16355. New York Building Loan Banking Company (New York, NY)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
September 1, 1903*
Location
New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
2f18e73f

Response Measures

None

Description

The company is repeatedly described as 'defunct' and in the hands of a receiver since September 1903; articles discuss receivership hearings, a receiver's dividend (Sept 1906), property sales and liquidation. No run or depositor crowding is reported. This is a closed/liquidated institution in receivership.

Events (11)

1. September 1, 1903* Other
Newspaper Excerpt
has been in the hands of Charles M. Preston as receiver since September, 1903
Source
newspapers
2. September 1, 1903* Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
in the hands of Charles M. Preston as receiver since September, 1903
Source
newspapers
3. September 1, 1903* Suspension
Cause Details
Company already defunct and in receivership since 1903; suspension/closure preceded these articles
Newspaper Excerpt
the defunct New York Building Loan Banking Company
Source
newspapers
4. April 21, 1906 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
deed bearing date the 21st day of April, 1906, conveyed by Charles M. Preston, as Receiver
Source
newspapers
5. July 18, 1906 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
meeting of the New York Building Loan Banking Company's creditors ... representative of the receiver ... Receiver George W. Breston's demand that a dividend of 15 per cent be declared
Source
newspapers
6. August 31, 1906 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
receiver had on hand $600,000 in cash, and assets valued at half that amount ... apply to Justice Dowling for permission to pay a 15 per cent dividend
Source
newspapers
7. September 1, 1906 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Justice Dowling ... granted ... application of Charles M. Preston, receiver ... for permission to declare a 15 per cent dividend
Source
newspapers
8. September 8, 1906 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Preferred Shares of New York Building Loan Banking Company Go Cheap ... company has been in the hands of Charles M. Preston, as receiver, for several years
Source
newspapers
9. November 22, 1907 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
RECEIVERSHIP HEARING POSTPONED. The hearing on the receivership ... has been in the hands of Charles M. Preston as receiver since September, 1903
Source
newspapers
10. February 7, 1908 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
Deputy Attorney General ... adjournment ... Frederick S. Dunn, accountant for the receiver, reported a balance on hand of $262,350.93
Source
newspapers
11. January 5, 1916 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
properties conveyed to Charles F. Myers by Charles M. Preston, as Receiver of the New York Building Loan Banking Company by deed bearing date the 21st day of April, 1906
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (10)

Article from New-York Tribune, July 18, 1906

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

CLASS W SHAREHOLDERS FIGHT. Anxious to Maintain Preferred Right in New York Building Loan Banking Company. There was a meeting of the New York Building Loan Banking Company's creditors yesterday in the office of Referee Walter S. Logan. Alfred L. Becker, representing Attorney General Mayer, said he believed that the company had sufficient assets to justify a dividend, not of 15, but probably of 20 per cent. This was in answer to Receiver George W. Breston's demand that a dividend of 15 per cent be declared. Attorneys representing disallowed claims, especially those of the Class W shareholders, opposed Mr. Breston's request on the ground that were such a dividend declared the assets would not permit the payment of claims now disallowed, but which might subsequently be established. The meeting adjourned until next Tuesday. F. B. Woodruff, Oscar B. Bergstrom and Charles C. Cormany represented the disallowed claimants. Charles W. Dayton represented the receiver. Referee Logan disallowed the opposition's contentions, the question, however, being renewable by the Supreme Court. The holders of Class W stock maintain that either the issue of their class of stock was invalid, or else it was valid and their claims as "creditors" should take precedence over other claims. The other side maintains that as "guarantors" Class W stockholders should not have recognition until all other claims shall have been satisfied.


