4665. Sheridan Trust & Savings Bank (Chicago, IL)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
savings bank
Start Date
January 25, 1933
Location
Chicago, Illinois (41.850, -87.650)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
681d5cb1

Response Measures

None

Description

The articles refer to the Sheridan Trust & Savings Bank as already closed and in receivership; no run is described. The coverage discusses receivers' settlements and a receiver petition regarding bank-owned property. Cause of closure is not specified in the articles, so classified as suspension leading to closure (receivership/liquidation).

Events (2)

1. January 25, 1933 Suspension
Cause Details
Articles indicate the bank was closed and in receivership/liquidation, but do not state the triggering cause (no run or specific insolvency cause described).
Newspaper Excerpt
the closed Sheridan Trust and Savbank
Source
newspapers
2. February 10, 1933 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
The receiver Ernest ... of the closed Sheridan Trust and Savbank. ... Ridgeway stated ... the receiver held the offer of $2,500 to be reasonable ... Judge Burke continued the hearing on the petition for two weeks to permit an investigation.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Chicago Tribune, January 25, 1933

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DEFUNCT BANK OWNERS EVADING STOCK LIABILITY Reveal Laxity of State Law Enforcement. Only 1½ per cent of the stockhold. ers' liability has been collected for creditors of the 140 closed state banks in Cook county while almost 20 per cent of such liability has been collected for creditors of the 19 Cook county national banks in liquidation. This was revealed yesterday from study of receivers' reports and records of the state office. The total liability of the stcckholders in the 140 state banks-100 per cent over the amount of stock 40 million dollars. Collections to date have totaled little more than $600,000 In the case of the 19 banks the liability is and total of has been collected from this source for the creditors. Difference in Laws. This disparity is ascribed by lawyers receiverships and foreclosures to the different methods of against the stockholders, as provided and state bank ing laws. and to laxity in the enforcement of existing state legislation. When national bank is closed receiver is appointed by the controller of the currency at Washington and the receiver immediately adds 100 per cent stock to the assets the bank. He then sends out claims to the stockholders, and if they do not comply within reasonable time goes into federal state court of equity and obtains judgments against The Illinois banking act imposes no upon the receiver, nominated by the state auditor, to collect from the The law vides any creditor may suit in court equity and that the may appoint a receiver handle the double liability collections. This leads to the filing of "dummy suits in the interest of the stockholders themselves tiements can be made. according to the for the bar Makes Delay Possible. It also makes possible, they declare long delays that permit the dissipation concealment of assets the collection of excessive fees by and their lawyers. settlement is effected suits filed against the stock holders are referred to masters chancery for hearings and the fees come out of collections. This is in addition to fees for the receiver under the liability usually 10 per cent of all fees for the receiver's from 10 to 25 and fees for the creditors' attorneys in the same amount. The also makes possible multiplicity of suits. In the case of the Kaspar American State bank different creditors' suits were filed and three receivers appointed by the three judges before the creditors agreed upon receiver. Settle for 40 Per Cent. The for bank creditors the double liability law includes $530,000 from settlements made by stockholders of three banks. to the state auditor's office. These South Side Sav. ings bank. the Sheridan Trust and Savings and the Northwestern Trust and Savings bank. Receivers and their attorneys took $132,000 in fees out of total settlement of $662,000. which was 40 per cent of the liability. The state auditors' reports on the of banks do not show what are made on stock ments, such collections, if being combined with others under the head ing Receipts from collections, etc., to be disbursed." The reports of the supervising receiver of the national banks, however, separate entries entitled Collections from stock assessments."


Article from Chicago Tribune, February 10, 1933

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

KERNER IN COURT TO FIGHT LOSS TO BANK CREDITORS Opposes Waiving Title to Site Winning Award. Attorney General Otto Kerner ap. peared in for the first time since he took office to press his campaign against costs in bank receiverships and Before Circuit Judge Joseph Burke he vigorously opposed the petition of bank receiver to waive title to property about to receive $12,000 condemnation award in return for $2 500. The attorney general charged the prayer of the petition is audacious and ridiculous His assistant, George S. Lavin, asked that the receiver be called into court to explain his action. The receiver Ernest of the closed Sheridan Trust and Savbank. $12,000 Award Fixed by Court. The property is strip 33 feet wide and 230 deep at Estes and Western avenues. It was deeded to the bank by Earl G. Gubbins after the bank closed to secure portion of total indebtedness of $50,000. After the deed was executed the city undertook the Improvement of Estes avenue and ht condemnation proceedings against the property. An award of $12,000 was fixed by the courts. In his petition Ridgeway stated that Gubbins came to him and told him he had no title to the property, even though he pledged it for loan. Gubbins was said to have declared the strip belonged to the adjoining Park Castle apartments, of which he was one of the owners. Suspicious of Generosity. Ridgeway held the offer of $2,500 to be reasonable in view of the circumstances. Attorney Perry B. Brelin of the law firm of Brundage, Landon & Holt, attorneys for the receiver, said the building had paid attorneys' fees of $2,500 the condemnation proceed ings, and the owners were willing to pay taxes of $3,000 and assume judg. ments of $10,000 against the land. There is something funny here," Attorney Lavin said. The award is one of $12,000. Yet the building is willing to pay $2,500 to the bank, $2,500 to lawyers, $3,000 in taxes, and meet judgments of $10,000. No one is so generous without reason. Allows Time for Inquiry. Further it peculiar that the receiver so readily accepts Gubbins' story. when there is nothing to substantiate other than his word. The records the title to the property is the hands of the bank. Why should the receiver be anxious to waive it? We want to go into this and find out what, if anything, is behind it. There is mystery here that should be brought to the attention of the court." At the request of the attorney gen eral, Judge Burke continued the hearing on the petition for two weeks to permit an investigation.