United States Trust Company

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: trust company
Start Date: March 7, 1911
Location: Washington, District of Columbia (38.895, -77.036)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 861ba967

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles are court docket entries referencing 'United States Trust Company vs. David, receiver' and a decree affirmed (Mar 7, 1911). No newspaper text describes a depositor run; the bank appears in receivership proceedings, indicating closure under court/receiver action.

Events (1)

1. March 7, 1911 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: No. 2111. United States Trust Company agt. David, receiver; decree affirmed, with costs; opinion by Mr. Justice Robb.
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (4)

1. April 19, 1910 Evening Star Washington, DC

Article from Evening Star, April 19, 1910

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THE COURT RECORD. Court of Appeals. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Robb and Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. R. W. McMahon was admitted to practice. No. 2118. District of Columbia agt. Kraff, and No. 2119, District of Columbia agt. Gregory; on motion plaintiff in error allowed to file supplemental brief herein, if so advised. No. 2105. Tyssowski agt. Smith: passed until May. No. 2057. Fidelity Storage Corporation agt. Trussed Concrete Steel Company: on motion of Mr. F. L. Siddons of counsel for appellee bond to act as supersedeas on appeal to United States Supreme Court fixed at $500. No. 2089. American Savings Bank agt. Eisminger: motion for modification of decree submitted by Mr. E. A. Jones, attorney for appellee, in support of motion. No. 2111. United States Trust Company agt. David. receiver: argument commenced by Mr. G. L. Baker for appellant. continued by Mr. L. H. David and by Mr. Alexander Wolf for appellee and concluded by Mr. B. S. Minor for appellant. Proceedings after The Star's report closed vesterday: No. 2010. Marrone agt. Washington Jockey Club: writ of error to United States Supreme Court ordered to issue on motion of Mr. L. A. Bailey, attorney for appellant, and bond fixed at $300. No. 2065. Thompson agt. Thompson: motion to modify decree submitted by Mr. W. M. Lewin, attorney for appellee, in support of motion. No. 2057. Fidelity Storage Corporation agt. Trussed Concrete Steel Company: appeal to United States Supreme Court prayed by Mr. F. L. Siddons, of counsel for appellee, allowed, and mandate stayed till further order. No. 2065. Thompson agt. Thompson: motion to modify decree as to costs granted, so far as costs in this court are concerned. No. 2082. Jackson agt. Washington, Baltimore and Annapolis Electric Rallway Company: motion to restore words stricken from opinion overruled.

2. April 20, 1910 The Washington Herald Washington, DC

Article from The Washington Herald, April 20, 1910

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DISTRICT COURTS. Court of Appeals. Present-All. Admission-R. W. McMahon. No. 2118. District of Columbia vs. Kraft, and No. 2119. District of Columbia vs. Gregory; on motion, plaintiff in error allowed to file supplemental brief herein if so advised. No. 2105. Tyssowski et al. vs. T. H. Smith Company; passed until May. No. 2057. Fidelity Storage Corporation et al. V8. Trussed Concrete Steel Company; on motion of Mr. F. L. Siddons, of counsel for appellee, bond to act as supersedeas on appeal to Supreme Court of United States fixed at $500. No. 2089. American Savings Bank et al. vs. Eisminger: motion for modification of decree submitted by Mr. E. A. Jones, attorney for appellee, In support of motion. No. 2111. United States Trust Company vs. David, receiver; argument commenced by Mr. G. L. Baker for appellant. continued by Mr. L. H. David for appellee. continued by Mr. Aiex. Wolf for appellee, concluded by Mr. B. O. Minor for appellant. No. 2114. District of Columbia vs. Sanford; argument commenced by Mr. F. H. Stephens for appellant, concluded by Mr. W. W. Edwards for appelles. Assignments for to-day: No. 2117. Hart VS. Capital Traction Company. Attorneys, Worthington, Wolf & Frailey-Perry & Son and Dunlop. No. 2120. Baltimore and Ohio Railread Company vs. Onorato. Attorneys, Hamilton-Downing & Berry. No. 2123. Parsons vs. District of Columbia. Attorneys. Thomas & Ridout-Thomas. No. 2125. National Benefit Association vs. Elzie. Attorneys. Stewart-Coombe. No. 2126. Metzger 18, Metzger. Attorneys, Wallace & Metzger-Moulton & Millan. No. 2127. Butts VS. Butts. Attorney. Ewing. No. 2128. Mackenzie et al. TB. Crouse. Attorneys, Mather & Blair. No. 2129. King TS. Macfarland et al. Attorneys, Padgett & Forrest. No. 2130. Nalle vs. Oyster et al. Attorneys, Gittings & Chamberlin-Wilson & Perry. No. 2135. Cunningham et al, vs. Taylor. Attorneys, Millan & Smith.

