2735. Union Loan & Trust Company (Atlanta, GA)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
trust company
Start Date
February 26, 1897
Location
Atlanta, Georgia (33.749, -84.388)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
0664b23a

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles (Feb–Mar 1897) describe litigation leading to appointment of a receiver and permanent receivership for the Union Loan & Trust Company. No bank run or reopening is mentioned; the institution was placed in receivership and remained in receivership.

Events (2)

1. February 26, 1897 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Receiver appointed following litigation tied to Southern Mutual Building and Loan Association losses and alleged improper transfers; assets alleged being moved beyond jurisdiction.
Newspaper Excerpt
To-day a receiver was appointed for the Union Loan and Trust Company ... The bill alleges ... the Union Loan and Trust Company is moving its assets beyond the jurisdiction of the court.
Source
newspapers
2. March 13, 1897 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
W. I. Heyward was confirmed a permanent receiver of the Union Loan and Trust Company by Judge Lumpkin of Fulton superior court to-day. ... All the parties agreed to-day in asking for the immediate creation of a permanent receivership.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (4)

Article from The Morning News, February 26, 1897

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RIPLEY ASKS FOR RECEIVERS. THE STATE SAVINGS BANK CASE A COMPLICATED ONE. The Institutions Named in Receiver Ripley's Application Are the Union Loan and Trust Company, the Hale Investment Company, the Iowa Life Insurance Company and W. C. Hale-The Trust Company Owes the Bank $6,800 and the Investment Company Owes the Bank $2,000. Atlanta. Ga., Feb. 25.-T. J. Ripley, receiver for the State Savings bank, to-day filed a bill against the Union Loan and Trust Company, the Hale Investment Company, Iowa Life Insurance Company and W. C. Hale, in which he asks for a receiver for all and an injunction against the Iowa Life Insurance company. He alleges that the Union Trust company owns all the stock in the Hale Investment Company, that the Union Loan and Trust Company is indebted to the State Savings bank, $6,800, and that the Hale Investment company owes the bank $2,000. He alleges that the directors of these two corporations own considerable stock in the bank, and charges that the Hale Investment Company has deeded all of its real estate to the Union Loan and Trust Company, that the Union Loan and Trust Company has deeded it all to W. C. Hale, and that Hale has deeded it to the Iowa Life Insurance company. He alleges that all of these transfers were made without consideration, and for the purpose of hindering creditors in the collection of debts and therfore void, and he asks that these deeds be cancelled. He charges that the Union Loan and Trust Company has established a branch office in New York, and is fast moving the assets in Atlanta to New York. The branch office, he says, is indebted to the bank in the sum of $2,984. The injunction was granted and the case 1s 'set for a hearing on March 6. Some months before a receiver was asked for for the Southern Mutual Building and Loan Association, W. C. Hale, through this organization of his called the Union Loan and Trust Company, sought to make a loan for the ostensible purpose of obtaining funds with which to pay off some of the pressing withdrawals of the building and loan association. It transpired that the Union Loan and Trust Company deposited with the Iowa Life Insurance Company, about $110,000 worth of its choicest assets, on which there was advanced $15,000, and it was contemplated to make still other advances in large sums. Pending these negotiations a receiver was applied for and the trouble began. Now the lowa Life Insurance Company holds these securities as an innocent party, and cannot in law be made to turn them over, so attorneys say, until after the company has been reimbursed for the $15,000.


Article from The Morning News, February 27, 1897

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

MORE RECEIVERS AT ALTANTA. UNION LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY NOW INVOLVED. Application Also Made for a Receiver for the Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company-Both Companies Mixed Up :n Hale's Numerous Financial Ventures-Payment of the Losses of the Insurance Company Guaranteed by the Trust Company. Atlanta, Ga., Feb. 26.-The Southern Mutual Building and Loan Association muddle and the absence from the scene of action of W. C. Hale, former president of that concern. has caused a multiplicity of litigation affecting all the various companies with which he was connected. Yesterday there were applications for a receiver for the Hale Investment Company and several others in which he was a factor. To-day` a receiver was appointed for the Union Loan and Trust Company, which was another of Hale's combina. tions, and on account of the same muddle a receiver has been asked for the Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Company, though the other managers of this company declare that the receiver will be denied when a showing is made. The bill upon which the Union Loan and Trust Company was placed in a receiver's hands to-day was filed by the Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Company asking to be made a party plaintiff to the bill filed by T. J. Ripley, receiver, against the Union Loan and Trust Company. The bill alleges that the insurance company had an agreement with the Union Loan and Trust Company to pay to them 8 per cent. of their gross premiums, and in consideration of that agreement, the Union Loan and Trust Company guaranteed the payment of the losses of the insurance company. It is alleged that losses have occurred which the Union Loan and Trust Company has failed, and refuses to pay. It is alleged that the Union Loan and Trust Company has no assets, except office furniture, some real estate mortgages, in process of collection, and eight or ten shares of stock of the Indian Springs and Florida railroad. As a result of this litigation, Frank Crapp, receiver of the George Holiday Lumber Company, filed a bill for a receiver for both the Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Company and the Union Loan and Trust Company, alleging that the latter company is moving its assets beyond the jurisdiction of the court. The bill alleges that the insurance company assumed a risk on the plant of the lumber company, and that a loss has occurred by fire, which loss the insurance company fails and refuses to pay. He charges that the Union Loan and Trust Company guaranteed all losses that might occur to the insurance company, and that the Union Loan and Trust Company is moving its assets beyond the jurisdiction of the court. J. C. Dayton, former cashier of the State Savings Bank, is president of the insurance company, T. B. Felder is vice president, Peyton Douglas is secretary, and F. H. Carhart is treasurer; Nobody seems to know who the officers of the Union Loan and Trust Company are at the present time, as those who are supposed to be at its head deny it.


