6176. First State Bank (Owensville, IN)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
December 1, 1931*
Location
Owensville, Indiana (38.272, -87.688)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
8db31ac2

Response Measures

None

Description

No newspaper article describes a depositor run. The bank had closed its doors last December (Dec 1931) and the state bank commissioner filed for a receiver; a receiver (Paul Brazelton) was appointed in Feb 1932. Litigation concerns separating assets after a merger/acquisition with the Old State Bank; bank remains closed and a receiver was appointed.

Events (3)

1. December 1, 1931* Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
State bank commissioner filed suit asking appointment of a receiver; bank had ceased operations and state action led to receivership proceedings.
Newspaper Excerpt
The resulting bank... closed its doors last December.
Source
newspapers
2. February 19, 1932 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Paul Brazelton this afternoon appointed by Judge Claude Smith in circuit court receiver for the First State bank of Owensville.
Source
newspapers
3. June 30, 1932 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
action seeking an accounting of assets... the principal point sought by the plaintiff to have assets of the First State bank at the time the two banks joined, separated from the combined assets and restored to the First State bank.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (5)

Article from Princeton Daily Clarion, February 8, 1932

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FIRST STATE BANK RECEIVER ASKED Another application for a bank receiver has been filed in circuit court. The title of the application is state commissioner of Indiana. against the First State bank of Owensville. A hearing is set for February 19 in the circuit courtroom. This action is supplementary to a suit filed some time ago in which a receiver was asked for the Owensville State bank and Old State bank. For man E. Knowles was named receiver. The Owensville State bank was the result of merger of two banks, the Old State and the First State banks.


Article from Princeton Daily Clarion, February 19, 1932

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Paul Brazelton this afternoon appointed by Judge Claude Smith in circuit court receiver for the First State bank of Owensville. The action taken by the court in the cently filed entitled State of Indiana on the Relation of Luther Symons, bank commissioner of state of Indiana against the First State bank an action the apointment of receiver. This afternoon Mr. Symons testified briefly on the stand to the bank. On question by the court, Mr. Symons advised that separate receiver be appointed rather than naming Forman Knowles, receiver of the Old State bank to that place. Judge bond $10,000 and fixed his fee month and five cent of the gross of the farms of the bank. The court asked Mr. Brazelton to secure The court against cautioned Mr. Knowles not to allow any of the offiof the bank access to the bank building and stated that the officers have no right in the bank.


Article from Evansville Courier and Press, February 20, 1932

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

OWENSVILLE BANK RECEIVER NAMED Paul Brazelton Appointed to Take Charge of Affairs of First State Bank Judge in the circuit court this afternoon appointed Paul of receiper for the State of Owenspille. Application for been by Luther state The closed doors 22. that time was understood that it formed the Old bank and First State in ville months But mons testified that been later shown that the Old State bank bought the First State bank. Recently E. Knowles Owensville appointed receiver for the Old State Symons arate Knowles both in court, said they could in Suits have the court finance boards of Gibson and Wabash from signers of bank bonds money on the Owensville State bank at the time closed doors These actions judgments aggregating $78,000 from Columbus of the bank, and signers of the bank's personal bonds.


Article from Princeton Daily Clarion, May 19, 1932

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

TAKING VENUE IN ANOTHER BANK RECEIVER ACTION Change of venue from Special Judge John K. Chappell, of Petersburg, in the suit of Paul Brazelton. receiver for the First State bank of Owensville against Forman Knowles, receiver for the Owensville State bank. an action to "unscramble" bank assets. was taken this morning by Attorney T. Morton McDonald for Receiver Brazelton. Judge Claude A. Smith named Henry Kister, Hovey C. Kirk and 8. L. Vandeveer from whom to strike. The parLies are to strike by Monday morning.


Article from Princeton Daily Clarion, June 30, 1932

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BANK RECEIVER ACTION IS AGAIN IN CIRCUIT COURT ARGUMENTS HEARD IN LITIGATION GROWING OUT OF ATTEMPT TO SEPARATE ASSETS OF ONE OWENSVILLE BANK FROM THOSE OF ANOTHER The case of Paul Braselton, as re- ceiver for the First State bank of Owensville against Forman E. Knowles as receiver for the Owensville State bank: Warrick Johnson, Albert W. Thompson and James R. Montgomery as trustees for shareholders of the Owensville State bank: representatives of stockholders of the Old State bank: certificates of deposit in the Old State bank and depositors of the same bank. an action seeking an accounting of assets, came up again in circuit court today, before Special Judge S. L. Vandeveer. The case has been pending for some time and on June 25 the Gibson county board of finance was granted permission to be made party defendant. Several Issues Involved The case is considerably involved However, the principal point sought by the plaintiff to have assets of the First State bank at the time the two banks joined, separated from the combined assets and restored to the First State bank. This is sought under the theory that there was no bona fide merger but that the Old State at tempted to buy the First State bank. The resulting bank. known as the Ow ensville State bank, closed its doors last December. Under the merger theory the original assets of the First State bank would be assets of the Owensville State bank and could be levied against by the receiver of the closed institution. Arguments were heard today on a demurrer the complaint. Both sides seemed to admit that there was no law providing for merger of the two state banks. The defense, however, held that whether the result ing bank. which operated under the charter of the Old State bank was "de jure," "de facto" or simply a partnership. it did business as bank none the less and that all who entered into its operation were equally bound.