18505. Tyler National Bank (Tyler, TX)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Run Only
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
4747
Charter Number
4747
Start Date
November 30, 1896
Location
Tyler, Texas (32.351, -95.301)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
ed321ecf8f526e6b

Response Measures

Public signal of financial health

Description

Article (1896-11-30) reports failure of the First National of Tyler precipitated a small run on the Tyler National Bank; officers published a statement of condition which satisfied depositors and withdrawals ceased. A later (1903) court article discusses litigation related to the Tyler bank cases but does not indicate a suspension/closure or reopening of Tyler National itself. Classify as a run only.

Events (3)

1. June 1, 1892 Chartered
Source
historical_nic
2. November 30, 1896 Run
Cause
Local Banks
Cause Details
Failure of the First National of Tyler (failed and did not open) precipitated withdrawals from Tyler National.
Measures
Officers published a statement of the bank's condition to reassure depositors.
Newspaper Excerpt
The failure of this bank precipitated a small run on the Tyler National bank here, the officers of which got out and published a statement of its condition, which seemed to satisfy its depositors and the withdrawals ceased.
Source
newspapers
3. December 31, 1898 Voluntary Liquidation
Source
historical_nic

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Houston Daily Post, December 1, 1896

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

First National of Tyler. Tyler, Texas, November 30.-The First National bank of this city failed this morning and did not open Its doors for business. The president of the bank, H. H. Rowland, placed a notice on its front door that all depositors would be paid in full. The bank directory gave out a lengthy statement, in which they stated that heavy withdrawais had for some time been made by depositors: that about the time of the failure of the City National bank here on October 18. 1896, $30,000 were withdrawn and that from November 21 to 28 between $70,000 and $80,000 had been taken out by depositors and that since the bank's public statement of October 6, 1896, the bank's liabilities in the shape of bills payable and rediscounts have been reduced over $61,000. The officials of the bank, anticipating heavy withdrawals this morning. made every effort to procure the cash to meet the demands of depositers, but the time in which TO secure such funds was too short and they falled to do so. The directory states that there will be an effort to reorganize the bank and to resume business with reasonable hopes of success. The failure of this bank caused an almost total collapse here, as it did nearly all the business of this community. The failure of this bank precipitated a small run on the Tyler National bank here, the officers of which got out and published a statement of its condition, which seemed to satisfy its depositors and the withdrawals ceased.


Article from The Houston Daily Post, January 25, 1903

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THE TYLER BANK CASE GOVERNMENT DENIES AN AGREEMENT TO DISMISS. Motion by Defendants Was Overruled, After Lengthy Arguments Had Been Made in Support of It. Tyler. Texas, January 24. The Tyler bank cases are still occupying the attention of the Federal court at this place, The motion made by the defendants to dismiss was heard today. The application of the defendants for postponement until such time 8.8 the affdavits of ex-Governor Hugg and General L. T. Michener of Washlugton City and others and all correspendence which passed between the at. torney general and District Attorney Me. Lemore. the attorney general and the comptroller of the currency with reference to the settlement and agreement to dismiss alleged to have been made by the at torney with the defendants. which defendants desired to use in reply to the government's answer to the defendants' motion to dismiss, was overruled. The arguments on the general motion then commenced and lasted till late. The testimony In support of the motion shows that the defendants paid an amount of money to the receiver of the bank for the benefit of the creditors and in addition $5000 to cover the government's cost at a former trial, which amount It is alleged was accepted by the attorney general and by him forwarded here for distribution; that three months after the payment of the money the at torney general reconsidered the agreement to settle and instructed the district attorney to proceed with the prosecutions. The government's answer to the defendants' motion was A complete dental by the 7 district attorney In person. and by the attorney general, signed 8.8 ex-officio counsel In the case, that an agreement was made by the attorney general's department to T dismiss. At the close of argument the 1 court overruled the defendants' motion.