21962. Bennington County Savings Bank (Bennington, VT)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Run Only
Bank Type
savings bank
Start Date
October 23, 1891
Location
Bennington, Vermont (42.878, -73.197)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
220f2a75

Response Measures

Accommodated withdrawals

Description

Newspapers report a brief, small run in late Oct/early Nov 1891 caused by false stories that a trustee (Wm. E. Hawks) was financially embarrassed. The run was short-lived, payments were made to those who desired it, and the bank's stability was not disturbed; there is no mention of suspension or closure.

Events (2)

1. October 23, 1891 Run
Cause
Rumor Or Misinformation
Cause Details
False stories that a trustee (Wm. E. Hawks) was financially embarrassed and owed the bank, prompting depositors to withdraw.
Measures
Bank paid everyone who desired funds during the week; trustees rely on by-law requiring notice for larger withdrawals.
Newspaper Excerpt
there has been a small run this week... Indeed the run is dead after a very brief existence.
Source
newspapers
2. November 5, 1891 Run
Cause
Rumor Or Misinformation
Cause Details
Sensational/exaggerated report of failure of trustee Wm. E. Hawks led to withdrawals totaling about $15,000; bank remained stable.
Measures
Payments made to depositors who withdrew; public statements assuring solvency and citing by-law notice provisions.
Newspaper Excerpt
A sensational and exaggerated story that Wm. E. Hawks... caused a run on the Bennington county savings bank... Some $15,000 was drawn out but the stability of the bank was not disturbed.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Bennington Banner, October 23, 1891

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

The Savings Bank For the purpose of allaying fear and to give people confidence in the soundness of the Bennington County Savings Bank, against which there has been a small run this week, we have taken pains to get reliable information as to its condition. We assure our readers that it is not only well managed but that we believe there is not a safer bank in existence to-day than ours. Its securities are first class, its deposits have steadily increased for years and a "run" on it at this time is a very senseless proceeding. Indeed the run is dead after a very brief existence. As near as we can ascertain this flurry was all caused by false stories that one of the trustees was financially embarassed. This grew to include the falsehood that the trustee aforesaid, owed the bank, and hence the rumors and consequent uneasiness of the depositors, or a certain portion of them. None of the trustees have or can have the use of any funds, as we state in another place to-day. During this week everybody thus far has been paid who desired it, yet the following by-law of the bank is well understood. Sec. 17 says: "While the trustees are expected to keep on hand sufficient funds to meet, on demand, all the ordinary and reasonable calls of depositors, the latter cannot expect to have their money so loaned as to produce them interest and at the same time be in the bank earning nothing. Therefore, to guard against contingencies and to enable the trustees to meet all the obligations of the bank within a reasonable time, although any deposit or part of a deposit not exceeding $25 will be paid on demand, for larger sums the trustees are authorized to require notices as follows: Over $25 and not over $50, five days; over $50 and not over $100,ten days; over $100 and not over $200, twenty days; over $200 and not over $300 thirty days: over $300 and not over $500 fifty days; over $500 sixty days. Providing that no depositor by dividing his deposit otherwise than as above, shall be entitled to require payment any sooner than he would have been entitled had he given notice for the whole at once." We learn from the officials that there is positively no ground for fears. Our readers will recall that under Vermont laws it is practically impossible for a savings bank to fail; none to our knowledge has ever done so. It therefore remains with the depositors largely to say whether by their future course they shall injure an institution that is of so much blessing to this community or not.


Article from Herald and News, November 5, 1891

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

A sensational and exaggerated story that Wm. E. Hawks of Bennington had failed for a large amount last week, caused a run on the Bennington county savings bank of which Mr. Hawks is a trustee. Some $15,000 was drawn out but the stability of the bank was not disturbed. The local Bennington papers declare that Mr. Hawks has not failed and even if he had the bank would not be affected. The manufacturing buildings on the Ber lin side of the Winooski river at Montpelier, of late occupied by the Colton Manufacturing Company, nickel and silver platers and dealers in saddlery hardware, by the Colby wringer company and by Thos. Gisborne, wood worker, have been sold by Col. Fred E. Smith, to the Colton Manufacturing Co. for $20,000. The buildings originally cost $60,000 and extend along the river bank 552 feet. The water privilege that goes with the buildings is practically unlimited.