Article from New-York Tribune, August 31, 1906

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

COURT ASKED FOR DIVIDEND GRANT. New York Building Loan Banking Company Settlement Expected on May 1. The hopes of about two hundred investors in the New York Building Loan Banking Company. which went to the wall some years ago, were dashed to the ground by the announcement by Charles W. Dayton, counsel for the receiver, in the County Court, before Justice Dowling, that it would be impossible to make a settlement before May 1 next. The presence of the people was accounted for by notices of the decision of Charles M. Preston, the receiver, to apply to Justice Dowling for permission to pay a 15 per cent dividend. In asking the court to approve the request, Mr. Preston said that nearly a year ago the receiver had applied for permission to do the same thing. but that opposition among the larger stockholders developed, and a new referee was appointed. Continuing, he said that the receiver now had on hand $600,000 in cash, and assets valued at half that amount. Mr. Dayton believed the receiver would be able to distribute the money by May 1 next. Alfred L. Becker, representing the Attorney General, suggested that instead of the 15 per cent dividend, one of 20 per cent be allowed. He argued for the speedy closing of the receivership. Justice Dowling took the papers and reserved decision, but he told counsel that they could look for an early decision.


Article from New-York Tribune, September 1, 1906

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RECEIVER'S DIVIDEND OF 15 PER CENT Court Approves It in Case of New York Building Loan Banking Company. Justice Dowling of the Supreme Court, granted yesterday the application of Charles M. Preston, receiver of the defunct New York Building Loan Banking Company. for permission to declare a 15 per cent dividend. When the case was argued the representative of the Attorney General did not opposé the paying of the dividend, but said that in his opinion the


Article from New-York Tribune, September 8, 1906

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# TIRED STOCKHOLDERS SELL OUT. Preferred Shares of New York Building Loan Banking Company Go Cheap. Many holders of stock of the defunct New York Building Loan Banking Company were selling their shares yesterday to the Corporation Liquidating Company and W. N. Coler & Co., receiving 10, 12 or 15 cents on the dollar of face value, according to the class of shares they had to dispose of. The buyers would offer nothing for shares of the class corresponding to common stock. The company has been in the hands of Charles M. Preston, as receiver, for several years. Mr. Preston only a few days ago asked permission of the court to pay a dividend of 15 per cent on shares of the preferred classes, but the motion was opposed by the holders of Class W shares. Some of the shareholders have begun to fear that they never will receive any dividends. Mr. Hole, of W. N. Coler & Co., said yesterday that his firm was simply buying the company shares on the order of a customer. Mr. Preston has been answering all inquiries by saying that he hopes to pay 50 cents on the dollar to most shareholders as soon as the affairs of the wrecked company can be settled. The receiver has been involved in much litigation on account of claims against the company and is unable to say when the court will permit him to make a final report.


Article from The Sun, July 15, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

