Article Text
STENECK REVIEW
(Continued) liam Kelly as trustees and executhe
Waste Charged The Steneck Trust Co., which had been before brought, selling trust fund for relief of the money in Trust The heirs asked that Mrs. Amalia widow be named substitute executor and trusthe remaining funds The Steneck Trust Co. and Commissioner the held liable for Steneck and which were said Nicholas died June 26, 1929 his will named his trust company executor and trustee his which vided follows $100,000 to be held trust fund for benefit and the and for charities, which the trustees were to arbiters: the to be divided equally the widow: and the the was they per cent. age and quarter the period until their entire share received. In September, 1930. the executors told the amountFrom this the fund subtracted. Mrs of $131. and the 21, of his
Poor Fund Lost
The set for the had about Part this, caused charges among which charges of and movie attorney fees and execucited. These funds. was claimed. were withdrawn. notice wos given to the and no court The suit also charged that the Nicholas $100,000, kept sound Trust stock. That claimed, worthless the closing the and the fund provided for the wiped The attorney general brought into the the complainants the the beneficiaries of the $100,000
Many Suits Filed
From time the closing the June, right the time, there of suits in ery and the courts. Persons large money on de posit institution closed subsequently reduced beggary. Others had funds deposit the bank sued the bonds mortgages, and for suits were brought by hold. mortgage participation certificates demanding that the bank the banking them as holders of the underlying mortgages the paid liquidation the debt had aside trust accounts segregated from the general funds bank. directed ment the but where the funds the had not especially set aside, courts held they had become and not be earmarked and and could out the There cases in which officers of organizations and treasurers sought have their funds declared held the bank trust. the courts held almost variably the bank had failed funds and mingled general not aside kept from the funds was released the that hundreds per had entrusted their sav. other agencies their meagre fortunes because Steneck Trust Co. bank as depository of the funds of priority of claims, in groups trust claimed have legal pref manded they others were presented passed courts result great expense the ready by the ing the great state which maintains the
Claimant
Picking up the chronological story On the spotlight Charles Chancery turned the as yesterday Other features in the case transpired follows Kelly 1932 would apply to Chancery Court for pay depositors and other creditors per
City Charges Fraud
Four later Kelly asked Chan Court permission eight per cent There dividend Around Kelly, through his counsel, Milton, bills in Chancery Court settle the mass on instructions on how the On Dec. the City of Ho five suits Chancery Court Trenton against the Steneck Trust Commissioner Kelly establish the status claims for tied the city the was trust suits fraud the accepting posits after the and directors verge closing. alleged Henry Steneck, treasurer of the Hoboken Sinking had illegally placing money his bank without authori-
From Africa" The story broke
Co. had acted illegally in loaning him money so could its own Minervini testified that, suspicious the bank's condition month closed, he had gone to Henry Steneck and asked the Steneck bank had been posted for the coming from your Steneck told the latter The "man from Africa' never rived. did, he never stock. Judge Thomas Brown ruled against Minervini, holding that though bank had acted illegally loaning money stock the state was really offended Harry Periberg Fielder of the of the Steneck Trust Commissioner The switch was the result charges by the heirs Nicholas Steneck that the bank grossly wasted and mismanaged the estate. Trial of the Steneck brothers first set for 27, John G. Judge March 13 the ground that he unprepared as he thought Merritt Lane On March was announced Judge O'Regan postponed the trial which had been set for March The grounds that the banking holiday declared by would prevent trial "free from and counsel to the records in the Delay Trial Again
On April the trial Judge had yet been not sit. Trial have the Seaboard Trust the and business of the Trust Co. was April The next day the Trust was On June defense counsel were turned down by Justice Harry Heher pleas for postponement, struck jury change separation of day Judge rejected by defense but delay of June that take to Part the On June which had set for action taken. had already allowed delay until Defense returned before Judge June peated their motions denied June On June 26 Lewis the State Banking Department's the Trust Co. the assets and the Steneck Trust Co., and announced bank open on Sept. (The