3. March 7, 1911 Evening Star Washington, DC

Article from Evening Star, March 7, 1911

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Court of Appeals. Present: The Chief Justic. Mr. Justice Robb and Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. Charles T. Tittmann. Paul E. Bradley William F. Powell and French C. Simp son were admitted to practice. No. 2267. Bride agt. Baker et al.: con tinued. No. 2271. Bluthenthal agt. Carson passed. No. 2202. Robinson agt. Hillman: man date stayed until further order on motion of Mr. L. A. Bailey. No. 2256. Hilton agt. Rackey: argu ment commenced by Mr. J. E. Padget for appellant, continued by Mr. Cranda Mackey for appellee and concluded by Mr. John Ridout for appellant. No. 2270. National Mechanics' Bank agt. Lincoln: continued. No. 2260. Lee agt. Welch: motion to continue and extend time for printing submitted by Mr. Henry E. Davis of counsel for appellants: motion granted on condition that record be printed in time for hearing when cause is next called for argument. No. 2265-Magruder agt. Drury: place at foot of patent calendar. No. 2269-American Realty Company agt. Thompkins: argument commence by Mr. H. F. Woodard for appellant and concluded by Mr. J. J. Darlington fo appellee. No. 2272-Hearn agt. Thomas: contin ued. No. 2246-Davis agt. United States: ar gument commenced by Mr. Henry E Davis for appellant. continued by Mr James M. Proctor and Mr. Clarence R Wilson for appellee. Dewey agt. Todd; argued and submit ted: plaintiff's attorneys. W. F. Matting ly and W. C. Clephane: defendant's at torneys, H. P. Blair and W. C. Johnson Proceedings after The Star's report closed yesterday: No. 2178. Bride agt. Reeves et al.: de cree as to Agnes Reeves affirmed: as to other defendants reversed. with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2111. United States Trust Company agt. David, receiver: decree affirmed, wit! costs; opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2102. Warner agt. Baker: judgment reversed, with costs, and cause remanded with directions to arrest the judgment opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 9222. Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington Railroad Company agt. Schu bert: judgment affirmed, with costs: opin ion by Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2229. Fisher agt. Ballinger: decree affirmed, with costs; opinion by Mr. Jus tice Robb. No. 2177. District of Columbia agt Washington Gas Light Company: judg ment reversed. with costs, and cause re manded. with directions to grant a new trial: opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsde (Mr. Justice Robb dissenting in part). No. 2263. District of Columbia agt. Willett: judgment of the Police Court af firmed: opinion by Chief Justice Shepard No. 2161. Iowa Apartment House Company agt. Herschel: judgment affirmed with costs: opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2227. Yates agt. Yates: decree af firmed, with costs: opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 2241. Robinson agt. Hillman: judg ment reversed. with costs. and cause re manded for another trial; opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2181. Smith agt. Gardiner: decree affirmed. with costs: opinion by Mr. Jus tice Robb. No. 2228. Berchett agt. Seale: decre affirmed. with costs; opinion by Mr. Jus tice Van Orsdel. No. 2216. Reeves agt. Slater: decree af firmed, with costs: opinion by Chief Jus tice Shepard. No. 2225. Coberth agt. Great Atlantic and Pacific T.a Company; judgment af firmed, with costs: opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2261. Groff agt. Groff: judgmen affirmed. with costs; opinion by Mr. Jus tice Van Orsdel. Patent appeal No. 656. Ladoff agt Dempster: decision of commissioner 0 patents as to counts 4, 5 and 6 reversed opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. Patent appeal No. 657. Ladoff ast Dempster: decision of commissioner o patents as to counts 1. 2 and 3 reversed opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. Patent appeal No. 658. Ladoff agt Dempster: decision of commissioner o patents reversed; opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. Patent appeal No. 659. Dempster agt Ladoff: decision of commissioner of pat ents affirmed: opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2245. Columbia Laundry Company agt. Ellis: judgment affirmed, with costs opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. Patent appeal No. 686. Griffith agt Braine: decision of commissioner of pat ents affirmed; opinion by Mr. Justice Var Orsdel. Patent appeal No. 674. F. A. Sargs Sohn & Co. agt. Hall & Ruckell: decision of commissioner of patents reversed opinion by Chief Justice Shepard. Patent appeal No. 695. Miller agt. Spel ler: decision of commissioner of patent f Shon

