Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
BANK GUARANRY LAW JUSTIFIED There was a $3,000,000 bank failure in Oklahoma within the last two days and all the organs of plutocracy got ready to rejoice over the failure of the bank guarantee law. The Statesman cawed a feeble pipe and the Oregonian gave a number of quotations from eastern journals, but there was no excitement in Oklahoma. The failure caused a ripple for a single day and then the after was practically an incident that was closed. Do you read anything about this in your daily paper? Not much. The big news combines are not in the business to exploit information that is of benefit to the people. Just think of it. A three million dollar bank failure and not a depositor loses a dollar or is in anywise inconvenienced. The bank's doors are never closed. only a change from the bank officials to the officials of the state. Truly it was a great demonstration of the justice an dbenefit of the new law. The following editorial comment upon the case we take from the Oklahoman, of Oklahoma City While the public interest in Columbia bank suspension waned after the first day when the depositors found that they could get their money, and died altogether on Thursday when depositors ceased to apply, discussion has continued unabated among the bankers and business men. The general feeling is one of surprise that conditions in financial circles did not show at least some signs of uneasiness and disturbance. As a rule the suspension of so large a bank would mean a run on country banks which deposited with it, and consequent embarrassment on their part. There was none of this, everyone appearing to wait to see first what would be done with the Columbia depositors. Of course a certain amount of excitement was allayed by the presence of Governor Haskell who, as the head of the banking board, was in charge of affairs. Some of the antagonists of the state banking law point out that the governor could not be in charge if a number of banks were involved in different cities, but in the future cases the quick settlement of the Columbia's affairs will stand as a precedent to prevent undue alarm being felt, and the state bankers do not consider that the future holds any fear of panic for them under the existing system. The cry has been raised in certain quarters that the other bankers must pay for the business delinquencies of a fellow banker. This does not appear, however, as the state bankers do not consider that the regular assessments to maintain the state nuaranty fund are more than a legitimate tax upon their business. In the case of the Columbia the banking board members are inclined to think that the fund will not be impaired as the bank will be able to make good its shortage. It is admited by all bankers that sometimes poor loans will be made. and that poor crop and business conditions will sometimes seriously depreciate the value of what were good loans when made. and it is admitted that a bank's loans are rather more important than the deposits, inasmuch as the loans must return the deposits with interest, but in the ordinary course of business the provisions of the law for undivided profits, reserve and surplus and capital stock liability are protection. It is when all these fail, however, and the bank is undeniably "short" that protection is needed and it is this that the guaranty fund has shown it will provide in Oklahoma. Indiscretion on the part of a single banker might, it is true. compel the other bankers of the state to pay a small price for quiet and the security of their own banks. But the price while paid by the bankers is borne by the people. for it is the public that supports the banks, and the bank guaranty fund is the only way the public has of securing itself against misfortune and its own hysteria. The consensus of opiion of all the bankers but the national bankers, is in favor of the system as tried out by the Columbia's suspension, and many of the national bankers are ready for conversion to the state plan which the state bankers now predict will shortly become general. Opposition to the state banking plan is being curbed in a measure by a very general impression among Oklahoma business men, an impression that is the spectre that stalks ever at the elbow of the national banker. It is that any continued panic among Oklahoma banks would result in the establishment of a postal banking system. The experience through which the Columbia has passed will prove a benefit to many Oklahoma bankers, however, for it has not been without its lesson. Generally when misfortune or disacter assail us they leave us chastened. It is so with banks. Sometimes bankers forget training they have received. Sometimes they have not had the proper training. In such cases experience is the teacher, and this instructor spares not the rod. Bankers of long experience and proven capacity declare that a bank should not be conducted for any one set of men or class of trade: that a bank should have no politics; that it should not know east, west north or south: that it should favor no particular religious organization or denomination: A bank should so unite the business interests of a community that all may contribute to its success and prosperity. It should never extend such a large credit to any one person or firm that the failure of such a party or parties would imperil or embarrass the institution. Jim Brady's mania for public functions and dress parades has led him to issue a call to assemble all of the county commiss-