Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
was competent, and admitted it. Then Attorney Craine read the resolution of the directors passed on May 5, 1900, appointing a teller at a salary of $65 a month. Leroy Coyle was also named as a bookkeeper at that time The appointments were for one year. Mr. Wagner's evidence was important as showing Van Horn to be a regular employe of the bank. He was not cross-examined.
### W. H. HOOVED CALLED.
W. H. Hoover, of New Berlin, was next called. He said he was about the bank during the last two years. He saw Van Horn there acting as both teller and bookkeeper. Bachtel, the witness said, was cashier. Hoover was not cross-examined.
### HARVEY P. PACKER.
Harvey P. Packer, a bookkeeper for W. L. Davis, vice president of the Canton State bank, was called and said he was employed by Davis for 13 years. He was shown a check which he identified. This he deposited in the Canton State bank. It was the one which figures in the Indictment. On a note attached to this was the word "hold." Packer made out the check to himself and endorsed it in the absence of Davis, supposed to be the real maker, and took it to the bank, together with the deposit check.
The witness was shown the stub on the check book. The defense objected strenuously to the reading of the stub which was allowed under objection. The word "hold" was written by the witness an hour or two after the deposit was made. He went to the bank and asked an employe to pin the slip marked "hold" upon it after the bank had closed.
The witness could not remember when he saw the check the second time, so a second check, a duplicate of the first, was shown him. This was made May 1, 1905, to replace the original. Packer said he went to the bank with the second check to take up the first one. The first check, made Dec. 22, 1904, the deposit slip and the check made May 1, 1905, were offered in evidence, together with the slip marked "hold." All except the second check were admitted under exceptions, which were sustained in the case of the second check.
### AFTERNOON SESSION.
When court reconvened at 1 o'clock Tuesday afternoon Packer was put on the stand again and cross-examined by Attorney Siddall. He was questioned at length as to the notations on one of the check-book stubs. Witness could not tell where Davis was when he (Packer) drew the check on Dec. 22, 1904. The checks, he said, were left blank and signed by him.
Attorney Siddall persisted in declaring that Packer did not appear positive as to anything, but had merely used his best recollection. To this side remark Attorney Craine objected, and the court sustained this objection. Davis, it appeared, drew up a check on a stone company for the purpose, he admitted on redirect examination, to give credit to Davis' personal account and not the account of the stone company.
### RECEIVER BARBOUR ON STAND.
James G. Barbour, one of the receivers of the Canton State bank, was next called to explain about the bookkeeping system in vogue at the bank. He described the various books and records, which be brought along.
He was asked to produce a daily ledger and brought up a book. He said it was the daily ledger. He turned to an entry of Dec. 22, 1904. He said Van Horn made the entries on page 286. Attorney Craine offered the book and entry as evidence. This was strenuously objected to by the defense, which sought to interrupt the direct examination so as to cross-examine. The court ruled against Attorney William A. Lynch, and declined to admit the entry at the present time.
Barbour was shown another book, the journal, and identified an entry made there by Van Horn corresponding with the entry in the daily ledger. It was soon after this that the question of admitting this in evidence was brought up. This precipitated the above move on the part of the defense to knockout the indictment.