Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
until their full worth can be obtained, and by keeping down expense in closing the business. the estate should realize to the depositors in to 80 per cent: and we take this opportunity to warn depositors against the sale of their accounts at n much less figure than the above indicates. Todo 80 will be a positive loss to themselves The Receiver reported liabilities were S1. 315,034. 23: the Receiver's reported assets were $015,637. 21: showing a deficit of $388,516.00 Items In the assets of the Receiver might safely have been placed much higher by the appraiser, en. pecially of the real estate, and many of the nocalled worthless or Impaired Indebtedness will prove to be of more than estimated value. In fact, we think that there should he realized from this Increase a greater som than sufficient to pay all the expenses of closing the estate. Take, for instance. the bank buildings and mafe-deposit Yauits, The property in located in that part of our city where every day It inust become more and more valuable. regardiess how It may be rated by appraisers. The deposit buildings, bank building, and vaults have cust a large amount of money: the vaults are adequate. the demand for them Increases every day. and their PROCESS na an Institution of necessi. ty In Chicago has been secured, and. an shown by the answer of the Receiver to our Inquiry, they now obtain an income equal to all expense of their care, and 0 per cent upon the valuation of that property. This enterprise. on the part of the bank officials. was well devised. and would have nitimately been n surree of great profit to the bank. The property on LaSalle street, we think, has been estimated too low. It is located directly opposite the new Court House, now in process of construe tion, and must increase in value without doubt: also the property on Madison street, corner of Fifth avenue, line been estimated at $21,000 less than was paid for It by the bank. Few locations In the city are better than this. Similar considerations govern In much of the other real estate Inventoried: and In the hands of an owner not coin. pelled to sacrifice by immediate wale. would prove of far greater value than in how anticipated As to the SouthChicago property. theCommitteothink that from the Inception of the loan the transaction has been an unfavorable one to the bank, embarrassing its affairs much. and liable to cost Its depositors heavily if not handled with extreme good вение. There is now # probability of an Improvement of the selling value of the lands at an early day, for reason of Improvements that are being made near thereto, and a restoration of the fron works interests. Your Committee have suggested that this and other real estate. which can only apprectate In selling value by the lapse of time. be retained until reasonable prices can be obtained. In the estimates of the Receiver of amounts of notes and net values of same, be line only taken face values, and not added accumulated Interest, as should have been done where securities have been ample. This, also, will Increase the assets of the bank to a considerable extent, and, as all such notes continue to draw interest, much gain will be the result. The net value of the bonds and mortgages held by the bank in placed at $261,050.23: of this amount there was due at the time of making the report of the Receiver $86,070.02 $8,820 will be due prior to Jan. 1. 1878: $11, 525 from Jan. 1, INTH. to Jan. 1, 1870: $7,572. 16 from Jan. 1870, to Jan. 1, 1880: and $127,357.05 will be due during the years 1880, 1881. and 1882. The collateral and demand loans are very largely due or will become due at an early day. and your Commuttee not only think, but are advised by the Rdceiver. that there will be a second dividend declared at no remote day. The Committee think that the best Interests of the creditors will be subserved by the sale of all securities where the date of payment 14 later than Jan. 1. 1878; provided the same can be sold without encrifice. As much prejudice had resulted from the action of the bank during its last month' history. in pay. ment of claims. the Committee examined its Journat for the month of September, Its recelpts during that month- 1st to 22d, inclusive -were $21,801. 18: 11a payments were S100, 142.03, muchof which was by male of real estate and securities in settle. ment of accounts. The Receiver has promised that If he shall find that any injury has unlawfully been done to the depositors by any settlement he will cause the same to be brought to the attention of the Court. As tonching the cost of closing the business of the corporation. your Committee made verbal inquiries of the Receiver, and such written ones DM are hereto appended, and he states that be cannot make an estimate that would be reliable. We believe him to be honestly workIng In the Interest of the creditors, but are of opin. ton that he should have given such statement of the cost of his work as would better enable 114 to estimate the dividend which depositors should oh. tain. Very properly. depositors recensitive unon this subject. Creditors have been PO frequently wronged. an they think. by the extravazance and corruption of Receivers that the creditors of the Fidelity. as the only parties In Interest. think they have right to know from the Receiver somewhat of the expense be shall make In settling their burl. nere and returning to them their moneys. We think he will not neglect your Interests in the col. lection of the assets, and he should receive n good salary for his time and responsibility while 80 doing: but certainly he should state the maximum he shall require. and any what compensation he shall allow to his attorneys and connsel. The thousands of depositors of the bank. many of whom have their all In his hands, and are to-day In necessitous circum- tances, should be advised as to these inquiries, that they shall have no cause for anxiety In this matter; and without the information nsked for. every account for attorney's fees or compensation to Receiver will be serutinized with great *ensitiveness. The Receiver tells us that It in his purpose to keep the expenses down to the lowest possible figure consistent with the heat interests of the estate, but while we realize the fact that creditors can obtain comparatively little Information as to expense until his last ruport shall have been made to the bank, we can only have full confidence when he shall have given use frank statement of his proposed expense. To the Receiver we are indented for most courteous treatment as n Committee, and to the officers, also, for the frankness with which they have given un information. We have appeared hereto the questions submitted to the Receiver by the Committee and his answers thereto, which are to be regarded as part of this report. Respectfully sumblited. CHARLES E. FELTON. A. P. DERICKSON. E. HETCHINS. QUESTIONS PUT TO THE RECEIVER. Following is the report of the Interview hetween Dr. Turpin and the Committee. III which the latter Is always the questioner and the Recelver the respondent: Q.-In your report to the Court are Ibere any an. acts that are liable to depreciate If not disposed of at an early date, and, If $0, blease state what those assets are? A.-1 to not think of anything. Q.-Aro there not many assets which are liable 0 to appreciate in value If delay 10 made in their enle? A. think so: Receivers should have ample time to negotiate sales. am looking forward to better times at no for distant day. your report of securities have you given face value of indebtedness, or have you given face value with unpaid interest added? A.-1 have given face value only, except In case of past-duo coupons. Q.-Nos. 143. 145. and 147 Randolph street, Mr. John C. Ilaines says, cost about $315. 000: your estimate was $102. 000, shrinkage of n $123,000. By retaining this property for as time, any one or two years, you not think it might be sold for at least $210,0001 A.-1 think from $220, 000 to $210,000. think that the Safe De. pository is appraised too low, In this, that nothing was allowed for the good will of the business. think the good-will a worth at least $25, 000. and that this sun, 000 should be added to our valuation. of the bank building, think the appraisors' value about the real alue. or the Safe Deposit building, think it is the best property for its rating in the City of Chicago on account of pro. Income. spective 7 Q.-May not the Income from this property now be sufficient to pay expenses of Its care, taxes, etc., and u per cent per annum on your valuation? A. FO far as the Safe Depusitory, No. 143 Randolph street, is concerned. Q.-No. 78 LaSalle street Is directly opposite to the main entrance to the new Court. House. You have placed its value at $18,000. The size of the lot is ways by 80 feet: is not that property worth $1,200 per funt, or what you think it will be