4. March 7, 1911 The Washington Herald Washington, DC

Article from The Washington Herald, March 7, 1911

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DISTRICT COURTS. Court of Appeals. Present-All Admissions-John J., McDonnell, George M. Wilmaith, Daniel C. Mulloney, Thomas R. Fitzgerald, Edward Thomas, Thomas B. Shoemaker. No. 2226. Turnbuckle VS. Wright; death of appellant and appointment of Edward N. Hopewell as administrator suggested, and said administrator made party appellant, on* motion of Mr. W. G. Gardiner. attorney for appellant. No. 2273. United States ex rel. Rew: 11 VS. Ballmyer; No. 2258. Loving VS. Moore et al.; No. 2257. United States vs. Anti-Kamnia Chemical Company; patent appeal No. 653. Rufing VS. Lowry; continued. No. 2216. Davis VS, United States; No. 2264. Miller VS. United States; and No. 2247. Shoemaker Company VS, Munsey; placed at foot of calendar. No. 2268. Rudolph et al. VS. Mosenval; argument commenced by Mr. F. H. Stephens for appellants, continued by Mr. R. H. McNeill for appellee, concluded by Mr. F. H. Stephens for appellants. No. 2253. Adriaans VS. Dill et al.; argument commenced by Mr. T. L. Jeffords for appallant. continued by Mr. D. W. McDonoghue, concluded by Mr. E. L. Gies. No. 2178. Bride VS. Reeves et al.: decree as to Agnes Reeves affirmed as to other debts, reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2111. United States Trust Company vs. David, receiver; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2102. Warner VS. Baker; reversed and remanded with instructions to arrest judgment. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 2228. Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington Railroad Company TS, Schubert; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2229. Fisher VS. Ballinger, &c.; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2177. District of Columbia TS. Washington Gaslight Company; reversed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel, Mr. Justice Robb dissenting in part. No. 2263. District of Columbia VS. Willett: affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2161. Iowa Apartment House Company vs. Herschel: affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2227. Yates VS Yates; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel, No. 2241. Robinson et al. VS. Hillman et al.; reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2181. Smith et al. VS Gardiner, administrator; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2228. Buchett, administrator. VS. Peale; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 2225. Cabuth VS. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Robb. No. 2261. Groff, &c., TS. Groff et al.; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 2216. Davis VS. United States; half hour additional allowed each side. No. 2176. Campbell VS. Northwest Eckington Improvement Company et al.: appeal to Supreme Court prayed by Mr. John Ridout, attorney for appellant, and bond for costs in sum of $300 approved. No. 2194. George VS. Ford; motion for rehearing denied. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 2202. Robinson et al. VS. Hellman et al.; same. Opinion per curiam. No. 686. Griffith vs. Braine; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Van Orsdel. No. 674. F. A. Says, Schn & Co. VS. Hall & Ruckall; reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 695. Miller vs. Speller: affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 676. Star Brewery Company Vº Val Blatz Brewing Company; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 691. Muralo Company VS. National Lead Company; reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 675. Curtis VS, Lindmark: No. 700. Lind strom VS. Ames: No. 701. In re application of Edgar H. Cottrell: Nos. 705 and 706. Townsend TS. Copeland, and Copeland VS. Townsend: No. 707. In re application of Charles H. Tallmadge: No. 708. McIntyre VS. Perry; No. 711. Dickman VS. Burne: continued. No. 656. Ladoff V3. Dempster; counts four. five. and six reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No Got. Ladoff vs. Dempster: counts one two, and three reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 658. Ladoff vs. Dempster: reversed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. No. 659. Dempster vs. Ladoff; affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Shepard. Assignments for March 7: No. 2260. Lee et al. vs. Welch et al. Attorneys, Keigwin & Davis Davidge. No. 2265. Magruder vs. Drury et al. Attorneys, Wilson & Wilson Darlington. No. 2267. Bride vs. Baker. Attorneys, Hallam, Hallam-O'Callaghan & Bride. No. 2269. American Realty Company VS. Thompkins. Attorneys, Birney & Woodard-Darlington & Wolf. No. 2270. National Metropolitan Bank vs. Lincoin. Attorney. Ralston. No. 2271. Bluthenthal & Beckart VS. Arlington Bewing Company. Attorneys, Wheatley-Bailey & unn. Special calendar: No. 2. Davis vs. United States. Attorneys, Davis -Wilson. No. 6. Miller FS. United States. Attorneys, Davis & Laskey-Wilscn. Regular call: No. 2256. Hilton FS. Rackey. Attorneys, PadgettMackey.