PATENTS. ADVICE FREE - Patents promptly procured: Inventors' Guide FREE. EDGAR TATE & CO; Patent Attorneys. 245 Broadway. Bowers & S, attorneys: R. H. Clark. referee: due on judgment. $23,885.90: subject to taxes, &c., $876.90; subject to two mortgages aggregating $42,000. Jumel place, west side, 241.3 feet north of 167th street, 125x100, vacant; R. C. Dorsett VS. Jacob Weinstein et al.: R. C. Dorsett, attorney: W. C. Arnold, referee: due on judgment, $24,952.75; subjeet to taxes, &c., $893.90. Prospect avenue, Nos. 730 and 732. east side, 100 feet south of 156th street, 50x88.11x62.10x125. five. story brick flat: People's Bank and Trust Company vs. Samuel Barkin etal.; J. R. Burnet, attorney: J. A. Cantor. referee; due on judgment. $6,903.92; subject to taxes, &c. $1,000; subject to two prior mortgages aggregating $9,000. TUESDAY, JULY 16. By Bryan L. Kennelly. Seventy-eighth street. No. 318 to 326. south side. 212.6 feet east of Second avenue. 87.6x102,2. two six story brick flats and stores: Golde & Cohen VS. Samuel Sindeband etal.: Manhelm & M., attorneys; T. B. Brennan, referee; due on judgment, $10,486.11; subject to taxes. &c., $338. WEDNESDAY JULY 17. By Joseph P. Day. Greenwich street, No. 429 to 433. northeast corner Leight street, 76x125.5x irregular, nine story brick loft and store building. Fiftieth street, No. 210, south side. 77.10 feet west of Broadway, 25x100.5, two and three story brick building and store. Fiftleth street, No. 212. south side, 102.10 feet west of Broadway, 25x100.5, two and three story brick building and store. Bankers' Trust Company vs. Frederick Deitz et al.: White & C., attorneys: E. W. Crittenden, referee: partition. Broadway southwest corner of 135th street. 149.11x100, vacant. A. I. Spiro vs. B. C. Clark: Spiro & W., attorneys: Isham Henderson. referee: due on judgment. $33,371. 66: subject to taxes. &c., $500; subject to two mortgages aggregating $85,000. THURSDAY, JULY 18. By Joseph P. Day. Water street, Nos. 336 and 338, north side. 67.5 feet east of Roosevelt street, 37,9x05,9x37,6x67.3, two four story brick tenements and stores. Trafalgar place, No. 5 west side, 150 feet south of 176th street, 25x65. vacant. Washington avenue, No. 2159, west side, about 300 feet north of 181st street, X two story frame dwelling: People of the State of New York vs. New York Building Loan Banking Company: C. W. Day ton, Jr., attorney; C. M. Preston, receiver: receiver's sale. Seventy ninth street, No. 338, south side, 199 feet west of First avenue, 17x202.2. three story stone front dwelling: Clara Dellac, et al., trustee. &c. VS. M. W. Stein, et al.: H. A, Vieu, attorney; H. S. Dottenhelm, referee: due on judgment, $8, 486.35: subject to taxes, &c., $158.49. Fifty seventh street, No. 211, north side, 150 feet east of Third avenue, 27x100.5, five story stone front tenement. Eleventh street. No. 830, south side. 320 feet east of Avenue D, 189x94.9. one story brick stores and vacant. Tenth street, south side, 407.8 feet east of Avenue D. 150x92.3. one story frame building and vacant, Ninth avenue, Nos. 883 and 885, northwest corner of Fifty seventh street, 100,5x25, five story stone front tenement and store. Tenth street, Nos. 474 to 478, south side, 332.8 feet east of Avenue D. 75x92.3. one and two story frame building: Mary Hagemeyer vs. George Hagemeyer, et al.; Krakower & P., attorneys: J. F. Coffin, referee: due on judgment, $46,772.91; subject to taxes, &c., all right, title. &c., which George and CasperHagemeyer had on August 21, 1894. By William Kennelly & Son Rivington street, Nos. 58 and 60, north side, 46.2 feet east of Eldridge street 42x80; three story brick synagogue; Universal Building and Construction Company vs. Moritz Welsman, et al. Max Schleimer, attorney: W. F. Clare, referee; due on judgment, $22,290.76; subject to takes, &c., $975. FRIDAY. JULY 19. By Joseph P. Day. 117th street, No. 14, south side, 158.4 feet west of Fifth avenue, 33.4x100.11, five story brick flat: J. A. Smith vs. Abraham Orentty, et al.; J. R. Burnet, attorney: W. J. Bolger, referee: due on judgment, $28,891.43; subject to taxes, &c., $73. By Bryan L. Kennelly. Tremont avenue, southeast corner of Aqueduct avenue, runs east to Harrison avenue (proposed) X south to proposed street X west to Aqueduct avenue I north. lots 1 to 31. Macomb's road. northeast corner 176th street, runs northwest to proposed street R east to Harri son avenue X south to 176th street X west, lots 32 to 57. Harrison avenue, northeast corner 176th street, runs north to Tremont avenue x northeast to lane X south to 176th street X west to beginning, lots 58 to 77: A. D. Huntington, executrix, etal. vs. S. H. Knee land et al.: Parsons, C. & M., attorneys: J. F. Coffin, referee: due on judgment, $808,339.64; subject to taxes, &c., $44,575.


