Guarantee Trust & Banking Company (Atlanta, GA)

Episode Information

Episode Type
Suspension β†’ Closure
Start Date
March 31, 1913
Location
Atlanta, Georgia (33.749, -84.388)
Bank Type
trust

Metadata

Notes

Court actions appointed receivers and restrained business; articles state the concern failed several months ago.

Events (3)

1. March 31, 1913 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Court action seeking appointment of a receiver and restraining company from carrying on business due to insufficient reserve and alleged misappropriation.
Newspaper Excerpt
TRUST COMPANY IN TROUBLE. Atlanta, Ga., March 31.-The Guarantee Trust and Banking Company today was ordered by Judge George L. Bell of the Superior Court to appear before the court April 15 to show cause why a receiver for the company should not be appointed.
Source
newspapers
2. June 21, 1913 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
GUARANTEE TRUST CAN MEET DEBTS ... He named John D. Robison, of A. M. Robinson Company, receiver, but this is merely a nominal appointment, as the receivership is held up pending the filing of a bill of exceptions, and then pending the outcome of the case in the Supreme Court. The order of the court restrains the company from carrying on its business, other than conserving assets.
Source
newspapers
3. March 28, 1914 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
A warranty deed conveying the old Atlanta National Bank Building ... from the Atlanta Savings Bank to James D. Robinson and Harold Hirsch, receivers for the owners, the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company, went to record Saturday. The figure was $60,000.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (12)

Article from The Sentinel=record, April 1, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

TRUST COMPANY IN TROUBLE

Atlanta, Ga., March 31.-The Guarantee Trust and Banking Company today was ordered by Judge George L. Bell of the Superior Court to appear before the court April 15 to show cause why a receiver for the company should not be appointed. Action by Judge Bell followed the institution of two suits against the company by two stockholders and


Article from Atlanta Georgian, June 16, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Receivership for Guarantee Trust Is Opposed by 600 Four hundred bondholders, representing $193,815. and 200 stockholders, representing 1,715 shares of the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company. petitioned the Superior Court Monday morning not to appoint a receivership for the company. The case was reopened before Judge John T. Pendleton and will take three or four days before a decision is reached. The petitioners asked that they be allowed to intervene as defendants in the litigation. Their attorneys are Rosser & Brandon, Napier, Wright & Wood and Tye. Peeples & Jordan.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, June 20, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

APPEAL CERTAIN IN GUARANTEE TRUST TRIAL If Bankruptcy Action Is Pressed, Suit Will Go to United States Supreme Court. Attorneys for plaintiffs and defendant in the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company case Thursday are trying to reach an agreement as to who shall be named receiver for the corporation, and as to the status of the business pending final outcome of the litigation on appeal. Judge Pendleton will issue an order when the lawyers reach an agreement. Prospects are this will be late Thursday. When the suit was started holders of investment bonds of the company were notified of the state of affairs and given their choice of paying installments as they became due. or holding payment pending adjudication, their bonds to remain in the same status as at the beginning of the legal action. Appeal Is Certain. The court's order Thursday is expected to determine just how far the company can proceed in carrying on its business, besides naming the receiver. Appeal is certain and efforts will be made to get decision quickly from the Supreme Court of the State. Meanwhile there is an action in involuntary bankruptcy pending in the Federal courts, and this may. be pressed. If so, the case may go to the United States Supreme Court. The case has been fought bitterly since trial began May 5. Attorneys say there is every prospect of a continued lively contest through the upper courts. Bondholders Few Here. Holders of the investment bonds are said to be comparatively few in Atlanta and in Georgia. Most of the sales have been in Northern States. It is these widely scattered investors who are most interested in the outcome. Briefly, the corporation offered a bond, sold on installments, yielding a most attractive rate of interest. Allegations of the plaintiffs, upheld by the lower court yesterday, are that an insufficient reserve was carried against these bonds; that investments of the corporation were not sound, and that the very origin of the concern was irregular in that owners of the old company, which the Guarantee took over, profited unduly by the sale.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, June 21, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

GUARANTEE TRUST CAN MEET DEBTS Insolvency of the Guarantee and Trust Company, because it has not a sufficient reserve fund, is the "solid ground" upon which Judge John T. Pendleton rests his decision against that concern, according to the order he has entered in the case. He states that the company has sufficient assets to cover its liabilities, but that it does not meet with the requirements of the act of 1904, which requires that there be enough assets invested to equal the reserve fund with 3 1-2 per cent interest. Many of the investments of the Guarantee, he says, are "in the teeth of the act of 1904." The concern is trustee of the reserve fund in every sense of the term, he says, and while legal title to this fund remains with the company, the beneficiary interest is with the bondholders. Part of this reserve, he holds, has been misappropriated. He named John D. Robison, of A. M. Robinson Company, receiver, but this is merely a nominal appointment, as the receivership is held up pending the filing of a bill of exceptions, and then pending the outcome of the case in the Supreme Court. The order of the court restrains the company from carrying on its business, other than conserving assets.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, July 15, 1913

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Guarantee Heads To Be Defendants Judge Pendleton announced from the bench Tuesday that he would issue an order in the Guarantee Banking and Trust Company litigation making S. E. Smith, president of the company; H. S. Miles, secretary and treasurer, and W. A. Foster and George H. Sims, directors, parties defendant in the action. J. N. Robertson, appointed receiver for the company pending a decision by the Supreme Court, will act as receiver for the property of the four men, keeping it intact until the litigation is settled.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 28, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Building to Receivers

* A warranty deed conveying the old Atlanta National Bank Building, on East Albama street, near Pryor, from the Atlanta Savings Bank to James D. Robinson and Harold Hirsch, receivers for the owners, the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company, went to record Saturday, The figure was $60,000. The receivers obtained a loan of $50,000 from the Savings Bank on property on West Peachtree street, 100 feet south of Hunnicutt: on West Cain, 150 feet east of Orme street, and No. 139 West Peachtree street, near Pine.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 28, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Building to Receivers

A warranty deed conveying the old Atlanta National Bank Building, on East Albama street, near Pryor, from the Atlanta Savings Bank to James D. Robinson and Harold Hirsch, receivers for the owners, the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company, went to record Saturday, The figure was $60,000. The receivers obtained a loan of $50,000 from the Savings Bank on property on West Peachtree street, 100 feet south of Hunnicutt; on West Cain, 150 feet east of Orme street, and No. 139 West Peachtree street, near Pine.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 28, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Building to Receivers

A warranty deed conveying the old Atlanta National Bank Building, on East Albama street, near Pryor, from the Atlanta Savings Bank to James D. Robinson and Harold Hirsch, receivers for the owners, the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company, went to record Saturday, The figure was $60,000. The receivers Γ³btained a loan of $50,000 from the Savings Bank on property on West Peachtree street, 100 feet south of Hunnicutt: on West Cain, 150 feet east of Orme street, and No. 139 West Peachtree street, near Pine.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 30, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Bank Building to Receivers

A warranty deed conveying the old Atlanta National Bank Building, on East Albama street, near Pryor, from the Atlanta Savings Bank to James D. Robinson and Harold Hirsch, receivers for the owners, the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company, went to record Saturday. The figure was $60,000. The receivers obtained a loan of $50,000 from the Savings Bank on property on West Peachtree street, 100 feet south of Hunnicutt: on West Cain, 150 feet east of Orme street, and No. 139 West Peachtree street, near Pine.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 31, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.

A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.

The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 31, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.

A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.

The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.


Article from Atlanta Georgian, March 31, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.

A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.

The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.