Reading National Bank & Trust Company (Reading, PA)

Episode Information

Episode UID
488701613
Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
48870 national
Charter Number
4887
Start Date
May 1, 1934*
Location
Reading, Pennsylvania (40.336, -75.927)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
f903f69cf4941995

Response Measures

None

Receivership Details

Depositor recovery rate
40.0%
Date receivership started
1934-10-27
Share of assets assessed as good
26.9%
Share of assets assessed as doubtful
49.1%
Share of assets assessed as worthless
24.1%

Description

Conservatorship and RFC advance in May preceded appointment of a receiver later in 1934.

Events (5)

1. March 11, 1893 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. May 1, 1934* Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Conservator appointed and RFC loan/advance authorized to aid reorganization/liquidation
Newspaper Excerpt
the Reading National Bank and Trust Company, Reading Penn., conservator, $1,972,000
Source
newspapers
3. October 27, 1934 Receivership
Source
historical_nic
4. November 9, 1934 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Harvey Adams named receiver the Reading National bank last week.
Source
newspapers
5. December 24, 1934 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
petitions ... for the receivers for the Reading National Bank and Trust company ... to exchange mortgages on dwellings for Home Owners Loan corporation bonds paying 2% percent interest
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

Article from Florence Morning News, August 12, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Advances in May By RFC Aggregate Over $168,000,000 Money Lent to Pay Back Taxes Saves Homes and Aids Local Government The Reconstruction Finance Corporation reported today that it authorized advances in May aggregating $168,644,166 The report showed that loans authorized to banks and other financial institutions at 4 per cent interest totaled $57,512,410. Other large advances authorized included $41,820,000. Other large advances authorized included $41,820,000 for subscription to preferred stocks in banks $45,000,000 for the Home Owners' Loan Corporation: $5,455.500 in loans to drainage and irrigation projects. The balance was for relief and other government purposes. Banks Get Bulk Of the $57,512,410 authorized in loans, $32,698,236 went to banks and trust companies, including $28.615,330 to aid in the reorganization or liquidation of closed institutions and $22,048.883 to mortgage loan companies. Among some of the larger loans authorized to banks were: United States Savings Bank, receiver Washington, D. C., $1,080,000; North-Western Trust and Savings Bank, receiver, Chicago, $2,500,000 West Side Trust and Savings Bank, receiver. Chicago, $1,500,000; Calcasieu National Bank, Lake Charles, Louisiana, $1,965,480; Commercial National Bank of Philadelphia conservator, $2,540,000; Farmers National Bank and Trust Company 650,000; Penn National Bank and Trust Company, Reading, Penna. conservator, $1,190,000; and the Reading National Bank and Trust Company, Reading Penn., conservator, $1,972,000 Of the loans authorized to mort gage loan companies. $10,000,000 was for the Electric Home and Farm Authority at Chattanooga Tenn.: $2,382,493 to the Santa Ana Mortgage Investment Company, Santa Ana. Calif., and $1,000,000 to the Textile Industry Mortgage Company in New York City. Preferred Stock Subscriptions Authority for a loan of $2,5000.000 at 4 per cent interest to the board of deposits of Wisconsin at Madison was granted but no part of this sum had been disbursed up to May 31. Subscriptions on preferred stocks in banks included: The First National Bank and Trust Company, Bridgeport, Conn. $1,000,000 Fidelity Union Trust Company, Newark, N. J., $7,000.000 Central United National Bank. Cleveland. Ohio, $8,000,000 and the City National Bank and Trust Company, Columbus, Ohio, $1,000.000. The corporation also authorized a purchase of $1,500,000 in debentures. of the Mississippi Valley Trust Company, St. Louis, and 9 loan of $3,500,000 on the Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company to. the Globe Rehabilitation Company, Ltd. New York, none of which had been disbursed up to May 31.


Article from Reading Times, November 9, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

FARMERS' BANK RECEIVER Appointment of Former Trust Executive Made at Washington Edward Nolan, 437 Oley yesterday was appointed receiver for the Farmers' National bank. Announcement of the appointment came through the Washington office the comptroller of the currency, O'Connor. Nolan said he had been notified of his appointment would accept the The appointment effective immediately, Nolan will be on the job today, he said. His work will consist of liquidating the assets of the bank and making distribution to depositors creditors. Nolan well known in Reading and Pennsylvania financial circles. He executive president of the Colonial Trust company for number of years, and from 1902 1921 was vice president of the First National bank, before its merger with the old Pennsylvania Trust He brother Bennett Nolan, Reading lawyer and historian. Nolan's appointment gives two Reading's three defunct banks ceivers. Harvey Adams named receiver the Reading National bank last week. None has appointed for the Penn National bank. although the name Harold Bright for the post Wayne Weber has turned down the appointment.


Article from Reading Times, December 24, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

HOLC BONDS SOUGHT BY BANK RECEIVERS Would Exchange Mortgages for Securities Judge Frederick A. Marx heard petitions Saturday by bank receivers for permission to exchange mortgages on dwellings for Home Owners Loan corporation bonds paying 2% percent interest. The petitions were presented by C. Weidner, attorney for the receiver of Farmers National Bank and Trust company and William McKee Rutter and George B Balmer, attorneys for the receivers for the Reading National Bank and Trust company and for the Penn National Bank and Trust company. The mortgages, more than 100 in number, involved more than $200.000 in the case of each banking institution. The petitions, which were unopposed, were hold under