Article from New-York Tribune, November 22, 1907

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RECEIVERSHIP HEARING POSTPONED. The hearing on the receivership of the New York Building Loan Banking Company, which has been in the hands of Charles M. Preston as receiver since September, 1903, scheduled to come up yesterday afternoon before Thomas F. Conway, the referee, was adjourned until next Monday at 2 p. m., the referee having a case to argue before the Appellate Division. The claims of Justice Charles W. Dayton, of the Supreme Court, and of his son, Charles W. Dayton, jr., for legal services rendered to the receiver are expected to come up at the hearing.


Article from New-York Tribune, February 7, 1908

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

ADJOURN HEARING ON DAYTON BILL. Counsel to Receiver of New York Building Loan Banking Company Wants $30,000. In the receivership proceedings of the New York Building Loan Banking Company, before Referee Thomas F. Conway, at No. 32 Liberty street, yesterday afternoon, Deputy Attorney General Mott obtained an adjournment until February 14 to give him time to frame some questions which he desired to put to Charles W. Dayton, jr., who is trying to collect $30,000 for services rendered as counsel to the receiver for eight and a half months. He did not have a contract. Frederick S. Dunn, accountant for the receiver, reported a balance on hand of $262,350 93. After a dividend is paid out of this sum there will be more than $134,000, out of which another dividend will be declared, and the receivers and attorneys' claims paid. These, it was said, cannot be fixed until the Dayton case is settled.


Article from New-York Tribune, January 10, 1916

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

second Ward of the City of New York, County of New York and State of New York, and bounded and described as follows, viz.: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street distant 80 feet westerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Fortyseventh Street with the westerly side of Ninth Avenue, running thence southerly parallel with Ninth Avenue and part of the way through a party wall 60 feet, thence westerly and parailel with Fortyseventh Street 20 feet, thence northerly parallel with Ninth Avenue 60 feet to the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street and thence easterly along the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street 20 feet to the point or place of beginning, be the said several distances and dimensions more or less. and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F. Myers by Charles M. Preston, as Receiver of the New York Building Loan Banking Company by deed bearing date the 21st day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York, on the 3rd day of May, 1906, in Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 114, page 360, in Section 4. and indexed against Block 1086 on the Land Map of the City of New York. Said premises are subject to the right, If any, of the owner or occupant of the lot adjoining said premises on the west to use the wall erected on or along the westerly line or side of said premises as a party wall; the easterly wall of the building erected on said premises is a. party wall. PARCEL IX. ALL that certain lot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings thereon erected, situate, lying and being on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street between Ninth and Tenth Avenues in the Borough of Manhattan and City of New York, bounded and described 8.8 follows: BEGINNING at a point on the poutherly line of Forty-seventh Street distant 60 feet westerly from the southwesterly corner of Forty-seventh Street and the Ninth Avenue, thence running westerly along Forty-seventh Street 20 feet, thence southerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue and partly through & party wall 50 feet, thence easterly parallel with Forty-seventh Street 20 feet and thence northerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue 50 feet to the point or place of beginning, be the said several dimensions more or less, said premises being known 88 No 402 West Forty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Manhattan, City and State of New York, and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F Myers by Peter C. Eckhardt, Jr., and Susan Anna V., his wife, and Frederick Eckhardt and Margaret Mary, his wife, by deed bearing date the 80th day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York on the second day of May, 1906, In Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 116, page 126, in Section 4, and indexed against Block 1056 on the Land Map of the City of New York Sald premises are subject to the right, If any, of the owners or occupants of the lot adjoining said premises on the east to support upon the easterly wall of the building erected on said premises the beams of a shed erected on said adjoining lot; and to the right of support of the beams of a four story building erected on the lot adjoining said premises on the east; the westerly wall of the building erected on said premises is a party wall. Parcel numbered I is subject to a mortgage on which there 18 now due the sum of $6,000, with accrued interest, to be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale thereof. Parcels numbered II to IX inclusive are subject to monthly tenancies, pursuant to oral leases entered into since the filing of the Its pendens In this action Parcels numbered I to IX inclusive are sold subject to the state of facts shown on blue print surveys thereof, made by Earl P Lovell, and filed herein in the office of the Clerk of New York County on December 15, 1915 Copies thereof may be examined at the office of Messre Rollins & Rollins, plaintiff's attorneys All unpaid taxes and water rates, with accrued interest, due at the time of the sale will be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale. Dated, New York City, January 5, 1916. ALGERNON S. NORTON, Referee ROLLINS & ROLLINS, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and Post Office Address, 32 Nassau Street, Borough of Manhattan, New York City The following are diagrams of the premises to be sold:


