Article Text
No. 2276-E. C. Bartholomew, receiver, vs. city of Austin. No. 2280-E. C. Bartholomew, receiver, vs. city of Austin No. 2281-F. C. Bartholomew, receiver, VS. city of Austin. No. 2282-Dwight, Skinner & Co.vs. Jackson, Cramer & March. No. 2283-J. G. Bourne vs. Wells, Fargo & company. No. 2284-Albart Wade va. Travis county. No. 2285-Keith Bros. VS. Woody & Perry. No. 2286-15. C. Bartholomew, receiver, VS. city of Austin. No. 2287-The State of Texas vs. Galveston. Harrisburg and San Antonio Railway company. No. 2288-The State of Texas vs. Houston and Texas Central Railway company. LAW DOCKET-DISTRICT COURT. No. 894-The United States vs. A. M. Jackson et al. No. 897-J. W. Foster, receiver, vs. John W. Snyder (on appeal). No. 899-The United States VS. Robert G. Charlton et al. No. 900-The United States vs. Stilwell H. Russell et al. No. 916-H. P. Hilliard, receiver, vs. James G. Burleson. No. 919-H. P. Hilliard, receiver, vs. W. T. Moore. Jr. No. 922-H. P. Hilliard, receiver, VS. Charles L. Lauderdale. No. 923-The United States VS. Henry Andrews et al. No. 924-H. P. Hilliard. receiver, vs. C. S. Stoudenmier, garnishee No. 925-H. P. Hilliard. receiver, vs. C. S. Stoudenmier, garnishee. CHANCERY DOCKET. No. 55-City of San Antonio VS. Thomas J. Mehaffy. No. 82-A. B. Abercromble, asignee, VS. P. J. Willis & Bro. et al. No. 91-Clark B. Harman vs. commissioneral general land office. No. 172-The Mercantile Trust company vs. Missouri, Kansas and Texas railway et al. No. 191-James T. Hair & Co. VS. J. M. Day and James Ford. No. 191-Groton Bridge and Manufacturing company vs. Burns & Dillon et al. No. 195-Galveston, Harrisburg and San Antonio Railway company VS. John H. Reagan et al. No. 201-Samuel B. Huey et al VS. Austin Water, Light and Power company et al. No. 202-The New York Security and Trust company et al. VS. Equitable Mortgage company. No. 204-Washington Trust company vs. City of Austin Sewerage company. No. 205-Honry F. Nash vs. New York and Texas Land company (limited). No. 206-A. M. Lee et al VS. F. D. Hatch et al. No. 207-Penn Mutual Life Insurance company vs. city of Austin et al (on appeal). No. 208-H. H. Kerr, receiver. vs. First National bank of Lampasas et al. No. 200-Henry L. Preston vs. R. W. Finley, comptroller. CRIMINAL DOCKET. No. 1103-The United States VS. T. A. Scott; smuggling. No. 1104-The United States vs. Thomas Clark and Thomas Burns: theft from postoffice. No. 1105-The United States vs. Thomas Clark and Thomas Burns; breaking into postoffice. No. 1114-The United States vs. M. L. Woods; misapplication National bank funds. No. 1120-The United States vs. H. P. Webb; unlawfully opening letter. No. 1121-The United States vs. Link Hankins: passing counterfeit money. No. 1132-The United States VS. M. L. Woods; misapplication National bank funds. No. 1133-The United States VB. W. T. Moore, Jr.; migapplication National bank funds. No. 1134-The United States vs. W. T. Moore, Jr.; embezzling National bank funds. No. 1135-The United States vs. W. O. Richardson: making false entries in bank books. No. 1136-The United States vs. W. O. Richardson; making false entries in bank books. No. 1137-The United States vs. W. O. Richardson; misapplication National bank funds No. 1138-The United States vs. W. O. Richardson; making false entries in bank books. No. 1139-The United States vs. W. O. Richardson; embezzling National bank funds.
