Article Text
BANK RECEIVER OPENS FIRE Halls B. Watkins Into Court Two Sults and Injunction Last Monday John H. Dykes, rethe defunct First National Bank in this city, filed two suits against Watkins in the federal court at Tulsa on promissory note for $2,050.00 and $220.00 attorney's fees, alleging fraudulent conveyance of property and asking the court for judgment at law and praying for restraining order to prevent the property being further conveyed by coming into the hands of innocent third parties. The plaintiff bank in its petitions alleges that prior to June 23, 1926, Watkins was the owner of 160 acres of land in Cleveland county, Oklahoma, and on June 23. 1926, did convey same to his brother, Watkins, without fair and valuable consideration and that said convey ance was made in bad faith for the purpose of hindering. delaying and defrauding the receiver from collecting said unsecured note. The plainLiff bank also alleges that by such transfer of property the defendant, Watkins, did make himself insolvent, and plaintiff prays that the deed of conveyance be set aside by the federal court and be declared fraudulent and void and that temporary injunction be issued by said court restraining defendants from further conveying said property. At the same time suit at law was instituted wherein the plaintiff bank asks for judgment on the note with Interest. costs and attorney fees. While no mention of it is made in either of the plaintiff's suits, the records of Osage county show that on June bill of sale from Watkins to his wife. Laura E. Watkins, was filed, purporting to have been executed on May 17, 1926, transferring his personal business property to his wife. The records also show that the business building occupied by B. Watkins was also deeded to his wife, Laura E Watkins, about the same time. A National Bank Receiver. being officer of the United States, may either the state courts Dykes, the receiver, that he uses the federal courts almost exclusively. If action is filed against the receiver in the state court the receiver may remove the case to the federal court. While attorney has yet been appointed for the bank, the receiver under his emergency authority employed Thos. Casey to bring these actions as an example to what other debtors may expect in case of similar conduct.