Article Text
REBUKE FROM THE COURT THE SUPREME TRIBUNAL PRODS CARELESS BANK DIRECTORS. Case of Citizens' Bank of Union City, Ind.-Matters in the Local Courts. A sharp rebuke to careless bank directors was administered yesterday by the Indiana Supreme Court through Justice Dowling in the case of the late Citizens' Bank of Union City against its directors. In addition to administering the "scoring" the higher court affirmed a judgment of $50,000 recovered by the receiver of the bank from the directors. The board of directors was charged with acts of neglect numbering 119, among which were: Allowing the bank to take several thousand dollars' worth of worthless paper at face value from a bank to whose business *it succeeded; taking a large amount of real estate at excessive valuation; allowing overdrafts that were never settled; permitting the president and cashier to squander the bank's funds and to appropriate $25,000 each to their own use. The officers of the bank have been tried for embezzlemnt, but were acquitted. Justice Dowling said the directors had the means of knowing and were bound to know the value of paper and securities held by the bank, and that they were also bound to know the habits and character of the men they allowed to manage the bank. Continuing the learned judge said: "Under the statutes of this State the directors of a bank are the agents of the corporation, having the general custody, control and management of its property and affairs, and, as such agents, they are liable to account for all of the property of the corporation which has been intrusted to their control and management. For mere errors of judgment they are not responsible, but for losses and waste of money and property, occurring through their gross inattention to the busines of the bank, or their willful violation of their duties they * are liable. "It should be plainly understood by gentlemen occupying the position of directors in a bank that they are not mere lay figures, but that they have actual and responsible duties to perform, and that by gross inattention to those duties, resulting in the waste or loss of the capital of the bank, they render themselves liable to the corporation. A primary duty is that they should understand the financial condition of the bank. They owe this duty to the shareholders, the depositors and other creditors, and to the public. "Ignorance of the important transactions of the corporation, and of the general state of its affairs, unless excusable for some special reason which it is incumbent on them to establish, constitutes no defense to an action for damages for losses OCcasioned by or traceable to their failure to perform their official duties."