Article from New-York Tribune, January 17, 1916

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

creachment under the MY therefrom: the easterly and westerly walls of the building erected thereon are party walls. PARCEL VIII. ALL that certain lot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being In the Borough of Manhattan and Twenty. second Ward of the City of New York, County of New York and State of New York, and bounded and described as follows, viz. BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street distant 80 feet westerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Forty* seventh Street with the westerly side of Ninth Avenue, running thence southerly parallel with Ninth Avenue and part of the way through a perty wall 50 feet, thence westerly and parallel with Fortyseventh Street 20 feet, theneo northerly parallel with Ninth Avenue 50 feet to the southerly' line of Forty-seventh Street and thence easterly along the southerly line of Street 20 feet to the point or place of beginning, be the said several distances and dimensions more or less, and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F. Myers by Charles M. Preston, AH Receiver of the New York Building Loan Banking Company by deed bearing date the 21st day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York, on the 3rd day of May, 1906, in Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 114, page 360, In Section 4, and indexed against Block 1066 on the Land Map of the City of New York. Said premises are subject to the right, If any of the owner or occupant of the lot adjoining said premises on the west to use the wall erected on or along the westerly line or side of said premises as a party wall; the easterly wall of the building erected on said premises is a party wall. PARCEL IX. ALL that certain lot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings thereon erected, situate, lying and being on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street between Ninth and Tenth Avenues in the Borough of Manhattan and City of New York, bounded and desertbed as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street distant 60 feet westerly from the southwesterly corner of Forty-seventh Street and the Ninth Avenue, thence running westerly along Forty-seventh Street 20 feet, thence southerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue and partly through a party wall 50 feet, thence easterly parallel with Forty-seventh Street 20 feet and thence northerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue 50 feet to the point or place of beginning be the said several dimensions more or less, said premises being known as No. 402 West Forty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Manhattan, City and State of New York, and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F Myers by Peter C. Eckhardt Jr., and Susan Anna V., his wife, and Frederick Eckhardt and Margaret Mary, his wife, by deed bearing date the 30th day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York on the second day of May, 1906, in Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 116 page 126, In Section 4. and indexed against Block 1056 on the Land Map of the City of New York Said premises are subject to the right, if any of the owners or occupants of the lot adjoining said premises on the east to support upon the easterly wall of the building a erected on said premises the beams of shed erected on said adjoining lot; and to the right of support of the beams of a four story building erected on the lot adjoining said premises on the east; the westerly wall of the building erected on said premises is a party wall. Parcel numbered I is subject to a mortgage on which there 18 now due the sum of $6,000, with accrued interest, to be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale thereof. Parcels numbered II to IX Inclusive' are subject to monthly tenancles, pursuant to oral leases entered into since the filing of the lis pendens in this action Parcels numbered I to IX inclusive are sold subject to the state of facts shown on blue print surveys thereof, made by Earl P. Lovell, and filed herein in the office of the Clerk of New York County on December 15, 1915. Copies thereof may be examined at the office of Messrs. Rollins & Rollins, plaintiff's attorneys. All unpaid taxes and water rates, with accrued interest, due at the time of the sale will be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale Dated, New York City, January 5, 1916. ALGERNON S. NORTON, Referee. ROLLINS & ROLLINS. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and Post Office Address, 32 Nassau Street, Borough of Manhattan, New York City The following are diagrams of the premises to be sold:


