Bank of Whiting - Whiting, IN

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: state
Start Date: October 16, 1910
Location: Whiting, Indiana (41.680, -87.494)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: af907325eab8f181

Response Measures

None

Description

Article (Lake County Times, 1911-09-16) references a receiver's final report for the Bank of Whiting covering time to Oct 16, 1910, and court orders payment of remaining balance to a judgment creditor and charges the Bank of Whiting. No mention of a depositor run in the excerpt; the bank was in receivership (closed) and appears not to have reopened. Date of appointment not given; receiver's report covers through 1910-10-16.

Events (2)

1. October 16, 1910 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: Bank of Whiting vs. Herma Mietke et al. Receiver files final report covering time from date of appointment to Oct. 16, 1910, showing receipts ... Balance approved. Receiver asks for an order of court to pay balance to judgment creditor. Bank of Whiting charged. Receiver files receipt and is ... (Lake County Times, 1911-09-16).
Source: newspapers

2. September 16, 1911 Other

Newspaper Excerpt: Court approves receiver's final report and orders payment of balance to judgment creditor; receiver files receipt (proceedings reported in court docket).
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (1)

1. September 16, 1911 The Lake County Times Hammond, IN

Article from The Lake County Times, September 16, 1911

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Court. Granted. Given (120) )210 pue 000'91$ JO uns up puoq Joj days for bill of exceptions, with National Surety Co., or American Surety Co. or Peter W. Meyn sureties. Each separately approv "pe Court Room No. 2. Charle 'SA at 10 Ballard G 3 5055 Glattli. Appeal dismissed. 5056. Mat McGraw vs. Harry Bartor et al. Appeal dismissed. N 5058. Mat McGraw VS. Charles Glattli Appeal dismissed. 5060. Sophia Glattli vs. Harry Barton Appeal dismissed. $ 5061. Harry Barton vs. Mat McGraw 1 Appeal dismissed. 5190. Frank W. Clinton et al. vs. Hun 8 garian Reformed Church of U. et al. Plaintiff asks and is grante leave to file substituted complaint 5444. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. vs. L Heintz. Plaintiff dismisses Judgment. 5709. William Ahlborn Co. vs. Lottie Johnson. Defendant's attorney C suggests death of defendant asks that stubstituted. Edde E. Maplestone 6459. Edward R. O'Donnell vs. Mar I Blume. Court files and makes 7 special findings of facts, which now signed. Also his conclusion of law theron which are also a ed both of which are ordered mad 0 part of the record in this and the defendant now excepts each of the conclusions of numbered 1 to 4 inclusive. Judg ment on the findings and conclu S sions of law. n e 3520. George E. Vermett vs. Biernacki, Argument on demurre e in heard. advisement. Court takes matter unde J 5734. Bank of Whiting vs. Herma Mietke et al. Receiver files final port covering time from date of pointment to Oct. 16, 1910, showing '08's 10 receipts u & $255.78, balance of $224.22. Repor approved. Receiver asks for an / der of court to pay balance to LL judgment creditor. Bank of Whit I ing, and shows to the court tha 7 the balance is less than deficienc A Receiver creditor. inemspnf enp u M dered to pay said balance to judg ment creditor, Bank of Whiting charged. Receiver files receipt and is 6710. Delbert A. Pugh vs. V. Horac Messenger et al. All defendant 's file motion for new trial. ar 7773. Rudolph Hegener Co. vs. Solo mon G. Joseph et al, Defendant Tol ST leston disclaimer. Lumber and Coal Co. -I Court Room No. 1. -1 ичог 'SA Connors Beatrice 9021 " nors. Defendant defaulted. 1- st 7741. Nellie Reich vs. August Reich Defendant defaulted. Find u plaintiff gratning divorce and tody of child, Raymond, age years. To pay costs and not to ry ment. for two years. (Enjoined). Judg 01 Court Room No. 3. to 6097. Fred Newell vs. Dr. James 91 Clark et al. All depositions are 14 dered published. ft 6988. John V. Farwell Co. VS. a Popovich et al. Find for plainti I for $899.68. Judgment. e- 7020. Lester F. Ladd vs. Clarence Je Smith et al. Finding for defend u ants. Judgment. 1, 7141. Katy Kish et al. VS. Frank eu hel et al. Plaintiff dismisses agains ee Ryhel, wife of defendar Frank Ryhel. Cause submitted court: finding that parties are titled to partition and that inter ests are as set forth in complain Interlocutory judgment in tion. Find that property if 'E visible and that it should be 'O; Charles H. Frederich appointe JO commisisoner to sell. He is p quired to furnish bond in sum se $3,500 for faithful performance qo his duties and now files such PI T T and Edd W George 4114 as sureties. Bond approved. pu vate sale. Three weeks' notice uo publication in weekly newspape -9 published in East Chicago. Findin -a that defendant Frank Ryhel -1 chargeable with rents receive amount to be determined at time distribution and then charged him. otherwise distribution to made according to interests herein fixed. Sale to be for all if obtainable: otherwise one-thir cash, one-third in one year one-third in two years, to be cured by mortgage. 8024. Theresa Young vs. Peter Young Plaintiff dismisses, costs paid. 5825. Calumet Lumber Co. VS. Brink et al. Plaintiff dismisses against Louis A. Bryan, Evva Bryan and Calumet Land Co. 7471. John Sestric VS. Mary Sestri Defendant defaulted. Find ment. plaintiff granting divorce. 7476. In re. change of name of Banazig. Find for petition changing name to Imbro Vrbancic. 7507. Fred W. Schuletz et al. VS. Kenziora et al. Defendant ziora suggests name to be and case proceeds against her der that name. Find for plainti