Article from The Morning News, March 1, 1897

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

WAS A STUPENDOUS STEAL. RECEIVER O'BYRNE ON THE LOOTING OF THE SOUTHERN MUTUAL. An Apparent Shortage of Not Less Than $250,000-Seenrities Amounting to $110,000 Disposed of By the President. the Receiver Says, And No Entry Made On the Books-A Deposit of $20,000 In a Defunct Bank All There Is to Show For a Cash Balance of $69,000-Stockholders Will Be Lucky to Get Half. Mr. M. A. O'Byrne returned yesterday morning from Atlanta, where he spent the greater part of last week attending the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Southern Mutual and Building and Loan Association and in investigating the affairs of the association. Mr. O'Byrne's election as president of the company to succeed the defaulting president, IT. C. Hale, and his subsequent appointment as one of the receivers of the association have already been announced by the Morning News. The prominent part taken by Mr. O'Byrne in securing a thorough investigation of the affairs of the association and his subsequent appointment as receiver is very gratifying to the Savannah stockholders, who are very largely interested in the wrecked institution. The Savannah stockholders are nearly all investors, their stock being nearly all matured, and very little money having been taken out on loans. The face value of the holdings here approximates $50,000. According to Mr. O'Byrne, the association is the most thoroughly looted institution in the state of Georgia. To use his language, it is the most stupendous steal that was ever perpetrated in the state. So far as the receivers have been able to ascertain, the shortage amounts to about $250,000. W. C. Hale, the defaulting president of the association, has disappeared, and all efforts to locate him SO far have been unsuccessful. Apparently the greatest steal of the whole business was that of $110,000 of securities of the association, which were disposed of to the Iowa Insurance Company through the Union Loan and Trust Company of Atlanta, which is now in the hands of a receiver. It has been stated that the Iowa Insurance Company paid $100,000 for these securities, but there is not a scratch of the pen to show that the Mutual Building and Loan Association ever received $1 of benefit from this transaction. The only record on the books of the company relating to this transaction, Mr. O'Byrne stated, is an entry in the minutes of a meeting of the board of directors, at which It is said only four members were present, authorizing the president to arrange for placing $100,000 of debenture bonds of the association to be secured by collaterals of the association aggregating $110,000. A well-known security company was to be trustee for the bonds, but it afterward withdrew from the transaction. The Union Loan and Trust Company conducted the deal. No entry, Mr. O'Byrne says, was ever made on the books of the company to show what amount of money was received for the bonds or securities or what disposition was made of It. The transaction appears to have been a somewhat complicated one, and all the details have not been gotten at as yet. The president of the Iowa Insurance Company was in Atlanta a few days before the application for the appointment of a receiver was filed, but whether his visit had any bearing on the receivership is not known. The company was wired for information as to the deal and a telegram was received in reply, stating that a letter to Receiver Anderson of Feb. 8 would give all information desired. This letter has never been received. Another big item of the steal. Mr. O'Byrne stated, was the trust fund of $69,000 in cash, which should have been in bank to the credit of the association. The only cash found in bank was $20,000, which had been deposited with the State Savings Bank, another one of Mr. Hale's concerns, which is now in the hands of a receiver. The indications at present are that the depositors of the bank will get their money, but the investigation of the bank's affairs has not gone far enough yet to make anything a certainty. Then there is another big item of loss, an apparent shortage of $200,000 of real estate loans, which have probably been hypothecated with various concerns. This sum may have been considerably reduced by repayment of loans and credits. For assets the association has $332,000 of securities in the hands of the state treasurer and about $60,000 of assets found in the safes of the company. The securities will hardly realize their face value and may fall considerably short of the amount Assets and claims amounting to about $150,000 are in dispute. The total liabilities of the company, including stock, are $1,130,000. Mr. O'Byrne thinks that the stockholders will be lucky to get back 50 per cent. of the money they have put in. There is no possibility of reorganizing the association and placing it on a working basis again, he said, and the only thing to do is to go ahead and wind up its affairs. The receivership is likely to be quite a lengthy one, Mr. O'Byrne said, on account of the tangled condition of the association's affairs, and on account of the number of legal points which will have to be decided. The relative standing of the several classes of stockholders, of those who have paid in their stock and whose claims against the company are now matured, those who have given I Otice of withdrawal, those who have not yet completed the payments on their stock and the debtor stockholders, who borrowed money from the association. The position of each class of stockholders makes an interesting point which will have to be determined by the court. Mr. O'Byrne will go up to Atlanta tonight for the purpose of qualifying, together with Judge Anderson before Indge


Article from The Morning News, March 14, 1897

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

UNION LOAN AND TRUST. (W. I. Heyward Made Permanent Receiver of the Institution. Atlanta, Ga., March 13.-W. I. Heyward was confirmed a permanent receiver of the Union Loan and Trust Company by Judge Lumpkin of Fulton superior court to-day. He was made temporary receiver several weeks ago. All the parties agreed to-day in asking for the immediate creation of a permanent receivership. The company is involved in the Southern Mutual Building and Loan Association litigation, having taken a bond in placing the $110,000 of Southern Mutual securities with the Iowa Life Insurance Company. The permanent receivership was asked by the receivers and attorneys of the Southern Mutual, in order to facilitate a settlement of this branch of the case.