Article from New-York Tribune, January 28, 1916

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

of the building erected thereon are party walls. PARCEL VIII. ALL that certain lot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Borough of Manhattan and Twenty. second Ward of the City of New York, County of New York and State of New York, and bounded and described as follows, viz. BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street distant 80 feet westerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Fortyseventh Street with the westerly side of Ninth Avenue, running thence southerly parallel with Ninth Avenue and part of the way through a party wall 50 feet, thence westerly and parallel with Fortyseventh Street 20 feet, thence northerly parallel with Ninth Avenue 50 feet to the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street and thence easterly along the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street 20 feet to the point or place of beginning, be the said several distances and dimensions more or less, and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F. Myers by Charles M. Preston. as Receiver of the New York Building Loan Banking Company by deed bearing date the 21st day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York, on the 3rd day of May, 1906, in Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 114, page 360, in Section 4, and indexed against Block 1056 on the Land Map of the City of New York. Said premises are subject to the right, it any, of the owner or occupant of the lot adjoining said premises on the west to use the wall erected on or along the westerly line or side of said premises as a party wall; the easterly wall of the building erected on said premises is a party wall. PARCEL IX. ALL that certain lot, piece or parcel of land with the buildings thereon erected, situate, lying and being on the southerly side of Forty-seventh Street between Ninth and Tenth Avenues in the Borough of Manhattan and City of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of Forty-seventh Street distant 60 feet westerly from the southwesterly corner of Forty-seventh Street and the Ninth Avenue, thence running westerly along Forty-seventh Street 20 feet, thence southerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue and partly through a party wall 50 feet, thence easterly parallel with Forty-seventh Street 20 feet and thence northerly parallel with the Ninth Avenue 50 feet to the point or place of beginning, be the said several dimensions more or less, said premises being known as No. 602 West Forty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Manhattan, City and State of New York, and are the same premises which were conveyed to said Charles F. Myers by Peter C. Eckhardt, Jr., and Susan Anna V., his wife, and Frederick Eckhardt and Margaret Mary, his wife, by deed bearing date the 30th day of April, 1906, and recorded in the office of the Register of the County of New York on the second day of May, 1906, in Block Series (Conveyances) in Liber 116, page 126, in Section 4. and indexed against Block 1056 on the Land Map of the City of New York Said premises are subject to the right, if any, of the owners or occupants of the lot adjoining said premises on the east to support upon the easterly wall of the building erected on said premises the beams of a shed erected on said adjoining lot; and to the right of support of the beams of a four story building erected on the lot adjoining said premises on the east; the westerly wall of the building erected on said premises is a party wall Parcel numbered I is subject to a mortgage on which there is now due the sum of $6,000 with accrued interest, to be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale thereof. Parcels numbered II to IX inclusive are subject to monthly tenancies, pursuant to oral leases entered into since the filing of the lis pendens in this action. Parcels numbered I to IX inclusive are sold subject to the state of facts shown on blue print surveys thereof. made by Earl P. Lovell, and filed herein in the office of the Clerk of New York County on December 15, 1915. Copies thereof may be examined at the office of Messrs. Rollins & Rollins, plaintiff's attorneys. All unpaid taxes and water rates, with accrued interest, due at the time of the safe will be paid by the Referee out of the proceeds of the sale. Dated, New York City, January 5, 1916. ALGERNON S. NORTON, Referee. ROLLINS & ROLLINS, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and Post Office Address, 32 Nassau Street, Borough of Manhattan, New York City The following are diagrams of the prem/ ises to be sold: