2545. Citizens Bank (Rome, GA)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
April 11, 1881
Location
Rome, Georgia (34.257, -85.165)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
d6355125e6187085

Response Measures

None

Description

Newspaper accounts (Apr 25, 1881) state that Citizens' Bank (Rome, GA) suspended payment two weeks since and is heavily indebted to the State ($103,000). No article mentions a run or reopening; the Supreme Court decision giving the State priority implies insolvency and that other creditors will receive little. Date of suspension is inferred from two weeks since relative to the Apr 25, 1881 dispatch (approx. Apr 11, 1881).

Events (1)

1. April 11, 1881 Suspension
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Bank suspended payments due to insolvency/large indebtedness to the State (owed $103,000); Supreme Court decision on state priority indicates assets insufficient for creditors
Newspaper Excerpt
the Citizens' Bank is indebted to the State $103,000... which suspended payment two weeks since.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Chicago Daily Tribune, April 26, 1881

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BAD FOR THE CREDITORS. The State of Goorgia Declared by the Mupreme Court to Be a Preferred Creditor of the Bankrupt Romo Bank. Special Dispatch to The Chicago Tribune. ATLANTA, Gu., April 25.-The Supreme Court of Georgia to-day rendered a unanimous decision in favor of the State in the COMU of The State of Georgia VR. The Bank of Rome, which was n State depository, giving the State a prior claim to nii the assets of the bank over personal and all other creditors of the bank. This was made a test enso, the BRIND being involved in doolding priority of the State over the claims of creditors of the Citizens' Bank, niso a depository, which suspended payment two weeks since. Associate-Justice E. Crawford delivered the decision, which the Court claims is based upon the common law, and also upon the law governed by the Depository act. By this decision personal as well as all other creditors of the Bank or Rome, as well na citizons of Georgia, will have to take what is left after the State is satisfied. The Home Bank owes tho State $53,000, and the Citizens' Bank is indebtod to the Stato $103,000. The Impression seems to be that after the State is entistical there will be nothing left for the other creditors, ne both banks were regarded as wildout concerns, sclouted eithor through negligence on the part of the Governor, or criminal collusion between bim and the officers of the bank, by which both parties to the contract were to be benefited. The case may be curried to the Supremo Court of the United States. This, however, depends upon whether an appual can be taken.


Article from The Marietta Journal, August 4, 1881

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

PRIORITY. WE are not opposed to granting the charter to the Rome road, and would deem it selfish to deprive the people along the proposed new line of railroad facilities to help develop their country. We are in favor of the road being built. Yet at the same time we do not lose sight of the legal proposition that the State has prior claim in protecting her property from loss or depreciation, just as the State has prior claim over the private citizen in the suspended Rome Bank and Citizens' Bank in deposits. The Supreme Court has 80 decided. However, the Rome road will be built and built speedily, and its friends need not get unduly excited.