. Disposition of Cases Before Judge Zane This Morning. The following cases came up before Judge Zane in the Third District Court this morning: John Bastian et al. vs. John A. Groesbeck; continued for the term. William Naylor et al. vs. Thomas Pierpont et al. ; judgment by default against William B. Pace, and judgment by agreement against Pace and Pierpont for note and interest, less payments, and $25 attorney's fees. Hogle vs. Anderson; set for the 22d inst. United States vs. O.J. Salisbury et al. ; ten days additional time to file amended complaint. W. H. H. Bowers vs. the London Bank of Utah; receiver's report approved. Oswald Muller vs. Frank James et al.; motion to discharge attachment argued and taken under advisement.
Bank runs are almost always and everywhere a deterioration of bank fundamentals.
But not for you.
You are the measure-zero exception: great fundamentals, solid bank, and yet the Diamond Dybvig fairy spread its rumor. Depositors woke up. Your collateral was not prepositioned. The Clearinghouse had it for you.
Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Go directly to jail… or worse.
