21806. Farmers Bank (Richmond, VA)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
January 18, 1876
Location
Richmond, Virginia (37.554, -77.460)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
f09e1639

Response Measures

None

Description

Newspaper notices repeatedly refer to 'John S. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia', indicating the bank had a receiver appointed (i.e., closed and in receivership). No article describes a depositor run. The court order is dated January 18, 1876; publication dates in late Jan–Feb 1876. Classified as suspension leading to permanent closure/receivership.

Events (1)

1. January 18, 1876 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
John S. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et als., IN EQUITY. ... RICHMOND, 18th January, 1876. A true copy-Teste: M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (5)

Article from The Daily Dispatch, January 22, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

CANALBOATS. CANAL-DOATS. UNION LINE OF Boat GL ENWOOD will leave THIS EVENING for Lynehburg and Buchanan. Freights received at 1503 Dock street. MORRISON & KENT, Agents for Union Line. ju 22.1t COURT ORDERS. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA: George G. Thompson John S. vs. Morson. receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et 368., IN EQUITY. Upon motiou of George G. Thompson, by counsel, it appearing to the court that Henry Dupont, Eleuthen J. Dupont. Samuel Dupont, and Eugene Dupont, trading under the name and style of E. J. Dupont, De Nemours & Co., are not residents of the state of V irginia, and it appearing that they are made carties to a bill of review this day thed by the said Thompson, it is ordered that they appear here at the rules to be held in the clerk's office of this court on the first MONDAY in March, 1876, to plead, answer, or demur. or do whatever else may seem fit to them to the sald Thompson's bill of review; and that this order be published ones's week for four successive weeks in one of the papers published in the city of Richmond. RO. W. HUGHES, Judge. RICHMOND, 18th January, 1876. A true copy-Teste: M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk. ja 22-S41


Article from The Daily Dispatch, January 31, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# COURT ORDERS. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; George G. Thompson vs. John S. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et als., IN EQUITY. Upon motion of George G. Thompson, by counsel, it appearing to the court that Henry Dupont, Eleu-then J. Dupont. Samuel Dupont, and Eugene Dupont, trading under the name and style of E. J. Dupont, De Nemours & Co., are not residents of the State of Virginia, and it appearing that they are made parties to a bill of review this day filed by the said Thompson, it is ordered that they appear here at the rules to be held in the clerk's office of this court on the first MONDAY in March, 1876, to plead, answer, or demur, or do whatever else may seem fit to them to the said Thompson's bill of review; and that this order be published once a week for four successive weeks in one of the papers published in the city of Richmond. RO. W. HUGHES, Judge. RICHMOND, 18th January, 1876. A true copy-Teste: Ja 24-M4t M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk.


Article from The Daily Dispatch, February 7, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

COURT ORDERS. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; George G. Thompson 08. John S. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et als., IN EQUITY. Upon motion of George G. Thompson, by counsel, it appearing to the court that Henry Dupont, Eleuthen J. Dapont. Sainuel Dupont, and Eugene Dupont, trading under the name and style of E. J. Dupont, De Nemours & Co., are not residents of the State of V (regials, and it appearing that they are made parties to a bill of review this day filed by the said Thompson, it is ordered that they appear here at the rules to be held in the clerk's office of this court on the first MONDAY in Mareb, 1876, to plead, answer, or demur, or do whatever else may seem fit to them to the said Thompson's bill of review; and that this order be published once a week for four successive weeks in one of the papers published In the city of Richmond. RO. W. HUGHES, Judge. RICHMOND, 18th January, 1876. A true copy Teste: M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk. ja 24-M4t


Article from The Daily Dispatch, February 14, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

COURT ORDERS. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE IN UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; George G. Thompson vs. John 8. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et als., IN EQUITY. Upon motion of George G. Thompson, by counsel, It appearing to the court that Henry Dupont, Eleuthen J. Depont. Samuel Dupont and Eugene Dupont, trading under the name and style of K. J. Dupont, De Nemours & Co., are not residents of the State of V irginia, and It appearing that they are made parties to a bill of review this day filed by the said Thompson, it is ordered that they appear here at the rules to be held in the clerk's office of this court on the first MONDAY in March, 1876, to plead, answer, or demur, or do whatever else may seem fit to them to the said Thompson's bill of review; and that this order be published once R week for four successive weeks in one of the papers published in the city of Richmond, RO. W. MUGHES, Judge. RICHMOND. 18th January, 1876. A true copy-Teste: M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk. a 24-M41


Article from The Daily Dispatch, February 21, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# COURT ORDERS. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; George G. Thompson vs. John S. Morson, receiver of the Farmers Bank of Virginia et als., IN EQUITY. Upon motion of George A. Thompson, by counsel, it appearing to the court that Henry Dupont, Eleuthern J. Dupont, Samuel Dupont, and Eugene Dupont, trading under the name and style of E. I. Dupont, De Nemours & Co., are not residents of the State of Virginia, and it appearing that they are made parties to a bill of review this day filed by the said Thompson, it is ordered that they appear here at the rules to be held in the clerk's office of this court on the first MONDAY in March, 1876, to plead, answer, or demur, or do whatever else may seem fit to them to the said Thompson's bill of review; and that this order be published once a week for four successive weeks in one of the papers published in the city of Richmond. RO. W. HUGHES, Judge. RICHMOND: 19th January, 1876. A true copy-Teste: M. F. PLEASANTS, Clerk. ja 25-M41